this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
222 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

78485 readers
2981 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 114 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AI is so amazing we just need to hire entire departments to make sure it isn't completely full of shit!

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Waow, look at all the money we saved with layoffs. Buy our stock!

Waow, look at all the growth we’re experiencing, we have to hire more developers. Buy our stock!

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Sadly, this is exactly what's happening.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or, you know, you could just build a good search engine and let users scroll 15 seconds in the first result to find what they're looking for.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

SEO-marketing slop articles: exists on the first three pages

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, the "good" part means surfacing relevant, high-quality information, not click maximisers

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We fire humans to prop up AI. But AI is so not there yet that we need humans to double check.

🙃

[–] fdnomad@programming.dev 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but the new humans are cheaper

[–] funkycarrot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

This. This is one of the main reasons AI is being hyped by the tech bros. It's a powerful pretext to lay off hundreds of thousands of engineers across the sector and re-hire them as "contractors".

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

🎶 it's the ciiiircle of liiife.... 🎶

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago

After brainwashing, here comes slopwashing by Google's clank engineers.

[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not anti-AI at all, but their LLM definitely isn't ready for the top of a google search as if it is real information. Of course, posting promoted search results at the top of the searches as if it was a real result already devalued them. They at least need the LLM result to be an opt-in option with caveats. I would probably opt-in but I would like off to be the default.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Ive had many times where the LLM "spoils" the answer, my field of work requires me to search for exact pieces of text written by humans, it will pull those pieces of text and put them front and center, surrounded by text it wrote that never gets read.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I always wanted to be a Turk.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It's trained on their SERPs that have been steadily getting more useless for 20 years. Of course its answers suck.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everybody must jump onto the AI train no matter how often it derails!

So who profits?

The unholy alliance of tech giants and government.

Who loses?

Everybody else. This is US tax money being thrown into a money burning machine.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

wasted money is bad enough, but the environmental cost is the one we should be rioting about

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They didn’t have people doing that?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago

I've seen 100 shitty job postings for rating AI results. It's rather complicated and pays pennies.