1rre

Yeah, I agree with that, but if you're really desperate to move and worked in a way where it's you're only goal, it should be possible for around half of people. That may mean living in a shared room in the cheapest part of the bad area of town, getting around on a shitty bike, eating rice and beans while you save up level of frugality, but at that point it's probably worth evaluating if it's worth living like that to be able to leave the country down the line, and in most cases, it's probably not.

Essentially, not "git good," just "it is possible, just probably not worth it."

Also the post was about immigration controls anyway, not having the means to actually move.

Yes, I was referring to someone in the top 50% of earners, still half of all people in the US.

To get to most countries if you're on that demographic, you just need to have a job.

To get to the US historically, you needed to either get a H1B visa, which last I heard had a 9% chance per year, enter the green card lottery, which has a 0.3% chance per year, or transfer within your company after getting promoted to a managerial role via an L1A visa, which is a slow process and very dependant on who you work for, and on your origin country for acceptance rates.

For people in the bottom 50%, I agree it's historically been easier to go the US with the green card lottery, fairly accessible visas if you have immediate family living in the US, and even for illegal immigration with birthright citizenship, as then you can get a green card through your children.

I was basing my comment on the fact most people on Lemmy are going to be nerds working in IT/Sciences/Engineering, but even then, if you take a mean "ease for a random sample to move" then it's still harder to move to the US than out of it.

Immigration is very possible to a lot of countries via employer sponsored routes, generally for highly developed countries the requirement is "you have to be earning above average for your industry," so essentially if you're in the top 50% by skill/experience you should be allowed in. Others require certain levels of education, etc. but for US citizens those levels should generally be achievable.

Relatively, moving to the US has been so much harder than moving out for a long time now, which is why people are saying "just move out."

The thing with PE is they only invest what they're willing to lose, which the vast majority of their investments do, but the tiny fraction that don't make enough money to fund profits and cover losses.

If 95% of companies in the stock market lost money, that'd be the end of days, but that's because generally once you graduate to an IPO you have to be pretty profitable.

The whole point of a pardon is "we know you did the crime, but don't think you should be punished." It can only come about if there's an ulterior motive, like corruption or if you agree to work with the government towards their goals, initially working on dangerous projects etc. Allowing it to be overturned later would undermine that as it wouldn't make the danger worth it.

Fuck no.

I wish everyone used C#, Scala, Rust or Python (DSLs like VHDL, SQLs and CUDA and super specific languages like C, Erlang, Haskell and Bash notwithstanding).

You can hate on them, sure, each for their own reason, but they're all very well supported and good for what they're intended for.

Russia sponsored it, despite being huge and present colonisers, but the text of the motion was pretty lacking.

France, China and the US are the other big two these days (excluding the more minor offenders and the ones that are more imperialist or genocidal than colonialist like Israel, Armenia and Azerbaijan), the US voting against is unsurprising, China like to reframe their colonialism as "Not Colonialism™" and France probably didn't want to get the bad rep of voting against it.

Essentially: it's not designed as a change from North/East/South/West, it's designed as a from-scratch way to refer to those directions.

The sun rises in the East and sets in the West, so let's say East is "Sun" and West is "Setting-Sun."

Polaris/The North Star is in the North, so let's call that direction "Star" and the other direction "No-Star."

When you say "Setting-Sun-Sun-Star," you're saying the direction is more similar to the path the sun takes through the sky than it is to the North Star, and in the direction the sun sets.

16 directions is pretty arbitrary anyway though, usually 8 is enough and then you don't have the confusion of repeated words.

I was assuming a conlang situation where "north" referred more to the axis, rather than the direction.

Anti-north-north would be more "reversed-vertical-vertical" meaning it's reversed vertical (south), and closer to the vertical axis than the horizontal axis. North would just be "vertical" without being reversed.

In all cases, 2 at most.

North
North-north-east
North-east
North-east-east
East
Anti-north-east-east
Anti-north-east
Anti-north-north-east (south-north-east is impossible so the second anti would be redundant)
Anti-north
Anti-east-anti-north-north (reversed word order to distinguish it further)
Anti-east-anti-north
Anti-east-east-anti-north
Anti-east
Anti-east-east-north
Anti-east-north
Anti-east-north-north

anti-north-northeast doesn't sound unreasonable, but that's being logical instead of just thinking about two directions, as written in text, as OP is

It'd be a small model run locally, taking up maybe half a GB of VRAM