"playbook" is a generous use of that term
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
207 points (99.1% liked)
News
37211 readers
2227 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Seriously, should be “coloring book”.
Though I highly doubt Trump could stay in the lines, so even that is probably a stretch
Lines are tough when drawing with a sharpie.
I would expect Trump to be more a finger-painting kind of guy.
His tariff playbook doesn’t work for tariffs either.
"I'm going to punish those nations by making Americans pay more tax." And then finding that the tariffs didn't work because America doesn't actually make those products or if they do they're so inferior that people would rather pay the much higher price for imported goods.
We can buy stuff from Iran?
Not directly, but the oil that passes through the Strait allows trucks to deliver things.
This is a great example of how everyone tends to overlook the indirect consequences of things. I can barely list all the ways the straight being closed directly hurts us, let alone all the indirect ways.
Yeah, tariffs don't work like he thinks they do. EVERYBODY told him that, except the fraud with the fake book on tariffs, but he's a stable genius, so he ignored them, and listened to the fraud.
If the article accurately frames Iran's approach, then I'd wager it's a pretty high risk gamble given the current administration's approach to international politics.
The US administration is full of neo fascists, who openly laud fascist historical leaders. They view the EU as a geopolitical adversary, and Russia as a geopolitical friend. Hegseth promoting the "greater technate of america" is basically in complete alignment with Putin's world view.
America's goals in Iran 'could' potentially be as simple as "Make Europe feel pain, and sow discord amongst EU members by enticing some to rebuild ties with Russia for oil". Pair that with their exposed chat leak during the yemen bombing, and a second goal could be "Remove US military assets from the region, or get significant funding increases from nations that directly benefit from open trade routes in that region". That second goal aligns with Trump's whole "Maybe we'll partner with Iran to charge a toll" comments from a couple days ago, as well as the demands for large contributions from gulf states. The countries feeling the most impact of the disruption, are basically viewed as "Freeloaders who took advantage of the US maintaining global order, while not contributing enough to US coffers".
In other words, Iran blockading the Strait is a win for the broader objectives of the USA; those objectives differ from, and are in direct opposition to, Western democratic interests -- because the USA is increasingly a fascist dictatorship.
The only reason China's approach worked, is that the USA directly needed those rare earths -- if those rare earths were only needed by other western democracies, the USA likely wouldnt've cared. The USA also likely recognises that a direct conflict with China would be catastrophic for the USA. This explains why they're letting sanctioned Chinese boats pass through the American "blockade" without hassle. And lastly, China's role as an authoritarian anti-individualist "rule an area of the map according to Putin's plan", gives China a lot more leverage than Iran.