this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
217 points (97.8% liked)

linuxmemes

30151 readers
1857 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Language/ัะทั‹ะบ/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • ย 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [โ€“] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago)

    IDK what y'all are on about. KDE + Khronkite uses very little RAM. There are a few background things you can disable if you donโ€™t need them to make it even leaner.

    It also just works, with so many integrations, all maintained for you.

    My brief foray into discrete WMs like Sway was nostop โ€œoh, it doesnโ€™t have a WiFi manager? Oh, no sharing? Oh, noโ€ฆโ€ and I ended up having to install a bunch of stuff manually, manually configure it all, tie them together with some scripts and services that break with updates, and find out I did a no-so-great job because I havenโ€™t spent literally thousands of man hours in integration and ended up using a lot of extra disk space and RAM anyway!

    Breathes.

    So yeah. Big DEs are nice. And lean, mostly.

    [โ€“] comador@lemmy.world 3 points 39 minutes ago

    XFCE for life.

    [โ€“] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 23 minutes ago

    XFCE has always seemed to cover most any "normal" desktop experience I've ever needed, still even beating Windows hands down (as if that's difficult, especially these days).

    Granted, I don't use KDE Connect or ... what ever else KDE has over XFCE. The styling options are fun, but I'm too old to care about style these days.

    I have NOT compared them to confirm any of the supposed lesser resource usage of XFCE, so if you're going to roast me, tell me why (preferrably with direct data so we can all know).

    [โ€“] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 2 points 30 minutes ago
    [โ€“] Rollade@lemmy.ml 49 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

    Unused ram is wasted ram. Change my mind

    [โ€“] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 39 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

    This applies when RAM is used as temporary cache or something that can be instantly freed the moment it is needed otherwise. This doesn't really work for justifying higher RAM use by KDE, unless you would never need that RAM for anything else anyway.

    I use KDE because it is good, though. Also I don't think KDE even uses more RAM than other DEs that are designed to be lightweight. Last time I compared, it used the same or less memory as LXDE.

    [โ€“] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

    Also I donโ€™t think KDE even uses more RAM than other DEs that are designed to be lightweight. Last time I compared, it used the same or less memory as LXDE.

    Yep. KDE is feature-rich, but it's also highly optimized these days, and the RAM usage is actually competitive with the best of them.

    You can get RAM usage lower on a very stripped down, barebones system, but if you want a full 'normal computer' desktop experience that has all the things you'd expect a computer to have, you'd be hard-pressed to find one that uses significantly less RAM than KDE. (Yes, there are some that get lower ... but not a lot lower. And unless you're running on some extremely limited hardware, are those extra 20MB of RAM really going to make a difference in your everyday life?)

    [โ€“] supermarkus@feddit.org 24 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Also I donโ€™t think KDE even uses more RAM than other DEs that are designed to be lightweight. Last time I compared, it used the same or less memory as LXDE.

    Firefox without any website loaded uses more RAM than a full Plasma session.

    [โ€“] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 hour ago

    And KDE can be even more efficient if you go into the settings and tweak things a bit, turning off some unnecessary features that are on by default.

    [โ€“] catdog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

    The difference being that in the one of those cases you still need to open a browser instance before you are able to browse the web.

    [โ€“] chellomere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

    Also, higher ram usage by programs makes it less likely that their actively used RAM (ie what it is actually currently using) fits in your CPUs caches, making them run slower.

    [โ€“] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 1 points 52 minutes ago

    I got plenty of ram. Weโ€™re using it.

    [โ€“] Ephera@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 hours ago

    It's just really oversimplifying memory usage. OS designers had that same thought decades ago already, so they introduced disk caching. If data gets loaded from disk, then it won't be erased from memory as soon as it isn't needed anymore. It's only erased, if something else requests memory and this happens to be the piece of "free" memory that the kernel thinks is the most expendable.

    For example, this is what the situation on my system looks like:

    free -h
                   total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
    Mem:            25Gi       9,8Gi       6,0Gi       586Mi       9,3Gi        15Gi
    

    Out of my 32 GiB physical RAM, 25 GiB happens to be usable by my applications, of which:

    • 9.8 GiB is actually reserved (used),
    • 9.2 GiB is currently in use for disk caching and buffers (buff/cache), and
    • only 6.1 GiB is actually unused (free).

    If you run cat /proc/meminfo, you can get an even more fine-grained listing.

    I'm sure, I could get the number for actually unused memory even lower, if I had started more applications since booting my laptop. Or as the Wikipedia article I linked above puts it:

    Usually, all physical memory not directly allocated to applications is used by the operating system for the page[/disk] cache.

    So, if you launch a memory-heavy application, it will generally cause memory used for disk caching to be cleared, which will slow the rest of your system down somewhat.

    Having said all that, I am on KDE myself. I do not believe, it's worth optimizing for the speed of the system, if you're sacrificing features that would speed up your usage of it. Hell, it ultimately comes down to how happy you are with your computer, so if it makes you happy, then even gaudy eye-candy can be the right investment.
    I just do not like these "unused RAM is wasted RAM" calls, because it is absolutely possible to implement few features while using lots of memory, and that does slow your system down unnecessarily.

    [โ€“] Dialectical_Specialist@quokk.au 4 points 3 hours ago (5 children)

    I read this same principle in an arch or gentoo forum/manual. I can't even think of an argument against it tho? Unused anything is wasted by definition isn't it? I know I'm missing something obvious somehow

    [โ€“] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

    The problem with the simplified phrase is that your computer is expected to run more than one program at a time.

    If you are only running one program, it should certainly use all the RAM of your system.

    However, your desktop, laptop, phone, tablet, game console, etc. all run hundreds or thousands of programs at the same time. Each individual application should optimize RAM usage so the whole system can work together.

    Another commenter in the chain talks about disk caching, which is what the phrase "unused ram is wasted ram" came from

    It's been coopted by application programmers who don't want to optimize their software

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [โ€“] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 22 points 3 hours ago

    yeah, kde is da best... i tried to use some of the others but kde just works so much better

    [โ€“] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    I just prefer tiling windows managers idk

    [โ€“] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 hours ago

    KDE Plasma can do that, too, via a KWinscript: https://codeberg.org/anametologin/Krohnkite ๐Ÿ™ƒ

    On a more serious note, this is a genuine recommendation. I've been using Krohnkite and similar scripts for a few years now, and they're absolutely fine, especially since Plasma 6 introduced a native, manual tiling mechanism, which they just have to configure.
    Especially for newbies wanting to try out tiling window management, without having to figure out a minimalist environment like a bare window manager, this is a great entrypoint IMHO.

    [โ€“] Dialectical_Specialist@quokk.au 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    right? I thought twms were almost exclusively for workflow efficiency only and this was like 15 years ago lol

    [โ€“] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

    They're for us dorks who like to like to chase efficiency in both screen real estate and keyboard navigation. A nice TWM combined with either a 21:9 or (my personal favorite) 16:18 ratio is pure bliss.

    [โ€“] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    Just give me more monitors and Iโ€™m happy.

    [โ€“] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    That's fine. I'm running two DualUps (16:18) with a TWM, and it's amazing. I wish they weren't a discontinued display, or else I'd add a third.

    [โ€“] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

    So that's effectively 2 monitors in a single case?

    Stop, I can only get so erect.

    [โ€“] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

    It's literally two panels without a bezel between. You can run full-screen with one input, or go into PIP mode and drive each individual panel with a different input.

    [โ€“] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

    And apparently discontinued. Goddammit.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [โ€“] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Ah, a fellow DualUp evangelist. it's a pity they didn't catch on that much.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [โ€“] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 16 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    It's astonishing how little RAM KDE needs for its features.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [โ€“] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

    Sponsored by swap

    [โ€“] exu@feditown.com 1 points 1 hour ago

    I got fed up doing the integration work for a window manager eventually and replicated my needs well enough with KDE.

    [โ€“] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    KDE is premier for a modern system, but I have a handful of low-power devices where XFCE or LXQt are a lot more useful despite disliking their interfaces.

    XFCE is great for mid-range old devices, and LXQt is great for dogshit old devices.

    [โ€“] supermarkus@feddit.org 9 points 3 hours ago

    XFCE is great for mid-range old devices, and LXQt is great for dogshit old devices.

    What's this device in your scale from old doghit to old mid-range?

    Runs a full Plasma session just fine. The problem isn't the desktop, it's the web browsers, especially Firefox. Falkon runs OK.

    [โ€“] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    I was actually just considering trying out a different DE like Cosmic or a compositor like Hyprland, but idk if itโ€™s just a โ€œgrass is greenerโ€ thing or not. KDEโ€™s got a lot going on for it and switching between QT and GTK is a pain, and Iโ€™ve never used a compositor so idk what to expect.

    [โ€“] Godort@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    I switched my work PC to Pop a couple months ago and seriously gave Cosmic a try.

    I had issues with it remembering screen positions and monitor settings would get reset to default on every boot. I installed KDE last week and it was like changing to a comfortable pair of shoes. Everything magically started working exactly how it should.

    [โ€“] lps2@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    Cosmic is still beta but I'm excited for it none-the-less as I use Gnome with all the cosmic extensions today. I just find that KDE feels dated and limited and Cosmics ease of customizability is very appealing

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [โ€“] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

    KDE is cool, but i was a heavy shortcut user even on Windows. Me discoovering Hyprland is akin to a drug-addict trying out heroine, because i can't go back now.

    [โ€“] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

    What shortcuts does Windows have that KDE doesn't?

    [โ€“] bigchungus@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    You've just convinced me to wipe my Arch install with SwayWM and go back to Fedora with KDE. I really just love all of the features that it has!

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [โ€“] Bonje@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

    Thats cool and all but hyprland and dank material shell are just too good for me to switch off of.

    [โ€“] vapeloki@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

    Moved from KDE to hyperland, while keeping some of the ecosystem, like KDE PIM, Dolphins, Okular and the other standard apps.

    Best decision for my daily work I made in a long time

    load more comments
    view more: next โ€บ