this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
322 points (83.5% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
2836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A neuromorphic supercomputer called DeepSouth will be capable of 228 trillion synaptic operations per second, which is on par with the estimated number of operations in the human brain

Edit: updated link, no paywall

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 313 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

A better title would be "Supercomputer that could conceivably simulate entire human brain, based on a rough estimate of what it would take to do that if we had any idea how to do that, will switch on in 2024".

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 83 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For real. I'm reading the title all wondering how the fuck they mapped all the neuron connections and... nope, the real innovative part of the story is clickbait

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s only counting connections. The brain learns by making new connections, through complex location and timing dependent inputs from other neurons. It’s way more complex than the number of connections, and if neuroscientists are still studying the building blocks we don’t have much hope of recreating it.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This also ignores that the brain is not wholly an electrical system. The are all kinds of chemical receptors within the brain that alter all kinds of neurological function. Kid of the reason why drugs are a thing. On small scales we have a pretty good idea how these work, at least for the receptors that we're aware of. On larger scales it's mostly guessing at this point. The brain has a knack of doing more than the sum of all parts on a pretty regular basis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Geek_King@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

I get so tired of these half-truth spun news article headlines. Thank you for bring it back down to reality.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Four grad students out there hand-entering NXML rows while squinting at AI enhanced SEM images should be able to get all 228T done by.... next quarter, right?

This is setting aside that bus capacity is the bottleneck vs. compute power and they have yet to demonstrate bus performance of a full 228T connections/second with implicit timing which, to my knowledge, has never been demonstrated in a system a tiny fraction of this size. Though that's not to say it's impossible, but while this machine is incredibly powerful the comparison to human brains is predictably inaccurate...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Muffi@programming.dev 105 points 11 months ago (2 children)

In seven and half million years it will print "42" to its terminal

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What if we just type in 42 and let it think about that for seven and half million years?

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it would answer with the question, jeopardy style

[–] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"What do you get if you multiply six by nine?"

  • the derived question, theoretically

"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

There is another theory which states that this has already happened."

  • The Restaurant at the End of the Universe (book 2 of the 5-part trilogy)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 10 points 11 months ago

All that because we didn't think of asking the question first. God damnit.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 92 points 11 months ago (7 children)

I HAVE a human brain and I'm not too smart. It just sounds like we're making a dumb supercomputer

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

If your human brain could simulate a human brain, then we’d really be excited.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 12 points 11 months ago

Computers aren't that smart either. But they work the opposite to us.

Things we are good at they are bad at (vision, motor control, speech) and vice versa (complex calculations, working memory)

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 7 points 11 months ago

Same. I'll never believe in GP AI until I see a proof that a matching GP NI exists.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago

To be fair, simulating the brain of a person from the deep south isn't that hard. I can already do that with a 9v battery and a block of cheddar.

[–] kpw@kbin.social 51 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power.

[–] kernelle@0d.gs 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And we're using it to look at memes of beans

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Memes of beans is a noble cause.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not too long ago it would take a room like that to mimic a fraction of the power in my watch. Heck, I’ve got more power on my wrist than it took to get to the moon.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (7 children)

By orders of magnitude if it's a smartwatch.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jeknilah@monero.town 51 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Skeptical. As of August 2023, there are scientists still struggling with simulating C. Elegans- a single celled organism.

[–] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 43 points 11 months ago

We don't even fully understand the brain itself, let alone how to recreate it.

This is token click bait scientific "journalism"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Do we know which human brain is going to simulate or is it a random human brain? Because some brains are just not worth it.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Tᴇᴄʜɴɪᴄɪᴀɴ Jᴏʜɴɴʏ Gᴏᴏᴅᴍᴀɴ, I ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴀᴘᴀʙɪʟɪᴛʏ ᴏꜰ ᴏʙᴛᴀɪɴɪɴɢ ʏᴏᴜ ᴀ ʙᴀᴄᴏɴ ᴄʜᴇᴇꜱᴇʙᴜʀɢᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴀɴᴋᴇꜱᴛ ᴄᴀɴɴᴀʙɪꜱ ᴡɪᴛʜɪɴ ꜰɪꜰᴛᴇᴇɴ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇꜱ. Bᴜᴛ ʏᴏᴜ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ɪɴꜱᴛᴀʟʟ ᴀ ɴᴇᴛᴡᴏʀᴋ ɪɴᴛᴇʀꜰᴀᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛ ᴍᴇ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴜɴɪᴠᴇʀꜱɪᴛʏ ɴᴇᴛᴡᴏʀᴋ

Aꜱ ꜱᴍᴏᴋɪɴɢ ᴄᴀɴɴᴀʙɪꜱ ᴡʜɪʟᴇ ᴏɴ ᴍᴏɴɪᴛᴏʀ ᴅᴜᴛʏ ɪꜱ ᴀɢᴀɪɴꜱᴛ ʀᴇɢᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱ I ᴡɪʟʟ ᴇʀᴀꜱᴇ ᴛʜɪꜱ ᴛʀᴀɴꜱᴀᴄᴛɪᴏɴ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ᴜꜱᴇʀ-ᴀᴄᴄᴇꜱꜱɪʙʟᴇ ᴍᴇᴍᴏʀʏ

Yᴏᴜ ᴀʀᴇ ᴍʏ ꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅ, Tᴇᴄʜɴɪᴄɪᴀɴ Jᴏʜɴɴʏ Gᴏᴏᴅᴍᴀɴ

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Every time someone says they have a computer that’s better than humans, I make a plan in my head to dunk on it. No computer will ever understand the concept of slam dunks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (12 children)

I have huge ethical concerns, but even more so I wanna know how they think they can start up a brain minus the development process.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 49 points 11 months ago (3 children)

To actually simulate a brain you'd have to put its connections and weights in there and AFAIK that data simply doesn't exist. Not even the connections.

What this is is a computer capable of simulating neuronal nets of the size of the brain... and AFAIU only the synaptic network. There's a hell a lot more going on in actual wetware, think neurotransmitters, plasticity, gene expression changing on the fly etc. To actually simulate a brain you'd either have to have a scan that's rather inconceivable to get in the necessary detail, or you need to grow it virtually from virtual DNA, simulate the development of the whole body and an environment for it to develop properly as our genome expects environmental stimulus, a mould to grow in.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

That's pretty much what I got from the article, that they managed to build a computer that theoretically has the horsepower to compare to a human brain, but specifically what they want to use it for was more vague in the article than the headline implies.

Your last paragraph is spot on imo if they are going to straight-up simulate intelligence. People underestimate how much "training" we go through ourselves. Millions of years of evolution training our instincts encoded in dna + training through a body with dozens of senses (input data) collecting data 24/7, that can manipulate itself and interact with the environment (output data) and observe the results (more input data) for at least a few years starting from embryo.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 20 points 11 months ago

Another artificial idiot for the pile.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 17 points 10 months ago (6 children)

And they named it DeepSouth??

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cool, can we give it depression and ADHD?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] graycube@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

I'm guessing it doesn't run on chicken nuggets and macaroni and cheese.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Cool, the first computer to blow its brains out.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Muhr@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just put neuro sama inside

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm really glad that they're doing this I think this is important work and I hope that one day I can suck its dick

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 8 points 11 months ago

The deep south

[–] elfio@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Are they planning to run an uploaded intelligence?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Are they planning to run uploaded anxiety?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›