this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
160 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28707 readers
2377 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 2 points 52 minutes ago

Okay...but first...death penalty for Epstein pedophiles. Then, we try every politician listed in those files for pedophile crimes. Try them, not necessarily convict...because they might be innocent...maybe...let the juries decide...then execute everyone found guilty of pedophilia with Epstein... I'm willing to bet - there won't be many Republicans left to pass laws like this.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

""The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don't resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don't ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don't bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn."

[Methodist Pastor David Barnhart]

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

The first part of this reads like a Carlin bit

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 32 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Actually God only demands a monetary fine if you cause a miscarriage in someone who didn’t want one (Exodus 21), and requires that you drink a potion that will give you a miscarriage if you got pregnant by someone who isn’t your husband (Numbers 5). If only those Republicans could read their own Bible, they would be very upset.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

That it is a monetary fine is really crucial as one of two ways of establishing that the Mosaic law that Christians leverage for their legalism does not consider an unborn fetus a person.

First, as noted, the fine for a miscarriage is monetary only if no harm comes to the woman. If the woman is hurt, the Mosaic concept of reciprocal justice (eye for eye, etc), which was likely borrowed from the code of Hammurabi, kicks in. The death of an unborn fetus has no reciprocal punishment because that form of justice applies to people.

The second way of establishing that an unborn fetus is not considered a person in the hebrew bible is right in the second version of the creation story in Genesis 2:7

then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being (emphasis mine)

So here first, and in various other places in the bible (and in the broader Greco-Roman culture in which the nascent Christianity would later form), life began at first breath.

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 5 points 6 hours ago

Please be aware that those are common misrepresentations of those texts popularised by the NIV translation.

Many translations show Exodus 21 demands life for life and a fine if the child survives but suffers injury. The NIV is one of several exceptions (although probably the most popular one) that instead translates it as a fine for a miscarriage (the original NASB also said this, but the 1995 revision corrected it).

Numbers 5 is a religious test and requires God to enact punishment. The "potion" has no abortifacient components and commentaries suggest that the punishment was infertility. The NIV is again an exception here suggesting miscarriage when most other translations (eg. NKJV, NASB, RSV, ESV, Amplified, Young's Literal, etc.) do not.

By all means call out their misuse of the Bible or their lack of consistency with it, but please be careful making claims like this -- it just undermines credibility.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

God says mandatory abortions apparently, hooo boy, Wes Groggins is sure gonna feel like a dope when he hears!

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 4 hours ago

but... but... my fictional imaginary friend said I get to kill people because they won't have my babies...

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 59 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

How much murder is it to bomb school kids in another country? We should seek the death penalty at the highest decision making levels for that.

[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago

God demands equal justice!

If they are already out of the womb AND not white? Then it's legitimate defense because they are terrorists.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Hmm? That's not "murder", murder is obviously not allowed? That's "defense". Their Jesus talked a lot about how important that was, just a minute lemme go find it...

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

Jesus explicitly did away with the whole "eye for an eye" thing...

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

"Pro-life" has never been about protecting life. It was always a means to control women.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Exactly, just like the freedom of religion has always been a way to prevent children from learning things!

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I just call it anti-choice.

[–] lolo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 hours ago

I call it “forced birth”.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Your God sure commits a lot of abortions for a pro-life guy. Maybe take that up with him first?

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, isn’t it something like one in four pregnancies actually makes it to term, naturally?

[–] ceiphas@feddit.org 7 points 7 hours ago

Two in three is more accurate, but that are still millions

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 28 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah, yes, I remember this part of the Bible. If I remember correctly, the Romans laughed when Jesus promised revenge. And then He jumped off the cross and killed every single person at Golgotha without mercy. And then He marched on Rome and decapitated Emperor Tiberius with His own hands for attempting to stop Jesus. They don't call Him "Vengeful Christ" for nothing.

It stands to reason, then, that the Republicans must exact revenge, as Jesus would've done.

[–] Sassington@feddit.uk 6 points 5 hours ago

I'm more enamoured by the last stand when Jesus was arrested.

When the Romans came to arrest Jesus with Malhcus, the high servant of the Jewish High Priest.

Peter drew his sword in defence of Jesus and severs Malhcus ear.

On seeing this Jesus responded 'The cup my father has given me is empty shall we fill it?"

He then put his hand on Malhcus and said "Suffer ye thus" and snapped Malhcus's neck with a sickening crack.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 0 points 2 hours ago

I feel like this is a good way to get violent insurrection from your population. If you start murdering peoples daughters and wives end masse people aren't gonna just throw up their hands and be like "oh well".

[–] doug@lemmy.today 27 points 9 hours ago

I hate this place.

[–] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you live in Missouri and have a daughter, you don’t love your daughter if you don’t leave Missouri.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

To be fair, one of the key ways the American South functions - has always functioned - is by trapping people into remaining there.

The systems (not just formal ones, informal ones are more impactful especially in the South) - have only "improved" to superficial degrees since chattel slavery, and are now granted roughly full permission to finally regress and remove the mask.

The rest of the country wonders "what the fuck is up with the misery, almost chosen to be self-sustaining, in the South? Why would anyone thoughtful stay there, why does it stay so bad, too, why don't they make fixes?".

It's always the systems in place that answer those discordant-seeming human choices, the contradictions.

The American South functions - and always has - by the systematic trapping and exploitation of its populace, to a degree always devastatingly more ugly than mere "modern capitalism".

So. A little grace, due, for those who can't just exit. They're working against ~everything. Personal details I can't relate here, but it's unimportant. The trap is, has always, been evident.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Lmao wtf, like 80+% of Christianity as a thing in the first place is JUST the way Jesus (and, in the telling and by extension - the entire New Testament...?! Hello?) supplants the barbaric nature of the Old.

Whole new covenant, and all? I mean I'm just a godless heathen, guess I oughta take my cues from...checks notes...ahem some horrible prick named Wes Groggins, who sure doesn't sound like a fictional character named to suggest the role "antagonist/heinous troll".

Cool Christians, cool stuff y'all got going on. Jesus would be all over this, just like, "wow, this is my kinda saving souls! Y'all are really killing it down here. Err..." 🙄

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

Everything that happens makes a whole lot more sense if you view Trump as the anti-Christ, and his following is the false prophets that I believe the Bible specifically warns about. (but to be fair I’ve mostly read condensed summaries on this)

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 hours ago

Psychopathic death cultists.

[–] Rinzler@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago