this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
374 points (98.4% liked)

Funny

14887 readers
764 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Boss: “You say this email was written by you despite the fact it obviously contains em dashes.”

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seymour: I just learned about them -- they're fantastic!
Boss: It's addressed, "Dear Super Nintendo Chalmers".

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Seymour: ...I uh...well...you see, that...excuse me.

[Seymour goes into office as smoke billows outwards. Then immediately returns.]

Seymour: Well that was a beautiful business meeting. A good time was had by all. I'm pooped.

Chalmers: Yes, I really should be go-GOOD LORD WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THERE!?

Seymour: Norman Rockwell painting another one of his pieces of classic Americana.

Chalmers: Norman Rockwell?! Deceased famed illustrator Norman Rockwell? Painting poorly articulated nineteen fingered hands!? Portrayed in nonsensical spacial perspective!? With seventeen different light sources coming from impossible angles!?

Seymour: Yes.

Chalmers: May I see him?

Seymour: ..No.

Agnes: Seymour! Midjourney is generating AI images again!

Seymour: No mother, that's just a famous illustrator creating his masterpieces.

Charmers: Well Seymour, you are an odd fellow, but I must say, you write a professional sounding email.

[As the emails to Tech Support go unanswered, the children continue to use unfiltered school internet -- purchasing NFT's and asking Grok unadulterated questions...]

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I got one from our head dev where he admitted outright using "an agent" to rewrite an ssh tunnel and then finished his sentence with a gemini level question asking if we wanted additional functionality that made no damned sense.

The tunnel bricked, btw.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 19 points 2 days ago

The tunnel bricked, btw.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 2 days ago

A tunnel made by AI:

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My company wants to see that we’re using it. The obvious the better.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Just put

This email generated by co-pilot, I probably didn't even read it, FML.

As your default outlook sig.

[–] Fishy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Patented manager emails, old family recipe.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Email from manager was created by copilot, use copilot to summarize their email

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I will then use copilot to translate your manager speak in to regular speech costing the company tokens and fulfilling the company target of using more copilot.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just got an AI from my lawyer, not sure how to respond

[–] iltoroargento@startrek.website 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

don't have the luxury to afford another retainer

[–] iltoroargento@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel it. To be entirely honest, it was already probably sent by an underpaid secretary or paralegal. Now it's just more apparent that they have too large a caseload.

If it impacts the case, you can see about having them hand it off to another lawyer, but that is definitely something to be strategic about (especially depending on the nature of the work).

Most attorneys are willing to pick up a case or contract work with a sort of finders fee to the first attorney that depends on how much work was done before the handoff.

Not sure if it'll work for you, but I'd try an honest conversation as a lot of the times, attorneys are aware that certain cases/clients aren't the right fit or they may be unable to handle the caseload.

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Worst case scenario, the attorney can comply but increase their fees; because they have to process things manually.

If I were practicing, I would be suuuuper hesitant to do that in any half reasonable jurisdiction. Bar associations (and judges) take client fees pretty seriously and attorneys are already obligated to review everything (even if it's a fiction we all turn a blind eye to).

Have you tried asking copilot??