this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
318 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

15382 readers
1312 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rune_Walsh@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago

Jane Raybauld, a Democrat, pushed for this because her family owns grocery stores that employ minors. She's a piece of shit.

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago

I guess the GOP wants to fuck the teens in more ways than one

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Work is work, age shouldn't have a damn thing to do with wages.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

Meanwhile, when I was a teen I had to pay bills and rent, and I was paid MUCH MORE than kids are today (inflation).

But fuck teens, right? Oh, and you're drafted womp womp

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

More MAGA winning. This is exactly what MAGA wants to do on a national level.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 12 points 15 hours ago

Children working for low wages: truly a show of a thriving state and a Great America /s

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 104 points 21 hours ago

Voting Republican has consequences.

If you think your kids hated you before, let's see how they like you now.

[–] BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world 61 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

As a teenager, this would have motivated me to do crime. You aren't going to pay fairly? I'm going to make money unfairly. Anyone who pays under minimum wage would get retribution. Also, kids should band together and not work at these places. And rob them.

[–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Hell yeah. Nice to here some of your generation being sick of this shit.

[–] BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago

Lol no wonder. Read it wrong. I've done community activism in my city and the young people don't seem to have that bite in them. Guess I just got happy for a second.

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 28 points 19 hours ago

Cant vote but can be worked to death for poverty wages - just one more form of legal slavery

[–] Nednarb44@lemmy.world 65 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 78 points 21 hours ago

You see, teens aren't people. They're animals owned by their parents. So some of the money goes to animal care costs.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Now implement price controls.

[–] zout@fedia.io 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Like I said in another thread, this has been the case in the Netherlands for at least since the eighties (€4,32 an hour if you're 15, still below €10 if you're 19) . And employers abuse the shit out of it, hiring young people as cheap labour and trying to get rid of them before they turn 21.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Wtf, only 30% of the minimum wage for being 15? What exactly is the company supposed to do with the other 70% to justify that?

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago

The justification once was that young people couldn't get a job if someone more experienced would get the same pay.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 38 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

that's bad, my state only follows federal minimum wage, so that's $7.25 for everybody

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, the additional costs spared and their consequences for livehood:

If you're a normal/poor person: scraping by -> can't even live paycheck to paycheck anymore

If you're somewhat affluent: okay -> scraping by

If you're a billionnaire: excellent -> excellent (nothing changes)

To be part of the 1%, in the United States you'll need about $USD 6 million. Though living off from money only (i.e. without wage labour) is already "achievable" by $2 million, you then make about $100k a year with a 5% interest if in stocks.

All ye who are not part of the 1%, are the proletariat. Ye who depend on the oligarch have nothing to lose, but a world to gain.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 2 points 18 hours ago

You could almost say we have nothing to lose but our chains.

[–] rottenmummy@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

conservative is to be backwards

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

One state isn't other 49. Don't lump the backwards with the rest of us.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Who's your president, again?

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

Gregory Bananas

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 11 points 18 hours ago

Imagine how many of them are parents themselves, just fuck over 2 generations at once.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I don't really have an issue with this. At $25 an hour, 10% less for actual teenagers is fair.

Wait, did you say $15?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago

yeah it should at the least be the opposite and raise minimum wage for non teenages. Its low enough.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 4 points 18 hours ago

Well at least 9/10 is better than 3/5, if we're comparing shit sandwiches.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

How many affected by this aren't even capable of voting? Fucking evil.

[–] BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'll say what I said on another thread. At least it's still higher than their age of consent.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

$13.50 is less than 16 years of age? How does that math work? Is it $2 per year or is there some other formula you're using?

Age of consent in Nebraska, USA is 16. This is easily Googleable (I used DDG though, which uses Bing on the back end). Here's the top result: https://www.ageofconsent.net/states/nebraska

P.S. I broke out the calculator to justify your original statement. To get 15.9 as an age (lower than the age of consent in Nebraska, USA), you would have to consider $1.18 to be the value of each year. In other words, if you really did want to compare $13.50 an hour to an age that is lower than the minimum age of consent (I used 15.9), you would have to value each year to be worth $1.18. Or each dollar to be worth 1.18 years. I'm not sure. I'm not great at math. Maybe someone else can explain that better. I tried to make your argument make sense!

(I think you were trying to say that Nebraska's age of consent is 13, but you didn't think anybody would go look it up.)

[–] BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It's a joke. It was a dig at their ass backwards culture of anti-education and intrafamiliar breeding.

You are absolutely correct I didn't think anyone would go look it up, because it was a joke.