this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
291 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28242 readers
3749 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The National Governors Association (NGA) has canceled its annual White House meeting after President Trump only invited Republican governors to the gathering.

The yearly meeting is traditionally bipartisan and offers a chance for state leaders to convene with one another and the president.

“Because NGA’s mission is to represent all 55 governors, the Association is no longer serving as the facilitator for that event, and it is no longer included in our official program,” Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) wrote in a Monday letter announcing plans to forgo the meeting, according to The Associated Press.

Stitt said the Trump administration’s decision to exclude Democratic governors would not divide the association.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.social 115 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You know things are getting interesting when OKLAHOMA is acting as a voice of reason.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago

I’m pretty sure Stitt is just the current president of the NGA.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 104 points 4 days ago (1 children)

NGA’s mission is to represent all 55 governors

For anyone else wondering what's represented beyond the 50 states, the NGA's Governors page includes the governors of American Somoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All of which should be states IMO.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

American Samoa doesn't want to become a state because parts of the constitutions equality laws would erase part of their culture.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hot take: If your culture is grounded in inequality then it's not worth preserving.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah that's most peoples take, I don't necessarily agree, but that's just the reason. There was a big push at one point for statehood that mostly came from people stateside that used to live in American Samoa but it never got broad support by the people who live there.

A lot of it has to do with giving American foreigners rights and not wanting the island to be industrialized and pushed towards more tourism and M/Billionaires 10th vacation home.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago (2 children)

United States showing how we can fight against that fat orange fuck.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

This is fighting? Not holding an event? The bare minimum here is to host it and still invite everyone because that’s the entire point. Throwing the plan in the garbage and walking away isn’t fighting, especially when he’s getting his way pretty much everywhere and can just have his little Republican governors’ meeting whenever he wants otherwise.

Ya’ll need to redefine “fighting” because that’s the weakest shit I’ve ever seen.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How exactly does this fight him?

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He’s a narcissist. You’re depriving him of his narcissistic supply.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately it’s probable that the White House will just go ahead with the event anyways by having the Republican Governors (or as many as possible) have dinner with the president at the white house

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago

He's surrounded by yes men and has dementia. He probably doesn't even know this meeting was a thing. This is a whole bunch of nothing.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world -4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So you guys think Stitt isn't cradling the balls and jerking it behind closed doors? As in he doesn't feel like it's smart or time yet to fully divest of the charade?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah, only reason this is happening is because they would've run into legal problems trying to say this was a Governors Association dinner when their vice chair and about half their members objected

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is in fact possible to be both Republican and vehemently against the current regime. There are plenty of die-hard Republicans who have vocally hated Trump for the past decade.

That doesn't mean he has good politics, but you can have bad politics and still hate the out-and-out Nazis.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doubt. Only one I see is Massie.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This may be shocking to you, but there are actually Republicans who aren't members of Congress.

Just because MAGA has captured a majority of the party and therefore wins most of the primaries doesn't mean there are no non-MAGA republicans.

Also, there's Susan Collins in the Senate, so that's at least two.