this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
362 points (98.1% liked)

News

23259 readers
3316 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Mooothers day!

[–] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The CEO and CTO duo of success

[–] Ab_intra@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (4 children)

We've had this for plastic bottles forever here in Norway.

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

Same in California for most beverage cans and bottles. It's specifically the wine and liquor containers that are new.

[–] timkmz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Same in Germany+glass beer bottles. But still not on other alcohol lol

[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they don't want you to come back to the store after you emptied that vodka bottle.

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

For glass it's about standardized refillable bottles. Most eine and spirits come in a variety of bottles depending on origin and are generally not meant to be refilled.

[–] MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In Denmark it's on plastic, aluminum, glass, pretty much anything that can be recycled.

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's also common in many states including California for cans, plastic bottles, and many glass bottles but this particular measure adds more types like wine and liquor bottles and pouches

[–] neurogenesis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Moving from CA to a place with no aluminum recycling was initially weird, then my city completely stopped picking up all recycling... because staff shortages, so the world is full of surprises (guess what else they outlawed here..)

[–] hpca01@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] neurogenesis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, nah, something about womens bodies... pretty wack

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Where though? I haven’t seen cash refund kiosks for years.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

One other thing: in CA most stores not near a recycling center are required to take them back and refund you in store.

See https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/BevContainer/InStoreRedemption for the list of stores for your zip.

I've done this at Walmart, Safeway, Walgreens, Sams, etc. lots of stores are on that list, and most people don't know. Worst case, ask for a manager, they should know. Also the stores have a sign at the entrance window telling you that they take stuff for CRV. You don't need to have bought it there.

It's much better than finding a place, sorting, weighing, etc

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Oh neat, let’s see what we have

“No records found.”

I sort of feel Rick rolled.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here in Germany we have Pfand system to return our bottles and get our cash back since 2003.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In my Canadian province, a mandatory deposit has been in place since 1970. I didn't even realize this wasn't standard elsewhere.

[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

They are introducing this in Ireland in 2024. Starting with cans and hard plastic containers. I think it's a great idea. I do hope they expand it to include glass bottles though.

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a quarter for boxed wine!! Really though, this title is misleading. It should say "California Redemption Value deposit charge to be added to liquor and juice containers starting in January."

They add it to the price of the product at checkout, it's a "deposit" that you are able to get back if you want to save up your containers and drive them to the recycling center.

I see this mostly benefiting people who make a few dollars a day digging through public (and not so public) trash receptacles looking for things with CRV to turn in.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It pisses me off that we have to pay any fee at all when we aren't the ones who choose a product's packaging.

Companies should be paying the whole thing ... including recycling costs. Then maybe they'd start packaging responsibly.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

For things that can't be recycled, I would agree. But if it can be, then it still needs to be brought to a recycling facility to make that happen. Without this incentive, a lot more of it will end up in landfills.

[–] Electromechanical_Supergiant@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If the companies had to pay per bottle, do you really think they'd still be using single use packaging like that?

They'd install refill stations in stores and sell you a reusable bottle that you can fill up from their metered tap at the refill station.

Companies created the problem of single use packaging; the onus is not on individuals to solve a problem created by companies.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

If the companies had to pay per bottle, do you really think they’d still be using single use packaging like that?

If it's the same 5/10/25c per container, then they very likely will. Consumers have already decided that this price is worth paying for the convenience, so it makes little difference if companies paid this and passed on the cost to consumer, or if it's transparently shown as a separate reimbursable fee. In the end, all the costs get passed on to consumers and it's left to us to vote with our wallets. I think the main issue is that the cost of producing containers doesn't reflect the true long term cost, and the solution to that is probably to impose a tax based on the amount of material used. That way, consumers making the choice that's right for them will also mean making the choice that's right for everyone else.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Glass and metal are pretty reusable 😅

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago

Have you kept and reused every glass or metal container you've had?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Challenge accepted.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

I was trading empty bottles and jars for some money since I was a kid in Estonia. That system is older than the Russian Federation.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Make a free refill program instead ;)