89
Xcel fined $14K for storing radioactive water without permit at Monticello plant
(bringmethenews.com)
$14,000? Lol wtf kind of fine is that?
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
89 points (97.8% liked)
News
30790 readers
2566 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The kind billion dollar businesses pay because them's the rules. :/
That is the cost of business for these assholes. Until personal accountability is enforced for corporations, or the fine is large enough to punish any potential savings through intended wrongdoing
The C-Suite will have to pay for their own lunch for a day. That'll teach 'em!
That's less than what most businesses pay in a month for utilities. Wild.
I'm be curious to know how that storage method matches against the standard for storage.
I'm not in favor of removing a fine, get permitted dumbasses and all that, but if they at least followed the standard for storage then a small fine would be acceptable to me.
Permits also enable stuff like a regular independent inspection regime which might be a good idea for especially dangerous stuff.
It's not good enough (in my opinion) that they might be doing it right for now - they have do do what is necessary so that it can continue to be done right until the stuff is safe.
If they go out of business or sell the land or assets, the next people need to know what is where and how to handle it and have all the records and reports and so on. So a proper public record, rather than private would better.
Don't get me wrong, a spill is worse than a paperwok infringement, but
this fine seems trivial in relation to (what I think should be) the level of responsibility for handling and toxic materials - even just getting all the paperwork right.
Imagine if they did go out of business, and someone had to re-inspect the whole site to determine the risks with no reports to start from - could that be done for $14k?
Without having knowledge of the cost of inspection I can't answer that question.
I'm also not arguing against permits or the fact that they fucked up by not getting permitted, I'm just curious if that storage method is on par with the standard.
If so, then in your scenario the inspection would be at or near it's minimal cost because the inspector would check see everything they expect and life would be groovy. This is opposed to nonstandard methods where the inspector will have to figure out what impact their method did or did not have on the local environment which costs much more time (and money)