this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
166 points (98.8% liked)

politics

28600 readers
3486 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal judge identified 210 orders issued in 143 cases in Minnesota in which he said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials had not complied with court orders.

The chief federal judge in Minnesota accused federal officials of continuing to disobey judicial orders related to immigration enforcement and then mischaracterizing the scope of their missteps.

The judge, Patrick Schiltz, threatened to hold government officials in criminal contempt if the pattern continued, writing in a scathing order on Thursday that, “one way or another, ICE will comply with this court’s orders.”

“The court is not aware of another occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten contempt — again and again and again — to force the United States government to comply with court orders,” wrote Judge Schiltz, who was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush.

MBFC
Archive

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The court is not aware of another occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten contempt — again and again and again

Stop threatening and do it

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

narrator: and yet they never did

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Reminder that Federal judges can deputize citizens to enforce their rulings. There were something like 80K park rangers that were fired from the National Park Service They already have most of the necessary training & certainly have more training than ICE goons.

[–] lunchbox2287@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's the problem. You've threatened again and again and again. Do it, cowards.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if they wanted to, they rely on Executive branch enforcement.

The US Marshalls need to be moved under the authority of the Judicial branch.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Force their hand. Either they enforce contempt charges or there's a wide open constitutional crisis.

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Let me break the news for you bud. We're already facing a wide open constitutional crisis. The 1st amendment has been broken in hundreds of instances along with the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th. Alex Pretti was murdered for exercising his 2nd amendment. Ordering federal enforcement agencies into specific states/cities breaks the 10th. Trying to end birth right citizenship broke the 14th. He's currently planning to break the 15th with a federal seizure of voting processes via a drafted executive order declaring a national state of emergency. The 19th is under attack by proof of identity voting laws that deny some women the right to vote based on mismatched identification between their birth certificate and state IDs with name changes from marriage. Its an open secret that he will push for a third term which would break the 20th and 22nd in addition to already attempting to break the 20th on Jan 6, 2020. And Voter ID laws constitute breaking the 24th.

So to summarize, that's 9 that he's already broken by my count and 4 he's actively trying to break. That's 13 of 27 and 7 of the original 10.

1 (broken) 2 (broken) 4 (broken) 5 (broken) 6 (broken) 8 (broken) 10 (broken) 14 (broken) 15 19 20 (broken) 22 24

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 19 hours ago

Oh I know all that. I've been calling fascism for years and catching a lot of shit for it early on.

But federal courts charging contempt and DoJ not enforcing it is much harder to ignore. That's why I modified it with "open".

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't judges have jurisdiction over the bailiffs in their courts? Issue a warrant, order them to organize a posse and haul them in to face consequences aka jail time.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yep. Deputize ME and let ME deal with this as The Law.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

'Another' being the guillotine?

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

ya sure.. when

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

This is what failing to enforce their orders has wrought for the judicial branch. ICE will continue ignoring them until judges start ordering their bailiffs to take these scumbags straight to jail from the courtroom.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Threatening it and not doing it is arguably worse than the crime itself. You are an accomplice until you do your fucking duty.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, we have to start protesting these judges for not doing anything. Feet to the fire. They're on the right track, but nothing is still fucking nothing.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

The fuck it will. Until you grow a god damn spine and actually issue contempt charges (and have them enforced), ICE is going to continue to wipe their asses with your 'orders' and the US Constitution.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 1 day ago

Patrick Joseph Schiltz (born July 6, 1960) is an American lawyer and jurist serving since 2022 as the chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. He was appointed to the Minnesota federal district court in 2006 by President George W. Bush.

Spine.... Found

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago

ICE will comply with this court’s orders

"make me"

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

They won’t.

Watch