this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
97 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7854 readers
438 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
97
Trump administration sues California over law keeping oil wells from homes, schools (www.latimes.com)
submitted 4 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived copies of the article

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wasn't that the whole point of the Venezuela bullshit? To steal their oil? If we're doing that then why would we need to poison homes and schools by building new wells?

Does he realize that if we start extracting every drop of oil we can from every source, its going to tank oil prices, which means less money will be made.

Pedo Fucktard doesn't even seem to understand what he's doing, or basic economic principals...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Because they're in LA. no other reason.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 8 points 4 days ago

Reminds me of

"What's a little fallout?"

"What's a little fallout?"

[–] juliebean@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

a pumpjack on every playground and a offshore drilling rig in every bathtub!

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a plan for benzene in every butt

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Just tuck your socks into your pants when the rats come running and you'll be fine

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do oil companies even want to develop those sites? I was under the impression they don’t really want to build out a lot of new infrastructure for a market moving toward shrinkage..? Is this high quality crude or something?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 days ago

The key thing is that this law substantially limits new wells inside Los Angeles, where oil fields are interspersed with neighborhoods.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Available reporting shows multiple, inconsistent tallies of Donald Trump’s litigation outcomes depending on scope (administration regulatory cases, state suits, private civil suits, settlements). For example, the Institute for Policy Integrity’s analysis — cited in Democracy Forward and CalMatters — found Trump’s administration lost 79 of 85 federal agency deregulatory/policy cases (a roughly 7% win rate for that narrow category) while CalMatters reported a roughly 31% win rate for suits filed against his rules in his first term

https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/donald-trump-lawsuit-win-loss-record-c0fdfc

[–] lnxtx@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

3,200 ft = 975.36 m