this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
461 points (99.8% liked)

Privacy

48042 readers
403 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agree but this does need to be explained to people who aren't in the know. These laws are currently being marketed as "put the power in parents hands" in various states left, right, and center.

Its a good bet when there seems to be widespread bipartisan push for restrictive laws that literally no one asked for, it's gonna be something bad. But you have to explain to mouthbreathers in the electorate why or this shit just gets rammed through.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 15 points 1 month ago

There’s no explaining it to the public at large in our forums. We already know. Unless people suddenly watch a couple trusted news sources en masse and those news sources choose to explain, ignorance will rule.

But then that’s the entire point of fracturing information like this. Fake news. Don’t trust science. That’s woke, don’t listen. Etc.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

i want the 90s internet back, when only nerds were on it. it was way better back then.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I'd like to see people rebuild something like that inside i2p or something similar. But with modern browser fingerprinting it's very hard not to be identifiable even there, unless you take precautions most people absolutely won't do.

[–] WhoathereBub@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some of those nerds are how we got to where we are today.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you're saying forbid the rich from using the internet?

[–] Thesilverpig@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I think we should just forbid being rich

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Every time I say this I get downvoted to hell

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

the music, the clubs, the clothes, the food

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 27 points 1 month ago

Loyal Moses has been on about this. Apparently the bills require third party cloud storage of the information in addition to an online requirement (for logging in???), and continuous telemetry to in use apps on the desktop environment.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

“Child safety” has simply become the marketing department for a rent-seeking surveillance industry.

Damn ain't that the truth.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was looking at a used car online. Found a site that had option to 'reserve' the car until paperwork was done. Started innocuously with email and phone info, to text updates. Fine. Then it asked to verify info, with scans of driver's license.

Persona.

Noped right out.

[–] ChristchurchAsshole@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like a scam. My friend recently looked for cars online, saw one he thought was good. Had a weird description "only 70,000km on the odometre but air conditioning is broken" like how? Then my friend paid $300 for a "viewing" of the car and the scammer made off with the money. Needless to say my friend isn't very smart and never was! Imagine paying just to see something. This is sadly what mental illness does to a person. Not the first time my friend was scammed either.

I had a friend that stupid. Had.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"hiding inside" of it? No no, the whole point is surveillance with full KYC. With the end goal being digital ID and CBDC and social credit scores. What the authorities consider to be correct behavior will earn points and if you so much as breathe a syllable of a question about why they're making you do something you'll lose points and you'll be locked out of things that didn't require an ID to get into before, possibly even access to a grocery store or any other place or service you could get food from

[–] ki9@lemmy.gf4.pw 16 points 1 month ago

Great article! Some writing cannot be accused of AI-generation... Because it's good.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

Blog post by the people who found this: https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Epstein class wants to reliably know who is (and therefore isn't) an adult on the internet.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They want to identify the bots from the humans. Partially for advertising.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They want to identify the girls. For grooming.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It was a typo. Fixed.

[–] HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

read part 2

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Holy fuck I got about 10 minutes into this can someone do a tldr

[–] Gwyntale@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

No. Some things are important enough to fully read.