this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
469 points (98.8% liked)

Flippanarchy

2419 readers
1042 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In my state, timber tycoons have systematically stripped the forests of usable wood. Having exhausted local resources, they are now migrating to neighbouring states to repeat the extraction cycle.

About five years ago, the state governor enacted a strict logging ban, citing the industry's absolute failure to replace the trees they harvested. For nearly two years, these corporate interests lobbied the government relentlessly to lift the restriction. Throughout this extensive lobbying period, they consistently failed to present any viable reforestation strategy.

Consequently, the governor drafted a state-led initiative. He established a new agency dedicated to reforestation, superseding the existing national forestry department that had long since abandoned its mandate. For six months, this new office functioned as intended. They planted saplings, monitored ecological recovery, and actively regulated logging activities.

Then, regulatory capture took effect. The tycoons successfully bribed the new agency, and all conservation efforts ceased completely. The governor's personal complicity remains unconfirmed; however, the institutional failure is absolute.

Capitalism functions as a purely extractive virus upon the planet. If this economic architecture is allowed to persist, within a few decades the populace will be forced to purchase polluted water and privatised oxygen simply to survive.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 6 points 15 hours ago

Shout out to a cool game I played on itch recently called Sunset Shift

It's a driving simulator about a group of nepo babies that gut a beautiful island of its natural resources like a disposable sponge, then move onto the next one. Gameplay is a little clunky, but great storyline overall.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean I opt for less humans in the world eventually. Everyone has a better life then, more to go around.

If we outlaw billionaires, automate a large portion of work, reduce down the populations over time naturally (from education etc), youd have a utopia.

Yeah it wouldnt work because some asshole human would fuck it up to be the all powerful shit head.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure, but it must not be done by force, law etc. It should be done by more education, more resources being shared etc. Birth rates tend to go down with people being more equal, educated and having more access to resources and community.

Else those of us who live on this planet, human or not, are no better than those in power currently.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed! Thats why i said education etc. Not "forced" low populations.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no viable reforestation plan. You can't replace old growth or the species lost by the initial act. We already live in a ghost world. Biodiversity collapse has been happening. The new age is already dawning. The only question is if humanity will adapt.

[–] inkblade@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And how would this adaptation happen?

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact: network based systems are better and faster at adapting to change than hierarchical ones. The only reason why nordic monarchies evolved into what we have today is because europe had a stable climate at the time.

[–] inkblade@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A Federated Society 🙂‍↕️

Too bad, a majority of the world will rage against such ideas.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

Humans cooperate naturally when it is in their best interest. When natural disasters happen people work together to provide each other with food and shelter. The Desktop Regulatory State

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

sanctus pretty much hit the nail on the head. humans are very adaptable. we just have to choose what we're willing to adapt to.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 3 points 16 hours ago

With humans it would be a societal or behavioral over genetic. Pretty easy to imagine. As to what would be the catalyst, probably mass migration, starvation, and suffering during the impending climate crisis.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 17 points 1 day ago

"I got mine."

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The People spent a colossal amount of their personal time and energy to defeat the vote. Greay job everyone.

Except,
The lobbyists will always be back tomorrow, to try again.

[–] Teppa@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] nova@lemmy.wtf 1 points 22 hours ago

worse than that it really sounds AI generated with the sentence structure