this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
326 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27363 readers
4706 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every day it is more and more apparent that the Boomer generation has overstayed its welcome. Climate change, plagues, endless wars . . .. The world will be better off when they're finally all dead.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And a distraction from polls and potential incoming election rigging from rich… so same ole same ole

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The pedophile ring thing is new...well maybe...eh you're probably right

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Convict and pedophile* Dennis Hastert was Speaker of the House from 1999-2007

*Not a convicted pedophile because the DOJ only ever went after him for trying to hide payouts to his victims after the fact and actually tried to keep the reason he was making those payments under wraps until some journalists got the story

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm curious to know what would happen if the systematic rigging was very obvious.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Systemic*

And, it has been for decades.

To those who still read comprehensively. 🥲

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 19 points 3 weeks ago

It also serves as a distraction from Trump likely being one of the redacted 10 co-conspirators in the Epstein Files. So much winning!

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Whew! Was worried this would have gone by without having been slammed.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They will be (and are already being) replaced by younger evangelicals, fascists (but I repeat myself), and con artists. They won't go away.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

True, but the Boomers are the generation that actively inhibited changes that would have curbed climate change (and still are utilizing government power today to inhibit curbing efforts) because it would hurt share prices. Climate change is an existential problem whose effect will neither be repeatable for hundreds and hundreds of years and will be felt for just as long. The Boomers are the ones who ushered all this in. It wasn't and isn't X, Millennials, Zoomers, or Alpha; but they'll get to enjoy the effects.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know how what is in the title is a "slam"; it's what Pedonald said, outright.

The crimes and the motivations for the crimes are right there, out in the open.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not even regime change. The regime is still there, just the president got removed. Trump doesn't understand what regime change actually entails.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not the one in Venezuela, but Cuba. Without the oil from Venezuela Cuba has an insane problem.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

No, it’s about oil assets seized by Maduro! No, it’s about drugs! No, it’s about freedom!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's about deflection. December 19, 2025 is long past us now and most Epstein files are still being withheld and have not been released. Trump will burn the whole world down in order to keep this away from the public. BOOM! Venezuela!

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm betting there's video footage of him fucking a kid. Like, a porn-o, or something. Maybe Epstein secretly recorded him?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where are the trump/epstein files?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Oh she "slammed" it? That's great, maybe she can also blast it? Maybe "AOC rips operation to capture Maduro"? Decries? Lashes out at?

For fuck's sake for how many more years are you going to accept an opposition party that does absolutely nothing constructive while the right wing lunatics do whatever they want? Who the hell care's about some angry statement?

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago

With what powers? Legal and political maneuvering has been neutered.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"care's"? Really? Ugh.

I mean, FFS. The possessive form of "care" isn't a thing, so that's not even an autocorrect issue unless you've fucked it up at least once before.

Stay in school, kiddo. Get mad, stay mad, but get smart, too. 🫶🏼

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

English is my third language. I don't speak it because I respect it, I speak it because that's the one you read. I don't care where you shove your 's, this language is not in a position to request consistency.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

What a rational, well-adjusted retort.

May I request consistency?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have to point out, yet again, that a single individual of the house has virtually no individual power. What are you expecting her to do, break into the white house and single handedly arrest him?

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You should be aggressively protesting and she should be joining and organising said protests.

This is basic, obvious, beyond classical civics. The fact you pretend writing an angry letter is the best a politician can do either makes you complicit with the actions your country are taking, lazy, dumb, or the three at once.

"SHe's OnLy oNe PeRSoN" why do you bother electing and paying a salary to these people if whenever they're needed your default answer is "welp, nothing they can do"