this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
66 points (83.0% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
3053 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is a "feature" that was only ever available in India. It still sucks, but that's a pretty rage-baity headline.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah yes, only in the country with the world's biggest population and an android market share of 95%

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

they should have specified in the title anyway.

[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

This needs to be a rule in most communities, country ALWAYS needs to be specified. You can't ask for it to be specified for one country and not the other.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's also really disingenuous to show a picture of a passport. Because people's only copy of their passport is a JPG inside Files?

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

I mean I've used the photo of my passport I've had favourited on my phone whenever my passport number/a scan of my passport has been needed for about the last 10 years, so it's at least an inconvenience to just delete them rather than moving them to documents/files or whatever

[–] sajran@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I was sure I'm getting baited when I clicked the link but it's one of the rare cases when it actually turned out not to be a clickbait.

This feature literally found and isolated "important files" and now they are deleting those files. Just because it was never available in the US doesn't mean it's irrelevant.

[–] blackfire@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They are deleting the files instead of moving them out of the feature they automatically included. Man Google just keep sucking.

[–] jungle@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Yeah, well, at least it only affects important official documents. /s

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago

"Don't Be Evil"

[–] sajran@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wait, so Google just moved around important users' files on their devices without being asked to do so. And now they decided to just delete those files together with the feature? This sounds pretty crazy, even for Google.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

According to the article this is a feature that finds “important” documents. Like auto-starring files.

[–] sajran@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, so basically Google invented a feature that finds your important files and deletes them. The future is here!

Of course I'm exaggerating for humoristic effect but in all seriousness I think the whole action is extremely poorly executed. I would be surprised if there weren't some cases of people actually losing something important because of this.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 2 years ago

Oh wait

Particularly worrying for users is that Google plans to delete any file that is inside the Important tab by February 15, 2024. Users who don't want to lose access to these files need to move them before the shutdown data.

They’re literally deleting them what the fuck?

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 1 points 2 years ago

This is so fucking weird. Features like this usually work by merely attaching tags or creating shortcuts, and without moving the original file anywhere. Therefore removing the "Important" tab should only remove the tags and leave files intact.

I wonder whether it's a poor implementation of the feature by Google (highly unlikely) or poor understanding and misrepresentation of the process by the article's author (highly possible).

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

remember when internet companies were cool and benevolent?

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No? Because despite what they said they were still companies. All those words about not being evil, etc, etc, etc were just PR, nothing else.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

In the early days of the internet a lot of these companies were entirely made of nerds who just wanted to create cool shit.

But as they got bigger they all went the same way.

[–] aisteru@lemmy.aisteru.ch 3 points 2 years ago

~~Don't be evil~~

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

So what, Indian users had their important files automatically marked as important, and then deleted? How is this a feature and not the opposite?

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

Literally just keep all saved files and make it manual for users to set their important files. These companies have no clue on how to keep any app.

[–] Feliberto@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

WTF? I'm not sure if my files will get deleted. I wish google were a bit less evil and notify me of what i'm getting deleted.