this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
172 points (98.3% liked)

News

37571 readers
1897 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In an extraordinary pushback against Pope Francis, some Catholic bishops in Africa, Poland and elsewhere say they will not implement the new Vatican policy allowing blessings for same-sex couples.

Others downplayed the policy approved this week by Francis as merely reaffirming the Vatican’s long-standing teaching about marriage being only a union between a man and a woman.

The reactions show how polarizing the issue remains and how Francis’ decade-long effort to make the church a more welcoming place for the LGBTQ+ community continues to spark resistance among traditionalist and conservative Catholic leaders.

Some of the strongest responses came from bishops in Africa, home to 265 million Catholics, or nearly a quarter of the world’s 1.3 billion Catholics. Many of those Catholics live and their churches operate in societies where homosexuality is condemned and outlawed.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nous@programming.dev 60 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Isn't, according to Catholics beliefs, the pope infallible? Is that not a core part of the religion that separates it from Protestants?

Are we about to witness a splitting of the Catholic church?

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

So papal infallibility only applies when they're speaking ex cathedra (from the throne). The only time that's happened was in 1950. It's more that daughter churches need to maintain a "catholic" (universal) church within established rites.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Only via ex cathedra i.e "from the chair." The catholic church has had an... interesting history when it comes to papal authority.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

"Rules for thee and rules for me." They hate gays more now than they love gods representative they decided. This is the steadfast "truth" we should all rally around and tell women what they can do with their bodies, when they can't even follow their own rules.

[–] Dangy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't there like twenty different sects of Catholicism already?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 7 points 2 years ago

Catholicism is itself a sect of the larger religion of Christianity. But yes, apparently there is a new Christian derived sect every second bigger town.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let the ex-Communications begin.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah. I was pretty sure the dude in the big hat that was they only direct link to God was infallible.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes and no.

They believe that the pope can be infallible, but only sometimes. And sometimes means twice. As in, it has only been used two times.

There is no set list of ex cathedra teachings, but that’s because there are only two, and both are about Mary: her Immaculate Conception (declared by Pope Pius IX in 1854 and grandfathered in after the First Vatican Council’s declaration of papal infallibility in 1870) and her bodily Assumption into heaven (declared by Pope Pius XII in 1950).

Based on precedent, your pope name seems like it needs to be "pius" to be eligible for infallibleness.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 years ago

An electric hybrid would be a great for a pope. Fuel efficiency in religion is important - even Jesus left with his disciples in one Accord.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Last I heard. But hey, I am no Theologian. (IANT). LoL

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh I am looking forward to a new era of anti-Popes.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you get a Pope and an Anti-Pope to have sex, ...

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

They annihilate each other in an incredible burst of energy.

[–] ChemicalPilgrim@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Yeah, if the church wants to survive it'll have to adapt, but there are too many people who think the church never changes and that their angry childhood nun was the voice of god.

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Aren't all Catholic bishops confused? Like, inherently? It's a prerequisite for the job.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They are playing to their people

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm waiting for all the Trump-supporting Catholic Bishops in the U.S. to start their own American Catholic Church at this point.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think is going to be hard nowadays when property rights are pretty stabilized. In ancient times a bishop deciding to go for his own would could have a chance to keep the real state and accounts of the church they administer, nowdays the Vatican could easily send their lawyers to whatever place is trying to independence and kick them off their land.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I'd absolutely love to see that.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Instead of a normal cross they can just adopt the swastika

[–] kpw@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Can we make the Swastika a Buddhist symbol again?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just say the Vatican won't sweep their next homesexual pedo episode under the table, that'll bring them in line.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ah the Kevin Spacey tactic

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

So… further proof of the cherry-picking of Christianity.

[–] weird_nugget@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Why don't they go and fuck themselves?... Oh wait.

[–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

If any of you bothered to read the actual document, it says no blessing homosexual unions or anything that resembles them. The media is reporting everything way out of context and you are along for the ride.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

If we're going to be a Nation governed by the Bible doesn't that mean we have to listen to the Pope? Or do we pick and choose which parts of our religion we follow and kill the people who follow the Pope who sings the Word of God?