this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
542 points (98.6% liked)

Comic Strips

21200 readers
3902 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Pitchforks and torches were best "weapons" a peasant had lying around that they could grab.

What I am trying to say is get your guns.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

A bow and arrows would make a great guerilla warfare weapon, though. That's one of the things I loved about the OG Punisher movie.

Plus they're significantly easier to make than a gun and you don't need to register with the government.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A crossbow is the best of both

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 day ago

The reload speed is an issue, though. But it does make a good blunt weapon.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

this is why we need open sourced pitchforks and torches

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 days ago (2 children)

According to Time in 2011, the protesters' adoption of the mask had led to it becoming the top-selling mask on Amazon.com, selling hundreds of thousands a year. Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns Warner Bros. and DC Comics, owns the rights to the image and is paid a fee with the sale of each copyrighted mask.

22698

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Also, notably, Guy Fawkes was in no way anti-establishment or anti-monarchy, and was certainly not an anarchist. Fawkes (and his group) wanted to replace a Protestant monarch with a Catholic one.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Very true, but as the movie says it's a symbol. "Symbols are given power by people" and Guy Fawkes as a symbol is no longer tied to his historical actions. It symbolizes the character V, revolution, and the power of people to make change.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In much the same way a swastika means Nazi. Theres always that one guy that will tell you its an ancient symbol that means peace, but show anyone on the planet and they'll say its a nazi thing.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

but show anyone in the western hemisphere of the planet and they'll say its a nazi thing.

FTFY

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The guy with the ancient symbol evidently can't mirror or rotate objects in their head…

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

There may be less confusion over the whole thing if there weren't horribly misdrawn ones all over basically every city

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This symbol says "I want to blow people up for God!"

Symbols should be chosen with more care, and not adopted from movies or comic books.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah in V for Vandetta he's used as a symbol of British rebellion against the government, because the comic is extremely British. That said, the book is extremely anarchist and V is explicitly an anarchist, and the mask in popular culture at least in America is far more closely tied to that than to the actual gunpowder plot

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ah, interesting, is V an anarchist?

I've seen the movie more recently than read the book, so I don't remember the exact presentation, but... don't you think the phrase:

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.

Imply that V expects governments to exist?

V has both personal and ideological problems with the current establishment, but I'm not sure that he's completely against any establishment.

[–] n4ch1sm0@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Movie and the graphic novel are drastically different in many ways. V is definitely an anarchist in the comic; not quite the same vibe in the movie.

He's representative of a revolutionary, an anti-establishment force, in the movie with no discernable political philosophy other than antifascist in a very English way.

Alan Moore, the original author, was quite critical of the film itself. I like the film a lot, but I totally understand that it's a farcry from Alan's vision in the graphic novel.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

V speaks of anarchy as having two roles: destroyer and creator, as he teaches Evey to create and he destroys. Additionally he describes anarchy as the order to be contrasted to the chaos immediately after his destruction of norsefire's control.

As for that quote, I'm struggling to find evidence it was in the comic (I never actually watched the movie). The wikiquote for the comic doesn't have that line, but the one for the movie does, and the comic one instead has a lot of V explaining anarchy to anyone whether or not they're interested in listening.

The comic is very explicitly about British anarchism against British fascism, whereas the movie is a lot more about George W Bush, the patriot act, and the left wing opposition to these things in the America of the early and mid 00s

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The movie was well produced and I think it delivers the intended message within its self-contained universe, but... considering that the entire story is framed in the context of the Gunpowder Plot, from beginning to end, I think that message is muddled when you understand the actual history behind it.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But the movie is about the fact that a man can become an idea, and once an idea, can no longer be a man. V cannot have love, because he has made himself into an idea and that idea is not compatible with the desires he feels in his heart. Just the same, the idea of Guy Fawkes does not require the consent or approval of the man.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

That idea being "I want a Catholic monarch on the throne".

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We outnumber the billionaires 2million to 1

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah but how many people would line up to defend ~~their god~~ the billionaires to the death?

Quite a few, if, say, Musk supporters are any example.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

We can always chew out their tracheas.

We can bludgeon them with our fists.

We can use their fat to make firebombs to burn the rest.

You've just got to get creative.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 13 points 3 days ago

Don't worry, stress will force us to grind our teeth to fangs

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago

Lol. Like we paying for shit at that point.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Funny enough us being able to afford a guillotine is in their best interest because alternatives include badly sharpened sticks, closest rock we find, and bare fucking hands.

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

Hungry dogs. Don't forget, we have a lot of options.

[–] PizzaLamp25@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Five finger discounts are always a good sale

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago

...annnd they're plastic

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Like selling shovels in a gold rush

[–] spamspeicher@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago

GPUs while AI enshitification.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Folks, I’d like to remind every that history is written by the winners.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I call bullshit. Of course a historian would tell you that writing history doesn't make you a loser.

Always consider the source. taps forehead

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think my message was more or less, stop worrying about the price of the pitchforks. Just take them because if don’t fix this soon, history will see this as the time we failed to rise up against fascists because we couldn’t afford pitchforks as an excuse.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

You're not wrong, I was just being funny.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

...annnd they're plastic

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Knives, axes, sledgehammers, chainsaws, pickaxes. Your local Home Depot has all the tools for the DIYer in your life. Pick up a new present today.

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 1 points 2 days ago

Well if plan is to be a mob and demonstrate. You can first be a mob and steal from. Home depot.

Nothing forces guns to hold their value like tighter gun laws. I know collectors that get excited about it.