this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
352 points (93.8% liked)

Science Memes

18851 readers
2084 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

NASA joke board. I've seen these type of boards all over. The best one was a board in a fiber splicing trailer.

It outlined a procedure in case you were ever lost in the woods. It involved pulling a one foot section of fiber out of your back pack and burying it. Then you just had to wait until a backhoe came through and cut it in half. You were supposed to follow the backhoe back out.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wait I need a copy of that one on unexpected wobbling in non-wobbling systems, I need to up my ksp game

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Beware the Kraken.

[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 24 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately not real, I would have loved to read into some of them.

[–] Sphks@jlai.lu 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This one from the US government won an Ignobel : https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-12-480r

As “a report about reports about reports that recommends the preparation of a report about the report about reports about reports.”

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Managers love this one trick

[–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

I’m intrigued by the wobble in a non-wobbling system. Perhaps referring to my dancing style?

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

thank you OP for allowing me the opportunity to read this entire image here on lemmy prior to seeing the creator's mastodon username, so that i could believe it was real for a minute :)

(for anyone unfamiliar with it, check out her other amazing work...)

also ping and thankyou to @NanoRaptor@bitbang.social (in case mentions on lemmy notify mastodon users?)

[–] teft@piefed.social 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Cognitive load of nested acronyms looks interesting. GNU is one that bakes my noodle.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

That one feels the most relatable as one who works in tech. Everything is an acronym, man, and most have no idea what the acronym stands for.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

It's acronyms referring to other acronyms... I don't think GNU qualifies.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

GNU is a recursive acronym representing GNU's Not UNIX.

UNIX is a modified acronym representing UNiplexed Information Computing System (UNICS)

G(NU's Not Uniplexed Information Computing System) Not Uniplexed Information Computing System

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

GTKMM is also GTK--

GTK is the GIMP Tool Kit

GIMP is the GNU Image Manipulation Program

GNU is GNU's Not UNIX

UNIX is UNiplexed Information Computing System

Ergo: GTKMM stands for G(NU's Not Uniplexed Information Computing System) Not Uniplexed Information Computing System Image Manipulation Program Toolkit Minus Minus.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago

What's GNU with you?

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

What about Hird of Unix-Replacing Daemons referring to Hurd of Interfaces Representing Depth?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fake as fuck, unfortunately. NASA-TN-D-7110, for example (second row, third column) is actually titled "Minimizing the area required for time constants in integrated circuits".

[–] lath@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Half of those are jabs at management, the other half are reasonable experiments.

[–] Sphks@jlai.lu 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would love to see some of them, like the systems never intended to work (bottom left).

[–] grue@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure they are as real as OP claims, unfortunately. I looked up NASA-TN-D-6193 for you, but its actual title is "Dynamic and static wind tunnel tests of a flow direction vane".

Edit: happily, the content of the paper really is about formalizing the performance rating of a device that had been used in conditions beyond its original intended use.

[–] Sphks@jlai.lu 12 points 1 day ago

Thanks. I am sad now.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I also looked three of them up on the NASA Technical Report Server and got other results.

Edit: titles are funny, papers are real

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Did you really get other results, or did you get papers that were still accurately described by the editorialized titles? On the one I looked up, the author and publication date were the same, and it really was about "the repeated survival of systems never intended to work [under the more extreme than designed conditions they were subjected to]" even if the actual title wasn't that spicy.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh shit, i didn't consider that... I'll look again later tonight. I wanted to check out the wobbly one. lol

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Meme title: "Preliminary analysis of unexpected wobble in a rigidly non-wobbling system"

Actual title: "Analysis of the dynamic response of a supersonic inlet to flow-field perturbations upstream of the normal shock"

The design of these shock-position control systems requires knowledge of the shock-position dynamic response to perturbations in the inlet.

They need to control the position of the shockwave in the inlet ducts of supersonic craft using variable geometry ducting. To have precise control they need to understand how the unintended wobbling of the non-wobbling system affects the shockwave.

Seems to check out.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Haha that rocks, thank you for pulling through as well!!

[–] meow@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 1 day ago

"Were just throwing science at the wall here to see what sticks" - Cave Johnson, shower curtain salesman of 1943

I bet they just needed to do something, and they had ideas.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I looked multiple of these up on the NASA Technical Report Server and got other results.

Edit: titles are funny, papers are real

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The clipboard thing is wild. You can go almost anywhere with a clipboard and a lab coat.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 16 hours ago

You need a laminated ID on a lanyard, too.

Have a clicky pen, and click it constantly.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Make it clipboard, reflective vest, and hard hat for construction sites.

Clipboard and tracksuit for the training grounds of sportball teams.

Clipboard and ridiculously expensive tracksuit for Silicon Valley.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

If you carry a ladder, they even open doors for you.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

Obviously fake Nerd Humor.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The meetings ine is the silliest-sounding one, but maybe they mean collision of two materials or more, rather than setting a rock on the table in the board room.

"Preliminary analysis of unexpected wobble in a rigidly non-wobbling system" is about that time when Simone Biles got the yips 😉