this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
242 points (98.4% liked)

News

36327 readers
3626 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court on Monday evening overturned a New York state court ruling that found that the Staten Island-based district of Republican US House Rep. Nicole Malliotakis discriminated against Black and Latino voters and needed to be redrawn. The Supreme Court’s intervention preserves a GOP-led seat that would have been likely to shift to Democrats this November.

The court’s ruling sets a disturbing precedent for voting rights in several ways. Federal courts are supposed to defer to state courts on matters of state law. And the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that courts should not change election laws in the middle of an election season, and in this instance the filing deadline for candidates in New York has already passed.

In her dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan, Justice Sonia Sotomayor blasted the court’s conservative majority for using one set of rules to uphold redistricting maps that benefit white voters and Republicans in states like Texas while using a completely different set of rules to strike down maps that benefit racial minorities and Democrats in places like New York.

“Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not interfere with state-court litigation,” Sotomayor wrote. “Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not meddle with state election laws ahead of an election. Today, the Court says: except for this one, except for this one, and except for this one.”

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmbientDread@piefed.social 30 points 17 hours ago

Same exception they used to hand GWB the 2000 election. Best court money can buy.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 79 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This just in: fascist asshole has a poor opinion on democracy. 

In other news, every 60 seconds, a minute passes in America.

[–] setsubyou@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

every 60 seconds, a minute passes

The last time a minute did not pass after 60 seconds was only in 2016 though, less than ten years ago

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 31 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

"get out and vote!"

GOP: "LOL yea... go ahead and 'vote'"

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 31 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They would not be fighting against voting if it were not a threat.

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

it's at least been refreshing that i haven't seen the "vOtE 3rD pArTy" dickwads skulking around spewing their shit lately, but maybe that's because i was more thorough in my instance blocking rampage with this account

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that voting 3rd party is a waste of a vote is the most pathetic thing about our so called democracy

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

As a Canadian I would argue that having a third party might bring some semblance of order to America's very limited 2-party choice.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the definition of "having" would be the key there. If the party 'exists' as just a consistent 10-15% of the vote, it 1) might as well not exist, and 2) will inevitably lead to the consistent win for whichever of the other two parties is more ideologically opposite.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is though if everyone stopped being a coward and voted for who they agree with instead of who they think would win a third party would easily become a 3rd of the vote.

The entire american population could 100% agree with a singular politician but not vote for them because "I dOn'T think tHeY CAn wIN."

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Ranked choice voting solves that problem, but that's a blue state thing

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They accomplished their goal, collected their Russian paychecks, and are waiting for instructions before dragging themselves back out of their holes.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 50 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Which is why anyone who voluntarily gives up the opportunity to vote is a fool, and anyone who encourages other people not to vote is malicious.

If voting truly had no impact, the GOP would not work so hard to prevent people from doing it.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 25 points 22 hours ago

Nor would they go out in droves for decades to participate in it and elect the lunatics they do.

Voting is real important.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 22 hours ago

Do it anyway.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why does this prick always look so red in the face? Its like Satan or Peter Thiel is controlling him about about to burst through his flesh at any moment.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Could be a sign of alcoholism.

I hope he gets (or has) cirrhosis and liver cancer 🥰

He’s a genuinely and unrepentantly evil shitstain.