this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
192 points (98.0% liked)

News

37401 readers
2700 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A civil rights lawsuit against the Polk County Sheriff’s Office in Florida overcame a tricky and nuanced legal hurdle this week in federal court.

As Mother Jones originally reported, Taylor Cadle was 12 years old in 2016 when she told a sheriff’s deputy that she had been sexually abused by her adoptive father, Henry Cadle. Instead of arresting the abuser, Deputy Melissa Turnage charged Taylor with filing a false police report. According to Taylor, her adoptive mother pushed her to plead guilty. As part of her probation, she was required to write apology letters to a sheriff’s deputy and her abuser.

After returning to her adoptive father’s care, Taylor was raped again. But this time, she recorded the assault with her phone and collected key physical evidence.

After reporting the abuse for a second time, Taylor’s adoptive father was arrested and sentenced to 17 years in prison for sexual battery of a child.

Taylor had never shared her story publicly until Mother Jones reporters connected with her in late 2023. After the story was published and was picked up by other outlets, including Rolling Stone and People, Taylor said no one from the Sheriff’s Office ever reached out to apologize. The absence of a reaction didn’t seem to align with a sheriff who has said that he would “go to the ends of the Earth” to arrest child sex abusers and that if his office makes a mistake, he would “dress up, ’fess up, and fix it up.”

Now 22, Taylor filed the suit last fall alleging that the sheriff and his deputies violated her civil rights by conducting a biased investigation, falsely arresting her, and leaving her abuser free to rape her again. The suit was filed against Sheriff Grady Judd in his individual and official capacity, two detectives involved in the investigation, and her adoptive father.

Judd’s office directly responded to Taylor’s claims, calling her lawsuit “frivolous.”

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The sheriff’s attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that Taylor had waited too long to sue. They argued that Florida’s statute limits Taylor’s civil rights claims to seven years, and she filed her suit nine years after she was falsely arrested.

However, Taylor’s lawyers presented a legal argument that—to their knowledge—hasn’t been used in this district court. The seven-year time limit functions as a “statute of repose,” preventing federal courts from applying it. Therefore, the court should consider the clock paused during the years she was a minor living with a guardian whose interests were working against hers. The team argued that under that interpretation, her deadline shifted to four years after she turned 18. Taylor filed within that window, the day before her 22nd birthday.

District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, a Trump appointee, agreed. She ruled that most of Taylor’s claims could go forward, including allegations that sheriff’s detectives had maliciously prosecuted her and violated her right to bodily safety.

[Attorney Brenda] Harkavy said this provides an extended timeline for other survivors to file suits if they were abused as children and continued to live under the care of someone whose interests were averse to theirs.

This case sounds horrific, but if it opens up more opportunities for child victims to sue their abusers after becoming adults that will be a major victory.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 12 points 2 weeks ago

It's surprising that a trump appointee sided with the raped child over cops.

[–] muxika@piefed.muxika.org 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Check the sheriff's hard drive.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 13 points 2 weeks ago

Id say there's a 50/50 chance there is CSAM of her on there.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 weeks ago

Judd’s office directly responded to Taylor’s claims, calling her lawsuit “frivolous.”

Yeah, this guy didn't investigate because he and the adoptive dad were rapist pedo buddies, it's almost guaranteed.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Judd’s office directly responded to Taylor’s claims, calling her lawsuit “frivolous.”

The law summarily dismissing the victim again ... !

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 21 points 2 weeks ago

Sheriff Grady Chudd is a piece of shit, just another conservative grifter who chooses showmanship over the law. Hopefully this case puts him down for good.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What this poor girl has gone through is heinous enough, all statutes of limitation should be suspended indefinitely in her case. Honestly, hearing how many victims of child sexual abuse escape Stockholm syndrome years later, maybe child sexual abuse should not come with a statute of limitations, at all. I guess child abuse in general, not just sexual.

I know that lawyer try out every single tactic in the playbook, hoping that something sticks, but the sheriff trying to hide behind, "She waited too long," is abhorrent.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why does "child rape," or any rape, have a statute of limitations at all?

[–] manxu@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know, I was wondering that, too. I think it might have something to do with the limitations of technology back in the ancient days (of 50 years ago), when it made little sense to prosecute someone for something heinous, but essentially unprovable.

Tech has made huge strides and we can Bones the shit out of any case, even if 100 years old.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the general idea of the Statute of Limitations was that if you got away with it long enough, it was presumably because you had changed your wicked ways, and stayed out of trouble, and had earned a second chance.

Okay, maybe that's true for the guy who robbed a bank to pay his mortgage and keep his house 15 years ago, but rape? And CHILD rape?

I don't care how much you've changed, and come to regret your actions, you need to go to jail, I don't care if you are 100 years old. Every rapist needs to live their life knowing that their ugly secret could catch up to him at any moment.

Like the Golden State Killer, going through life thinking he got away with his youthful hobby.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think you are onto something. It does sound like they didn't take rape, even child rape, all that seriously until relatively recently.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Chief Grady is a semi celebrity in Florida known for his social media clips where he ridicules the criminals he catches ... he's a "good ole boy" and living proof that rural Florida is the "deep south"

Personally, I think he's a shitty human trying to do what he thinks it's a "good job"

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/EdY0_1Xo_Bs

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 2 weeks ago

This guy is always doing press conferences, showing photos of people he arrested, too, before trial.