this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
43 points (89.1% liked)

Games

22813 readers
57 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] verdi@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

Not even thinking of anything till the steam frame is out!

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

May save you a click:

No price yet, similar products have launched at $699

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

171-inch doesn't make any sense in this context.

We know it's 1080p, but what definition ? In other words, how far does that supposedly "171 inch" TV sit from your face ?

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

"like sitting in front of a whopping 171-inch display from four meters away"

[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Say that second sentence again, but slowly.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right? 1080p is literally resolution of 1920x1080.

Maybe they meant to say Dot Pitch?

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago

I meant definition.

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

I meant definition. Aka pixels per centimeter squared.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm kind of interested depending on pricing. Using it as a monitor would be neat too

[–] FruitLips@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I'm on my third pair, the Viture pro, 120hz / 1080p oled and I think they're pretty neat. Particularly Viture's individual dials for your eyes if you're a little near sighted. Had the Xreal before, maybe they got better but after going and and getting the lense inserts adjusted to my prescription by an optometrist, (which took a couple weeks and cost an additional ~$100) they still were just a little off which sucks for text- the fuzzies manifest differently with minute differences in distance from your eyes, so they all kinda clamp on your head and it hurts before long without a hat or something to better distribute the pressure. Ymmv, I'd still recommend if you're at all a techie. No discernable pixels whatsoever and they've been easy enough to buy n sell used ^_^

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These things always have light isolation issues. It’s why the google glass failed and why Apple and Microsoft tried to do AR based on a VR headset instead of glasses like this.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

No, that's not why Google Glass failed. It would have failed even with a perfect display.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

mmmm. these kinda look like you could wear them with a pair of glasses behind them.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They come with a thing you can put prescription lenses in, so maybe!

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

that kinda sounds like no then. usually being able to put in lenses suggests its not meant to be worn with glasses.