this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
583 points (97.7% liked)

Risa

6915 readers
178 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You're right, I probably should go rewatch that episode where the crew triggers a Cardasians trap, and the station captures them, and Dukat comes to gloat.

[–] JulesTheModest@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago

Attention Bajoran workers!

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It has my favorite scene in it when Garak accuses Dukat of having a crush on Kira and the shocked "Garak" response from him was so comical.

[–] snail_hatan@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] M500@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is really great! I just finished a watch of it a few weeks ago and I just want to watch it again.

The characters are really great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Of course it was, it was based on Babylon 5

Shots fired

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] forksandspoons@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Teal@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I was impressed they managed to get baseball caps to fit on those fat alien heads.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I've just started a Voyager run through with my kids. Dare I say S1 of Voyager is a much better introduction to "modern" Trek than the fairly uneven S1 TNG? I think Janeway is underrated as a Star Fleet captain.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It brings me no joy to say this, but TNG isn’t “modern Trek” anymore.

[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why not? It's only 10 years old or so?

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
[–] orb360@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It aired from 87 to 94... So it's 30-40 years old...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She is! Always wondered why she got so much hate in the community. Not as much as Archer did though. Which is also great IMHO.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Janeway didn't get hate as much as it was criticism of the writers for making her inconsistent. One week it was "Prime directive no matter the consequences", the next was "Lets do whatever to make drama."

For all of Roddenberry's faults, his presence for the early years of TNG kept TNG consistent instead of allowing the writer of the week to change characters for their personal story. By the time he was gone, the formula was set such that writers wouldn't mess with characters.

Voyager has no singular authority so consistency of character was rare.

Edit: Except for Ensign Kim. He was born an Ensign and died one. Nobody messed with perfection.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

He was born an Ensign and died one.

Several times.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I've actually come to think of Janeway as someone consistently written to be an inconsistent Captain, rather than 100% inconsistently written. Others are nowhere near as inconsistent as Janeway.

Once I started thinking of her inconsistency as being the result of trying to walk a tightrope of sticking to Starfleet ideals, as well as maintaining order in a demoralised crew in unfamiliar territory where they don't have the support and full might of the Federation and its allies behind them, Janeway's inconsistent and contradictory behaviour starts making a lot more sense and feels a lot more organic.

[–] derek@social.coop 4 points 10 months ago

@TheGrandNagus Kinda makes sense that way. Flung into trouble because of her adherence to the Prime Directive, then had to do whatever it took to get the crew home... I'd waffle about, too.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

You might be right, the inconsistency was well around. But it still was a good show. I always perceived her as a more "indecisive" captain. Or one being able to change her opinions. Whatever. It's what it is. The best female captain we had so far 😊

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

S1 TNG is infamously jank.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The first two seasons of TNG are balls.

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not quite as terrible as their reputation. Yeah, they've definitely got some of the worst episodes of Trek ever, but there are good ones in there, too.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Oddly, the worst two episodes of Trek are in s7, just before the finale, which is one of the best episodes ever.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

I agree but still good Trek compared to Discovery and Picard.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

I'm rewatching TNG and season 1 was pretty.... Off. Most of the characters seemed to be cheap knockoffs of their established personas. The most distinctive for me was Brent Spiner (Data), where, I can't put my finger on it, but he just seemed off the the data that I know and love.

I chalk it up to him coming off of being a comedic bit actor and he was still finding himself for the more dramatic role of data. He hadn't really nailed down the robotic methodology of his actions and speech that really makes data stand out. His responses were often quick, to the point of speaking over others, and his actions were fairly fluid and organic, which isn't Data at all.

It really didn't take long for him to work his way into the role (and into our hearts), I'm not criticising Brent by any stretch. He was and I'm sure still is, an incredible actor.... Judging by his fairly recent role reprising Data on Picard, he really hasn't lost his touch.

There's plenty of other things about season one that are odd, but I found Data to be the most notable. Still, worf was a lot more brooding, Picard seemed almost more timid, Riker didn't have a beard.... The only person from season one who I can point to with certainty and say that they didn't seem off from season 1 (compared to how I know the character), was Dr. Crusher. She was hitting it out of the park from day 1.

No matter the oddity, almost all of it was simply gone by the end of season one. I'm partway into season two now and I wouldn't be able to differentiate the characters on screen from any other season of the show, or from their movies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm finally watching star trek with my girlfriend and getting her into it. Been watching along with her on TNG. So far we are about done with season 1, but I am big excited to re-watch DS9 se5, especially with her watching it for the first time by my side.

Gonna have to brave the awful ass se1 Sisko haircut though lol.

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago

Went through the same process with my partner... Apparently she prefers Sisko with hair and no beard!

But she also liked S1&2 of TNG a lot...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Allamaraine, count to four

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

I like that episode... Really.

Allamaraine if you can see, allamaraine you'll come with me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Having grown up on DS9 and Voyager, and just finished all the good new trek, I went back and stared TNG for the first time.

The rest of this post intentionally left blank.

[–] hactar42@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm the opposite right now. Grew up on TNG, just finished SNW and Lower Decks and now I'm watching DS9 for the first time.

[–] nilaus@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I grew up on tng. Thought nothing could top picard and his crew... You are in for a treat!

[–] psud@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I and my wife have both watched all of Star Trek individually before we met. When new trek appeared we rewatched everything before watching all of new trek, good and less good, together

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

TNG's first season can just be skipped IMO. The first time I watched TNG on streaming, I was... surprised... at the quality of season 1.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But I'm already midway through watching ds9

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 9 points 10 months ago

Well, clearly you're going to have to start again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lydia_K@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago

Actual picture of my heart.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Anyone know if that DS9 server that was remaking it with AI visuals is still around?

[–] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago

I don't know. I do know there are 720p and 1080p AI upscales. They can look a little "smooth", but they're less distracting than the bad 480p transfers Netflix was showing a few years ago.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

"... my child."

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

You gotta have faith of the heart, after all.

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Deep space nine.... Wow I can watch that again it's been decades... Am I old now?

[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

Now that you mention it, it has been a while for that as well....

load more comments
view more: next ›