this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
387 points (96.9% liked)

News

22903 readers
5346 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Kevin Hines regretted jumping off San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge the moment his hands released the rail and he plunged the equivalent of 25 stories into the Pacific Ocean, breaking his back.

Hines miraculously survived his suicide attempt at age 19 in September 2000 as he struggled with bipolar disorder, one of about 40 people who survived after jumping off the bridge.

Hines, his father, and a group of parents who lost their children to suicide at the bridge relentlessly advocated for a solution for two decades, meeting resistance from people who did not want to alter the iconic landmark with its sweeping views of the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay.

On Wednesday, they finally got their wish when officials announced that crews have installed stainless-steel nets on both sides of the 1.7-mile (2.7-kilometer) bridge.

“Had the net been there, I would have been stopped by the police and gotten the help I needed immediately and never broken my back, never shattered three vertebrae, and never been on this path I was on,” said Hines, now a suicide prevention advocate. “I’m so grateful that a small group of like-minded people never gave up on something so important.”

Nearly 2,000 people have plunged to their deaths since the bridge opened in 1937.

City officials approved the project more than a decade ago, and in 2018 work began on the 20-foot-wide (6-meter-wide) stainless steel mesh nets. But the efforts to complete them were repeatedly delayed until now.

The nets — placed 20 feet (6 meters) down from the bridge’s deck — are not visible from cars crossing the bridge. But pedestrians standing by the rails can see them. They were built with marine-grade stainless steel that can withstand the harsh environment that includes salt water, fog and strong winds that often envelop the striking orange structure at the mouth of the San Francisco Bay.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 102 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

How about instead of nets, we instead install a functioning mental health care system. This has ‘put bulletproof vests on school kids’ written all over it.

[–] Doxatek@mander.xyz 40 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Why not both haha. But yes I agree. 2k people killing themselves off this since it's open is insane

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

This says 4000 people died by suicide in California in one year. 2k people over almost 100 years isn't crazy. These nets won't make a dent in the yearly total.

[–] Doxatek@mander.xyz 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Damn. We gonna need a lot more nets then

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 months ago

We'll need nets around every handgun.

[–] Iunnrais@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The question is how many of those suicides were conducted by jumping off the bridge. And don’t say “they’d just choose another way to end themselves”. Studies and historical evidence shows that making suicide even slightly less convenient to perform actually does save lives. People get fixated on a method that seems easy. When that method is no longer easy, it gives them a chance to not go through with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Bulldoze the bridge and exterminate everyone.

No more suicides.

[–] sawdustprophet@midwest.social 6 points 8 months ago

Judge Death approves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Mental health care, but also better wealth distribution/quality of living for everyone.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, all the mental health care in the world doesn't mean jack shit when you're living paycheck to paycheck your entire life.

Mental health care professionals and their shills will of course say otherwise, though.

It's always about the money.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

All the mental healthcare in the world doesn't make the world a more acceptable living space.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 77 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The US government is going to do literally everything it can other than provide universal Healthcare until the country collapses.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait you're telling me this isn't what they meant by safety nets??

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The physical, not social kind. "We'll catch you when you fall... this is not a metaphor."

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I'm pretty sure California is in the process of implementing its own state-funded healthcare system.

It's the way to do it, just like with legalizing drugs.

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago

For real. It would be interesting to see the average financial depth of the people who attempt suicide in the US.

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Nets are cheaper than mental health care.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This reminds me of the time San Francisco decided to do something about it's human-feces-in-the-BART-escalator-wells problem, not by making public restrooms available to unsheltered folk, but building stupid awnings to keep people from pooping inside. The awnings cost more than the toilets would have and people just pooped on the sidewalks instead. ℹ️🫶🌉😀

[–] freebread@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Curious since I'm not familiar, how do the awnings prevent this? I went to SF a few years ago and there was a giant pile of human shit every 4 blocks so I'm not too surprised.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They basically close off the street level entrance when the transit isn't running. The escalators used to be open at the top and closed at the bottom during off hours, making a lovely little private pooping tunnel. The city budget people didn't GAF about the bio hazard or human dignity issues, they just didn't like that all the excrement kept breaking the escalators.

Old article from before they implemented them (the article mentions the budget proposal being $4 million, it's turned into $64 million and counting).

https://thebolditalic.com/why-is-there-so-much-human-shit-on-the-streets-the-bold-italic-san-francisco-ccaecdc7512

Friedenbach balked at the canopy proposal. “I find it interesting that they’re spending this much money on canopies when they could be using it to keep their bathrooms open.” More so, the money could be used for keeping the high-traffic drop-in centers operational. A few years back, San Francisco, under former-mayor Gavin Newsom’s authority, sought to cut over a million dollars in funding for many of the city’s highest-traffic drop-in centers. The Coalition for Homelessness wouldn’t stand for it. “We’d already seen almost half of the centers close,” Friedenbach recalled, “so we figured out how many pounds of feces the public facilities kept off the street.” Friedenbach and company estimated that the cost of cutting back or getting rid of drop-in centers altogether would be over 58,000 pounds of human feces on the streets of San Francisco.

[...]

Regarding the four million dollars spent on the canopy proposal, Friedenbach said, “You could capture a large amount of feces [with bathrooms], instead of the one shit a night you might be staving off with this.”

[–] Whirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

This guy Friedenbach sounds like he knows his shit.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

Old article from before they implemented them (the article mentions the budget proposal being $4 million, it's turned into $64 million and counting).


$4 million for one canopy.

FTA:

The canopy, still in prototype form, would be designed and built over the next two years at a cost of almost four million dollars, with the first installation scheduled for 2015 at the 19th Street station in Oakland.


The project is expected to cost $4 million per entrance.

https://www.ktvu.com/news/bart-seeks-public-opinion-about-planned-improvements-for-sf-stations

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Woodstream@toast.ooo 32 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Reminds me of that Bojack Horseman poem.

"But this is it, the deed is done silence drowns the sound. Before I leaped I should've seen the view from halfway down.

I really should’ve thought about the view from halfway down. I wish I could've known about the view from halfway down—"

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

It's a fucking amazing poem and had me in tears the first time I saw that episode.

People falling that 30 feet and being stopped in the act may help them see that jumping, or suicide in general is not the answer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Love the NIMBY ass “we don’t want effective barriers to keep people from jumping because then we cant see the view, so put in an invisible torture device that will horribly maim and punish people already so far gone they’ve decided to end it” approach. Really sums up San Francisco. Why don’t they just install a fucking Suicide Booth at each end of the bridge. They clearly aren’t after stopping attempts, they just don’t want to look at it. Easier to find a corpse in the human fishing net 20 feet down than trolling the bay.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. I'm sorry for their view, which is an undeniably beautiful view, isn't as nice and I'm sorry that the historic bridge is less attractive now, but this is going to stop people from dying for fuck's sake!

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Some people would see the nets - a lifesaving device put there by the sheer force and willpower of a community who care so deeply about helping people survive their worst struggles that they pushed the powers that be to design, construct, and pay for it to be put in place and save human lives - and find that a really fucking beautiful sight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

We make fun of China for installing similar nets on their buildings. Maybe we can consider some time actually doing something about the cause of suicide rather than just stopping the action. Healthcare, especially mental healthcare, poverty, housing. But no, just nets.

[–] Ibex0@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, I feel dark for making this meme.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I for one, love it. Nice work. The subject is uncomfortable, but this is absolutely a valid criticism of the system and the outcome in this case.

The fact that you used a meme based on a pawn shop - an institution that tends to take advantage of people on hard times - makes this dark and pithy. The only thing more fitting would be a payday loan center, but thankfully that hasn't made it to reality TV just yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

The nets — placed 20 feet (6 meters) down from the bridge’s deck — are not visible from cars crossing the bridge. But pedestrians standing by the rails can see them. They were built with marine-grade stainless steel that can withstand the harsh environment that includes salt water, fog and strong winds

20 foot drop onto "nets" made of stainless steel? I feel like this may still be a fatal fall.

Edit: I'm not negative on the idea, but it sounds like you are still having a pretty bad time if one of these nets saves your life.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Stainless steel can be woven into a net that would break the fall, I don't know if that's how it works but it would be possible.

I just read a guardian article about it, it's actually kind of fucked up:

The nets are meant to deter people from jumping and to curb the death rate of those who still attempt to jump, though they will likely be badly injured.

“It’s stainless-steel wire rope netting, so it’s like jumping into a cheese grater,” Dennis Mulligan, the general manager of the bridge district, told the Associated Press. “It’s not soft. It’s not rubber. It doesn’t stretch. We want folks to know that if you come here, it will hurt if you jump.”

Notice it says CURB the death rate, which sounds like they anticipate some people will still die? Jesus ffs.

Yeah that's pretty fucked up. Sounds like the punishment for trying to kill yourself is intentional maiming or possible death. Sheesh.

Now I am kinda negative on the idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

meeting resistance from people who did not want to alter the iconic landmark

Well this attitude leads to not only increased homelessness, buy I guess also suicide rates 🙁

[–] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, there's a solution that doesn't involve altering the landmark, but would those people support actually fixing the problem?

Ensuring people's basic needs are met and they have access to mental health support is a lot more difficult than putting an unsightly band-aid on the problem.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

Good point. I apologize for a fairly off the cuff remark about this. We really do need better mental health support in the US.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (11 children)

So, now you just need to jump from the net after it catches you? That does not seem like much of a barrier.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Think of the first fall as a "proof of concept". If after falling ~20 feet to a chain link fence, you still feel like dragging your injured self to the edge of the fence to finish the job, then it's highly unlikely anything will stop you from killing yourself. The fence is kind of a "try before you buy" thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Well, there goes my vacation plans this year.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Does the bay bridge have nets too?

[–] philycheezestake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No but you can’t walk out onto the bay bridge as easily as with Golden Gate.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The new eastern span has a really nice pedestrian walkway and bidirectional bike path between Oakland and Treasure Island.

The old western span does not have a walkway, so you need to enter from treasure island or Oakland / Emeryville.

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago

Took a century near enough, didn't it?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (7 children)

... sure hope the contractor doesn't install razor-sharp steel net by mistake to spaghettify (french fry cut?) anything falling on it ...

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's steel wire, this is gonna turn some people into french fries a la Cube

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›