this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
321 points (99.4% liked)

Europe

9307 readers
1381 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbass@piefed.social 153 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He looks like every single rich asshole rapist in a movie.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] trslim@pawb.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

it kinda sucks that his actor did such a great job playing Jeoffry, the actor is actually super nice.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

I think it's ok. I hate Jeoffry, not the actor. Think he did a stellar job and would totally get a picture with him kicking my shin or something.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

After seeing this picture I'm actually curious how much inbreeding is there in the Norwegian Royal Family.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

It literally takes you two seconds of research to learn that this guy isn't royal by blood. Even something as simple as reading the article would tell you that he is the crown princess' son from a prior relationship.

But I guess it's easier to just spew some ignorant bs and start conspiracy theories about inbreeding in the Norwegian royal family.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

alls i'm saying is feeling the need to map out ypur bloodline is sus, the very act just makes me assume there's some level of inbreeding with all royalty. everyone knows muts are healthier longterm

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 1 points 2 minutes ago

Super weird to bring up bloodlines when the person in question isn't part of the royal family by blood. It's almost like you're trying to will it into being about inbreeding, which makes you the weirdo here.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

That's two seconds more than I'm willing to spend looking up a member of a royal family, any royal family.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

He's a step son, so any inbreeding would be a pre existing condition

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

He's not "royal blood" the crown prince is his step dad.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 11 points 1 day ago

Isn't he just married into the family or something?

[–] dumbass@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna go with, all of it.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The Norwegian royal family is not doing well. Norway's crown princess was also mentioned in the recent Epstein files dump. Apparently she had been texting with Epstein personally for many years.

Could this combination of cases could lead to the end of the royal family in Norway?

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Lazypasting something I wrote elsewhere:

Norwegian here, and I don't think it's gonna change a whole lot. Well, not for her, at least.

Personally I don't care enough about them, and I don't get the impression anyone else under 60 care that much either, neither positive or negative. Her husband is genuinely a nice person, so is her father in law (yes, I've met them both). Her son is a scumbag, though. (And he almost ran into me on a bicycle when he was 5 or so!)

So if anyone wants to litigate against her, I'm not gonna stand in the way, but for now this looks mostly like a case of "Should've known better", something several government officials have publicly stated.

Just to clarify my stance on monarchy: Conflicted. In theory it does make sense to have someone who can veto everything on behalf of the state if the government goes weapons grade guano. However, the apolitical nature of a monarch pretty much stand in the way of this. And on the other hand, I'm not a big fan of inherited power.
But all in all, I don't really care that much. Larger portions of my taxes go to stupider things.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In theory it does make sense to have someone who can veto everything on behalf of the state if the government goes weapons grade guano.

In Democratic countries which have a President but not a Presidential System (so, like Germany and Portugal, and unlike the US and France) that's basically the entirety of the power of the President.

Personally I vastly prefer a figurehead President who has at most limited to power to dissolve parliament (for when, as you say, "the government goes weapons grade guano") which gets actually chosen on a vote and kicked out if he or she turns out to be worse than they seemed before getting the position.

From the places I lived in, I above all detested the Constitutional Monarchy in Britain, with the Royal being filthy rich and a cornerstone of a web of patronage that was part of, if not most of, the reason why the country has massive class division and discrimination by European standards. My experience in The Netherlands was nowhere as bad, though.

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our king is ok. Just wants to fly jets.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Also used to use the tram like everybody else, back in the day.

Meanwhile in the UK there are actually laws just for the Royal Family, like the one that temporary closes parts of the airspace for the Royal Family Helicopter to pass through.

Mind you, this is far from the only way in which The Netherlands has a far, FAR, FAR more egalitarian spirit at all levels of society and laws than Britain, and I say this as somebody who has lived in both countries.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And as another Norwegian who already replied to you. I'm under 60, and so are my friends, and we care

Intentional power structures should be abolished. Otherwise they will inevitably lead to corruption. We need more democracy, not less

And it's not just treated as a "should have known better" in the media. They are calling it an acute crisis for the foundation of the institution. It's treated with great seriousness

What picture does it show the world when the family representing our country, that is literally living lavishly in a castle mind you, is mired in scandals, and we cannot exactly simply replace them because it's a monarchy?

[–] bossito@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Fingers crossed 🀞

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guaranteed that it will blow over in Norway. Norwegians are creatures of habit and strong traditionalists (partly because we're an aging populace). Most Norwegians can't imagine their country without the royal family, because the monarchy is so anchored in the national spirit.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is so odd considering how little tradition and history the Norwegian monarchy really has comparatively speaking.

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

It's very much a manufactured one. In 1905, we stood there with our hard-earned independence after being under Danish and Swedish rule since the end of the black plague (the first being called "femhundreΓ₯rsnatten" - the five hundred year long night). We asked the son of the Danish crown prince if he would like to reign in Norway, he said he would only do it if it was decided through referendum. The modern Norwegian royals have no connection to the Norwegian kings of old, but are part of the house of Schleswig-Holstein and Mountbatten-Windsor.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 18 points 1 day ago

Doubtful. She’s only royal by marriage. More likely they jettison her like the British royals did to Diana or Andrew.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The lesson for princes: Do not marry a commoner.

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The lesson for commoners: do not allow princes to marry

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That has so far worked out for the Danish King who married an Australian commoner, and from Tasmania nonetheless.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just glad that our royal family is for the most part pretty wholesome and boring.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

~~Your royal family would never been better if Christopher Lee married into it that one time.~~

Edit remembered this fact entirely wrong

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The what now? XD I don't recall Christpher Lee almost marrying into the Danish royal family. Unless Queen Margrethe has a few more secrets up her sleeve, other than being the one illustrator of Lord of the Rings whom Tolkien thought got it right.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I'm totally wrong. Sorry I misremembered this entirely wrong.

The Carandinis, Lee's maternal ancestors, were given the right to bear the coat of arms of the Holy Roman Empire by the Emperor Frederick Barbarossa.[8][118]

In the late 1950s, Lee was engaged to Countess Henriette Ewa Agnes von Rosen, whom he had met at a nightclub in Stockholm.[160] Her father, Count Fritz von Rosen, proved demanding, getting them to delay the wedding for a year, asking his London-based friends to interview Lee, hiring private detectives to investigate him, and asking Lee to provide him with references, which Lee obtained from Douglas Fairbanks Jr., John Boulting, and Joe Jackson.[161] Lee found the meeting of her extended family to be like something from a surrealist Luis BuΓ±uel film, and thought they were "killing me with cream."[162] Finally, Lee needed the permission of King Gustaf VI of Sweden to marry. Lee had met him some years before while filming Tales of Hans Anderson, where he received his blessing.[162] Shortly before the wedding, Lee ended the engagement. He was concerned that his financial insecurity in his chosen profession meant that she "deserved better" than being "pitched into the dishevelled world of an actor." She understood, and they called the wedding off.[163]

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's such a humongous wanker. Joffrey was supposed to be a cautionary tale, not a source of inspiration.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

First moments I was like: wait, it’s Jeffrey. But then!.. yeah, he looks so much Joffrey, lol!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Does that guy reflect the Norwegian version of having "breeding" or is it more a case of too much inbreeding?

[–] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

Marius Borg Hoiby, Mette-Marit's 29-year-old son from a relationship before she married Crown Prince Haakon, has been charged with a total of 38 counts, some of which date back to 2018.

Inbreeding I don’t know, but not royal inbreeding in this case.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that how his head normally looks?

[–] lol_idk@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)