this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
576 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83930 readers
4270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The policy change follows years of Meta and its chief executive Mark Zuckerberg’s pivot of political convenience toward President Donald Trump and his base. Following Trump’s second electoral victory, Meta quickly changed its speech rules to allow for anti-transgender slurs and dehumanization of immigrants, The Intercept previously reported, aligning the company with longtime MAGA culture war grievances.

Asked about the new restrictions on the word “antifa,” Meta spokesperson Erica Sackin pointed to a March transparency report that noted the company would “remove QAnon and Antifa content when combined with content-level threat signals.” The report does not explain what those signals are. Meta did not respond when asked if the company had discussed its antifa speech rules with the Trump administration.

Meta largely outsources the enforcement of its Community Standards rules to low-paid contractors whose interpretation and application of the policies can vary. The company’s automated, algorithmic content moderation systems are also famously glitchy. This combination can result in erratic censorship, particularly when political ideology is classified as violent or terroristic.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So, anti fascism is not allowed in USA? Understandable, it want not allowed in Italy 1922-1943 nor in Germany 1933-1945.

[–] encelado748@feddit.org 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Italy has always been a trend setter. Trump is just a cheap mashup of Berlusconi and Mussolini

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

And netynahu is Hitler

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

The only time I ever see the word used is by some conservative Karen bleating about how it's a terrorist org or whatever, so nice self-own I guess?

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Antifa antifa antifa antifa antifa oh damn looks like lemmy is not yet ruled by pedophiles

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Here's how you have to talk on YouTube about this "Mamifa ... mamifa ...PDF files"

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Yea I know, and schmurder and unalive and that shit

Fuck them all

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is why Facebook is banned in China and should be in any civilized country. It's nothing but an extension of US soft power and its fascist imperialist tentacles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 141 points 5 days ago (2 children)

child exploitation and hate speech, cool cool cool. any mention of a loose-knit global movement against fascism that has existed for decades, that's dangerous. priorities!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 69 points 5 days ago

The only criterion is: are billionaires into it, or does it threaten them?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

Here's everybody's reminder that every WWII vet (at least from the Allied forces) was antifa.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 64 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You cannot be pro Democracy without being Antifa. If you do not support fascism, you are antifa.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago
[–] gnufuu@infosec.pub 11 points 4 days ago

Anti Antifa = Fa

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

I think the word is mostly used by the far right anyways

[–] Janx@piefed.social 75 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Conservative voters are so stupid, they actually think Antifa and Anonymous are official, trademarked, centralized organizations. Just start saying the full thing, "anti-fascist" when describing protestors, etc...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The right love their bogeymen.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Gotta have an other to point at.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 86 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (29 children)

No anti-fascist calls themselves antifa and being anti-fascist is the default state of being for every single person who is not a fascist.

'Antifa' is a fabricated scare term prompted by the right-wing elite's media influence campaign. It exists as a term in order to imply that there is some actual secret organization which can be presented as the boogey man to scare working-class people and/or to label as a terrorist organization so the elites in power can use the power of law enforcement to attack and jail their monied political opponents by claiming their association with or funding of a 'known domestic terror group'.

Anything saying 'antifa' on social media is either intentional propaganda or the ignorant masses propagating those same memes.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (6 children)

That's really not true. I've seen the term antifa (standing for anti-fascism) used plenty for many decades now.

We've had antifa spray tags in my school's walls.

It may seems obscure to some parts of the world but for those of us who suffered under fascism multiple times (south Europe) it's a very familiar phrase from a long time before trump become president.

[–] zeejoo@thelemmy.club 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

In the US though he's absolutely correct. It's just not a term anyone but MAGAts use. This rule really is only gonna censor the people trying to fear monger, and not any actual "antifa members" because they don't exist.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Anivia@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago

No anti-fascist calls themselves antifa

Maybe in murica, but not in Germany

[–] anzo@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

You need to read Antifa, a manual written by Mark Bray. You will be surprised with history. The real propaganda was the billionaire media that biased your opinion. No offense (unless you really skip skimming through the easily found online epub, in which case you'd be denying yourself the chance to grow and hence lose any respect I had for the human being you are ;)

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] leoj@piefed.social 44 points 4 days ago

As a self proclaimed leftist who has been to many protests, I have never once heard anyone say the word Antifa except for my Maga boss when he thought Antifa was going to come and rob his house after the BLM protests...

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 53 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

So this basically means they are proud to be "Fascist" then.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 23 points 5 days ago

All tech bro are proud of it

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 20 points 5 days ago

If you are Anti-Antifa you are Fa.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 22 points 4 days ago
[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good. People who still utilize these properties should be abused until they realize they can use a different service.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

I think this would only push antifaschist users out, and leave the platform with only nazis and indifferent people.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Imma bout to get banned on instagram…

[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Looks like Zuck is all in and has no choice but to support evil, because if/when the evil collapses, so does Zuck. Must be stressful for him as history has shown that this behaviour eventually catches up to them. Sadly, some make it too old age and run entire countries before it catches up which causes a lot of unnecessary suffering.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

social media has been twisting itself to protect conservatives and right wing political terrorism since damn near the beginning.

Its where their bread and butter are. Right wing idiots following right wing demagogues spouting right wing bullshit are the ones that dont run adblockers, that click all the ads (Especially if its for merchandise for their chosen political team), and generate disproportionate amounts of money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

is that the same guy claiming that there should be no moderation on Facebook for "true freedom" and who cried his eyes out telling stories of horrible Democracts making him take out deranged individuals off platform? Well...

[–] XLE@piefed.social 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

tl;dr this new policy is dumb and bad. References to specific things like Antifa make no logical sense as a grounds for censorship, because there were already reasonable rules in place to handle actual problems.

In some cases, the content that Meta considers a threat signal is commonsensical. If, for instance, a user mentions bringing a weapon to an event, the company flags it as a threat signal. But in other cases, Meta’s process for identifying threat signals is more vague. Under the new rules, Meta might trigger a threat signal when a user posts a “visual depiction of a weapon,” a “reference to arson, theft, or vandalism,” or “military language,” if accompanied by the word “antifa.”

If “antifa” is mentioned in the context of “references to historical or recent incidents of violence” — a category so sprawling that it includes “historic wars” and “battles” — that post will also be penalized. Should Meta apply this rule as written, the company could, for instance, restrict posts comparing the antifascist nature of World War II to the contemporary antifa movement.

It's difficult to believe any intellectual discussion would happen on Facebook, but this rule further cements the suppression of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I can’t believe anybody uses products from this company anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is "Pro-Constitution" and "Anti-Tyranny" gonna be on a list of banned words?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

So the bots and borderline mentally handicapped senior citizens that use Facebook can no longer say "antifa".

Whatever.

I have a Facebook account with a fake name so I can peruse Marketplace. The shit that it tried to get me view is literally insane. A outrage inducing AI post that's clearly fake with thousands of comments littered with spelling errors that are barely even readable. Facebook makes me realize how Trump was elected. People are very very very stupid. Go see for yourself. You won't believe your eyes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

No no officer I didn't say antifa. I said I was a fashopp (Fascism Opponent)

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

delete. facebook.

why are we still using it in 2026 again?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›