this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
311 points (96.7% liked)

Games

47259 readers
1890 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm sick of the memes already and it's only been a day or so

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

“I am not Satan” - Satan

[–] Creegz@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago

DLSS - a solution devised by moronic suits to solve a problem other moronic suits created.

I miss when video games were made so we could experience the vision of the developers. I also miss when the games made were optimized (at least somewhat) for the user experience and not cranked out sloppily for investors.

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

If they don't stop digging this slop hole any deeper, I won't be coming back.

Heck my 7900xtx is serving me plenty well and my Ryzen processor is doing more than enough.

Seeing how my old lower specced pc lasted me 11 years I figure this one might be able to chug along for a few more at this point.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago

I miss when tech was fun..

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Me happy with my intel arc

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 124 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“I hate x.”

-“No you don’t!”

These people are fucking insane.

[–] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 76 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Everyone clowns on "the customer is always right", and for good reason, but this kind of situation is actually what the phrase originally meant. In matters of taste, the customer is always right.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I think, the problem is that Nvidia has two customer groups. Those that buy their products and those that buy their stock options. Nvidia can produce garbage that completely misses the point of real-world usage, so long as they can convince investors that other investors will join the pyramid scheme. And for that, it just has to look like impressive tech, not actually good or artistically meaningful.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but social media backlash isn't the tangible way of determining what customers think. If customers still shell out the money for these things (seems they will) then customers are providing approval of this shit in the only way that actually matters.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It is not, but prohibitive pricing causes potential customers to be more considered in their buying decisions. If I'm looking at graphics cards, and one costs triple the other for AI reasons, some will have the decision made for them by their wallet, and others will decide the AI stuff is not worth more than the whole rest of the PC, leaving only the whales with more money than sense.

Catering only to whales may work for businesses making microtransaction games, because there is no limit to how much a whale might spend there, but no matter how rich a customer is, he only wants one graphics card for his PC, maybe 2.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Have you heard of this new thing called thr "K-Shaped Economy"?

It's this gross thing where corporations have realized they bled all they they can out of us pleebs and are now resorting in sucking off the rich.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I haven't heard of the term before, but the notion you're describing is definitely something I've thought and read about some before. Thanks for teaching me something new I can go learn more about!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

It's not like they are going to say anything else?

[–] missingno@fedia.io 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If we say we don't like and it looks hideous, what exactly are we wrong about? "Actually you really love it!" Fuck off, you can't force us to like your slop no matter how much you try to shove it down our throats.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You'll need two 5090 cards anyway.

I'm actually happy I can't afford this bullshit.

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 hours ago

Yeah that, other DLSS version was used to boost framerate. If people want pixel clarity for flex they'd run at 4k native. If this is mainly for altering visual, might as well market this as a separate product, like their corporate version of ReShade or something.

In fact, I vaguely remember they have something like that already. Around Battlefield V (2018) release I remember Nvidia had a tool to alter the games rendering settings deeper than the game itself allows, like lowering the LOD way lower in quality making it easier to see enemies, etc. DLSS5 could've been part of this thing.

[–] Freakazoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Cant even afford one haha my trusty 2070 super still works great for my needs.

I wonder how much power two 5090s would draw?🤔

Energy bill through the roof I guess.

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

My desktop with a 3080 draws more than my homelab R740s even the one with a Quadro. Two 5090s would probably use more than the whole rack.

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think the straw man claim was that it's AI slop, and Huang said we're wring, because AI is deeply integrated into the rendering pipeline.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how nuanced the definition of "AI slop" is these days, but to me, it seems to refer to any content generated by AI directly for consumption. If that's the definition you're using, then this product does produce AI slop, because the art is materially altered from what the game's art direction put in there, as can clearly be seen in the example side by side image comparisons. The differences clearly exceed simple lighting and texture changes, and the lighting it does alter does not appear to adhere to the same light source as the unaltered images, creating more detail at the expense of accuracy to the original content. It is the difference between "make me an image clearer than this" vs. "make this image clearer".

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with you, this is an AI slop filter, but the main critique I've seen was about it changing the piece of art to something the artist didn't intend (kind of the second half of your reply), that's why I said he argues against a straw man.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, I misunderstood your comment and thought you were suggesting that Huang thought arguments against his point were the straw man argument, which doesn't seem to be the case to me.

Huang seems to be suggesting that since the AI work is happening further down in the rendering pipeline, rather than reskinning it after rendering, makes it not count as AI slop, which is ridiculous.

If I am cooking a recipe to make something, it doesn't matter if the recipe calls for adding shit to the top or if I just pour some shit on after it is cooked. It still has shit all over it.

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 2 points 16 hours ago

All good, my reply was a bit ambiguous in that concern.

I agree, calling that feature "not AI slop" can only be explained by the fact that he's the CEO and has to sell that garbage.

[–] MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Man, what a nightmare hellscape. And whether you use the service or can't even afford a graphics card that can do any of this, you're gonna pay for it as it incentivises developers to focus less on graphics because they're just gonna be smeared in generative slop anyway.

Its getting harder to avoid dodging these fuckass companies, but I'm not supporting this shit anymore.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I think this might be a self-solving problem. Because the barriers to publishing software are practically nonexistent anymore, gaming companies cannot corner the market like you see in other industries.

People that don't mind cutting corners, and those that have little taste and have seen every Friends episode 20 times, will still pay top dollar for the slop because they are easily marketed to, but there will always be people refusing that path that make things with the intention of the customer liking them instead of the shareholders. The businesses doing things this way will find a lively marketplace untapped by the AAA studios that can't stay out of their own way.

If it continues as it has, the gulf between quality and slop will continue to widen, and these slop games will be consumed by the same people that think Arby's Steak Nuggets are food, while the rest of us enjoy quality content actually made by someone.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

For me the silver lining is that only devs who are absolute hacks and produce overpriced crap would use this. I don‘t buy their games now and I won‘t buy their slop tomorrow. Personally I don‘t think it will be hard to dodge this for a very, very long time. The hardware to run this is unaffordable and development cycles are huge. This tech could be retro before I have to actually start maneuvering around it.

load more comments
view more: next ›