this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
47 points (91.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

41180 readers
612 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

military hospital doc versus special forces... Doc's more effective.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Depends on how methodical the killer is.

If they get caught the doctor wins, basically full stop.

[–] bricked@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

What if the doctor also saves the killer from prison?

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

Unnecessary plot twist:

The doctor is the killer!!! 😱😈😑

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago

Depends on who encounters more violent individuals right? I guess they both have demoted themselves to middle management and depend on the performance of others

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The killer

The doctor just keeps the amount of killers higher

[–] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes exactly. I don't understand the question, how is it even a competition?

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For instance: If the killers are killers for killing only one person and are killed by the metakiller after the fact. The doctor is saving lives while the killer is just adding kills without reducing the number of kills at any point.

As a general rule: Under the assumption that killers would not kill again after being declared killers then the doctor will always save more lives than the metakiller.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Turns out it's just one killer they both keep attacking and reviving.

[–] Toes@ani.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds vaguely like the plot of monster. Great anime. https://www.anime-planet.com/anime/monster

[–] genuineparts@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

Treating people can be a process depending on what ails them, Killing is a rather quick thing.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It depends on how many people the killers would kill after their iteration with the doctor or the metakiller.

To the number of total future victims you add the number of killers for the metakiller. Then to the number of total future victims you rest the number of killers for the doctor. You compare both numbers, the smallest number win.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Phenomenal shower thought, I have no idea how to answer though.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Depends on the killers the killer kills.

On an unrelated note, vaccinations save millions of lives every year.

Oh yeah, then there is this -> https://www.cgdev.org/blog/update-lives-lost-usaid-cuts

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Second would save more

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 3 weeks ago

The doctor would kill more people and the Serial killer killer would save more.

Each serial killer would have most likely gone on to kill more than 1 person, so the doctor would be responsible for more deaths.