this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
748 points (99.5% liked)

politics

27480 readers
3135 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago

Did you see how they all backed up into an evenly spaced firing squad, and executed him? They TRAINED for that. They've been given order to get in front of a blocked car, and if it moves, kill the driver. That's why he walked all the way around the car that day, carefully documenting it.

They were also ordered that if anyone is spotted with a gun, kill him immediately, and we see how they've been trained to do that.

Both of those deaths were first-degree murder, and it's likely that SHE gave those orders, likely passed down from Stephen "PeeWee" Himmler Miller. She knows this isn't going the way they thought it would - that people would be intimidated and stop protesting, and the exact opposite has happened. Americans don't take well to literal DEATH SQUADS.

Now she knows that she's likely in the hot seat for a life sentence in prison, possibly even the death penalty, and she's not alone. There is a lot rising on them winning this Civil War, and they have the high ground, so we can expect them to get much worse, not better.

I'm waiting for the Black Panthers to show up open carrying assault weapons. That will be an interesting day.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

She doesn't need to answer. She's a traitor.

We have multiple videos from multiple angles proving he never touched his LEGAL firearm and then was disarmed before being executed.

Traitors don't get the benefit of the doubt. Arrest her and try her for treason, along with the executioners.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 15 points 1 day ago

She's afraid to continue lying. Odd.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kristi Noem is a lying liar who lies and shoots dogs

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

the dogs were clearly armed and ready to shoot first

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Hey! Don't bring whores into this! They don't deserve to pickup strays cause of this puppy killer.

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 day ago

She's a plastic-faced cunt

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Hey now, I've known plenty of whores who are fine and lovely people. At least they give something positive to the world. Noem, not so much.

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Whore is much too polite of a word to be used in addressing this rotten hag.

[–] tartarin@reddthat.com 23 points 1 day ago

We all know they did, we saw it from many angles.

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In case it's not clear republicans are not good people and should be shown nothing but scorn.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can substitute "Republicans" for "Fascists". They're interchangeable now.

[–] xxam925@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I think republicans is a much better moniker. It indicates exactly who we are talking about.

Your “friends” and family members. All the people who voted for and continue to support this. The people on your socials who continuously move the goalposts and argue in bad faith.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 197 points 2 days ago (9 children)

We literally saw it happen. Why does the media pretend that this is a reasonable answer?

[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 99 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because a handful of billionaires own the media companies that own all the other media companies.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any solution to this mess will include making sure that there are no more billionaires.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

Waiter! Another Luigi please!!

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

From what I've seen, the media knows the answer and the story is more how the administration refuses to answer rather than the answer itself.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Party told you to ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because they're a bunch of cowards that can't be bothered with the lawsuits they'd have to fight for telling the truth, not to mention the preservation of their precious access to Jabba and his palace.

Bunch of fucking losers.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every time she's on camera she knows a soundbite might make its way to the ears of the cult she depends on, so she won't give any soundbites that go against the cult's mentality such as factual evidence. She also know her time is up and will be in a court sooner rather than later

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Because we've always been at war with Oceania. If the media doesn't toe the party's line Donald Trump will sue them for five billion dollars. Because we've always been at war with Eurasia.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know why she has all that plastic surgery, to get rid of her Pinocchio nose when she lies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pimpampoom@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope those people go in front of the court to be put in prison if all this ends.

[–] TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] pimpampoom@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Sounds lovely

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 116 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Surprised she refused to answer - it's not like she's reluctant to flat out lie most of the time.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

She knows she's going on trial and knows the facts work against anything she would say if she actually attempted to answer the question because she cannot tell the truth. She's betting on the cult to bail her out, therefore she wont give any soundbites that the cultists would not want to hear, such as facts

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

She's banking on a Trump pardon, since justice is meaningless to an evil king. We need a presidential impeachment in order to start getting justice for Pretti.

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Because she wants people to know that you can be shot while disarmed. That just being against them means they can kill you.

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to the day when she has a noose around her throat.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

The plastic recycling industry is looking forward to that day too

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 125 points 2 days ago (4 children)

peaceful protester that shows up with a gun and ammunition rather than a sign.

Kyle Rittenhouse? At least by their own logic.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most of January 6th traitors too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Exactly! When it’s a Rittenhouse, it’s a ‘citizen protecting property and defending themselves’, when it’s a Pretti it’s a ‘violent protester attempting to obstruct and massacre law enforcement’.

We are not the same, and they are saying it too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

It’s clear they did. And she knows it.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago

Pics and video receipts, bitch

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She can’t answer because they did disarm, then murdered him in cold blood,with NINE fucking shots.

They then walked away like it was a Sunday brunch and left someone else to clean their mess.

America is now run by Nazi fucking scum.

Americans are being gaslit repeatedly by people who align with a child rapist than their American citizens.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

America is now run by Nazi fucking scum.

Now? They've only dropped their masks (figuratively).

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (16 children)

When are we going to learn that strongly worded letters and protests that turn us into a shooting gallery are not a winning strategy? How many good men and women need to get assassinated before we try something different, anything different?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (24 children)

Have you read any American history? This is a pattern.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›