Let's start with him and see how it goes.
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
79 points (97.6% liked)
Political Weirdos
1216 readers
650 users here now
A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.
- Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
- Follow Iemmy.world TOS
- Don’t be a jerk
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I heard he was planning to volunteer, just to make it popular again.
Careful what you ask for; you just may get it.
~🤞~
We're really ought to come up with a variant of the Darwin Award, tailored specifically for billionaires - like how the Herman Cain Award was created for COVIDiots.
Good, we'll start with Joe Lonsdale and see how it goes from there.
Obviously we're not going to apply any of this "masculinity" to rich people
Small dick compensating energy
Please let the monkey's paw curl on this one because it would be so fucken funny. All these assholes call for this, its about time they get what they asked for.
There aren’t many policy positions I would consider so abhorrent that they require violent opposition. Not many. But, a few.
We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others.
Except it doesn't deter anyone. In fact, in the past executions were a form of entertainment. And if there's a common thing amongst criminals is that everyone of them think they'll get away with it.
Public executions have never served as a deterrence, there's zero historical evidence of this. Crime existed in the days of public executions, hence the reason why we've got lots of them to point at.
And every time someone has said "we will quickly try people", what they are trying to radio in is, "suppress people's rights to a trail and appeal." And a billionaire calling for public executions and reformation of the justice system to skip particular steps due to the citizens, isn't something new. This kind of thinking is as old as time itself. That the aristocracy finds little value in protecting the rights of the common man is just the usual hum-drum of people who devalue human life.
it’s time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable
This whole quote is just remarkable. Who will protect the feminine political leaders from the wave of masculine leadership? Would not this supposition make them vulnerable? It's just white rich guys doing the usual white rich guy thing. So innovative a thinker the guy is.