this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
231 points (96.4% liked)

You Should Know

43460 readers
1969 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The impact that wiped out the dinosaurs also wiped out all songbirds, except for in (ark) Australia. Australian songbirds then spread out to rest of the planet.

The closest living descendents (aka basal lineages) are the Lyrebird and the Rufus scrub bird. The lyrebird's song is a mixture of its own song and other birds songs. They have been also been known to mimic chainsaws, car alarms, camera shutters, and human speech.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Imagine a 10' tall lyrebird roaming free thru the streets....honking, pretending to be a camera, an ambulance, a fire truck.

At night it keeps repeating parts of the news...."and the president will invade Eur! And the p..."

My best guess is that's why we don't see any of those things these days. Someone or something got pissed.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Song birds must have been much larger in prehistoric times I assume. Maybe not 11' tall but what about the size of a crow or a dog? Imagine chirping so loud you can still hear it if you close your doors.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Australia has song birds about the size of a crow, they're called Magpies. They are at times aggressively territorial, extremely intelligent, family orientated and very pleasant to wake up to in the morning.

[–] Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, like that, but with constant song bird singing.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Thought the thumbnail said Song Bogan.

[–] who@feddit.org 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You should know! I consider it important information that is necessary for life, as now you get to imagine every songbird tossing in a "cunt" or "good on ya" while twittering away.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I was considering deleting this because of some reports but you know what? Miles O'Brien has a point, the post stands. Carry on and thank you for your service to Starfleet.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My thought is that it also implies that there's a good chance dinosaurs sang.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

A brightly feathered, singing T-Rex is the thought I can't stop giggling about.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Equally valid as both

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Love it. I will from now on imagine every song bird as singing in an Australian accent.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean not to nitpick but there are (were?) hundreds of aboriginal languages, none of which were related to the colonialist accent. And they were there for like thousands of years. So like fuck these birds if they’re speaking English tbh

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To suggest a bird should confirm to a culture is insane. To the birds, both indigenous and colonial cultures would be a drop in the ocean compared to what they've seen.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Sorry, it was tongue in cheek! But Christ now I wonder what they’ve seen o_0

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every morning they're screaming "g'day, mate!"

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 7 points 1 week ago

More like “Wanna root?”

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're screaming something! Torresian Crows, Pied Currawongs, Noisy Miners, every morning they're around my yard yelling at the top of their little lungs!

[–] Chef_Boyargee@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I’ve got a gaggle of kookaburras in the neighborhood too. Only a few lorikeets and an occasional cockatoo.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, all birds who went extinct back then also still had a common ancestor somewhere, all life on earth does.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's plenty of convergent evolution. Plants keep evolving into trees, so there isn't a single origin for them. Crustaceans keep evolving into crabs.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There’s a single origin for everything. It doesn’t matter how many times the descendants of that common ancestor have diverged and reconverged.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
  1. You're talking about a different subject than me.
  2. There's no consensus for what you're saying.

1: You're talking about whether a common ancestor exists for all life, I'm talking about common ancestor for a trait (e.g. tree bark, bird song, these are traits and not organisms).

2: There's current debate on whether life emerged multiple times or if it was only once. There's evidence for both and it's not a settled debate.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
  1. If that’s so, then that’s not what you said. You said “plants keep evolving into trees”. While it’s true that we give the name “trees” to a variety of plants with different genetics, all of them share a common ancestor: otherwise they wouldn’t be plants but something else.
[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Always and eternal is the carsinisation cycle. One glorious day we too will realize the optimal form and shuffle sideways into Nirvana. Together, as a species, we will snip the ties of suffering that bind us to this samsara.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Craaab people, craaab people♫

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, what about Australia made all the birds sing?

[–] foxymulder@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

screaming out of anxiety at all the stuff that can kill them.

but in a pretty soprano voice

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Being far away from chicxulub

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz -4 points 1 week ago

That's nice and all for a science or bird community. Not here, though.