this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
177 points (89.0% liked)

News

30790 readers
2690 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 105 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Great, just what we needed, more billionaires...

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago

But this time... it's a woman! Progress! /s

[–] FattestMattest@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

She was already a billionaire. Just not a hundred billionaire.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 63 points 2 years ago

And she got it the old fashioned way - inheritance.

[–] tacomafish12@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (1 children)

100 billion is such a disgusting number for wealth. Let's eat her, and the rest of them.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If I had a hundred billion dollars, I’d do two ladies at the same time.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

They’re too bitter. Kill them and buy groceries for an entire country.

[–] NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You'd think she would be happier.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If our sociopath billionaire class had the capacity to find happiness, they would have cashed in their chips and fucked off to indulge any hobbies/passions they had forever a long time ago.

They have a gaping "deposits only" black hole in their chests where a heart should be. It will never be enough, and unfortunately they use their power/capital to make their inadequacy everyone else's problem.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

To be fair this woman seems to already have done that, except for the cashing in her chips part.

[–] weasel5053@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

She’s angry that the poors still have some money.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The secret to rich people's happiness is philanthropy.

The problem is, too many of them are too stupid to realize that having more for themselves while children die of starvation isn't good for their conscience.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

All billionaires are unethical, greedy, exploitative assholes who don't deserve anything that they have.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is this supposed to be an achievement of some kind? Pretty sure there are many empresses/queens/czarinas etc that have inherited as much if not more

[–] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe adjusted for inflation, maybe…. but I seriously doubt it, 100 billion is an astronomically high amount.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even $100 billion is nothing compared to the power that comes from controlling a nation state. Just in real estate terms, $100 billion is enough to maybe buy a really small city if no one noticed what you are doing. To control a whole country of land, people, and wealth is incomparable to anything achievable in capitalism.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't buy mcdonalds with control over a nation state

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not in modern times, but the ancient world was a different beast

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Yes. It's okay if white women exploit humans, not okay when white men do it.

[–] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

May something unexpected and sudden happen to all billionaires.

[–] Land_Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Like inheritance? I don't think they are in need of any more.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I'm guessing that was rather expected.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can't fool me. That's Steven Tyler. And he looks pretty pissed about the confusion.

[–] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Dude looks like a lady!

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You may not like it, but this is what a no avacado toast lifestyle looks like.

/s

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

"well done". Has taken a lot of hard waiting to get there! "she's worth it"

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Her name is probably already in the national urinal commentary monument:

https://lemmy.world/comment/6305060

She's got a good 5 years to go. Selling cancer causing nano materials to women is evil.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thought exercise: if this person suddenly died would there be a significant positive impact to the economy?

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Her descendants would get the fortune, if there are none then her will likely spreads it to enough other entities that the government gets nothing more than the estate tax laws demand. You won’t see billionaires die and the money go unclaimed to the state like you do with poors that die with a few thousand in assets

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

No, but raising her taxes would.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[–] vamp07@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I don't think that most people that inherit that level of wealth end up very happy. Everyone has problems. The more $$ you have the more you focus on the stupid meaningless stuff.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Wow. A study of the Bible and the genealogy of the Greek gods. She totally worked hard to "earn" that $100 billion.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Anyone else hungry?

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Nice, now she'll be able to easily afford peon destroying robot dogs