this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
67 points (100.0% liked)

News

36160 readers
3686 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Holy shit, I thought the initial reporting of it just being a balloon was as embarrassing as the incident could get.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This is a second incident, if I'm reading it right. So CBP flew a drone over or near the airport and got the whole airport shut down, then did it again a couple of weeks later. They need their toys taken away.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think the first was a drone. Earlier reporting was that they wanted to test the laser by the airport, FAA said no. They started shooting at things anyway and came up with the balloon answer when first questioned by the press. There's no proof of a trespassing balloon or any otherl object as far as I know, though I imagine they would send up targets when test-firing. This seems like they got trigger happy again but since nobody at any of these agencies knows what the fuck they're doing, they shot someone's equipment out of the sky. Could have easily been a small plane instead.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Could have easily been a small plane instead

Couldn't it also cause problems for a large plane? I'm pretty sure if I shined my little green laser into the sky under the approach for a local airport I'd get a knock on the door pretty fast.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, but I'm assuming they didn't mean to shoot drone. They hopefully wouldn't mistake a passenger jet for a practice target.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

Oh. Jesus fucking christ.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 20 hours ago

🤡 on 🤡 violence

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Based military, I guess...?

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It was flying in their airspace and it didn't identify itself. So they shot the ~black man~ drone out of the sky.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

This was covered in the classes I took to get my Pt 107. Someone didn't look at their maps.

I bet they just found some guy who had his own DJI mini-2 and decided he was the drone guy.