this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
160 points (85.7% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@sh.itjust.works 58 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago

How did you know my browser's user-agent string?

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 57 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 18 points 9 months ago

Yeah I hate the phrasing of the headline. Makes you sounds like they did turn it over. And then you get that last part of the sentence.

[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

a) discussions aren’t a crime.

b) what are studios going to do to the hundreds of millions of daily pirates? Write stern letters?

c) they tried identifying us and sending us stern letters in 2001 and we all laughed, then kept pirating anyway.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago

Yes they will write stern, spooky letters to the tone of "give us money or get sued". Then they take the money they get, and sue no one because they have no evidence.

It's basically a 419 scam, but with lawyers

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or, perhaps it would be more cost effective to spend your money developing a way to access content that isn’t user-hostile. Then, suddenly, piracy wouldn’t be on the rise.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

But how does that pay the shareholders?

[–] Haha@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] WallEx@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

We can do both.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know that you mean that sarcastically, and I agree. In the end, they could be happy with some passive income on old IPs but decide to be greedy instead.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah it's sarcasm ^^

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

Film studios must suck my cock, I say.

[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

VPN go brrrrrr

But seriously though, more people need to migrate away from Reddit.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but at least Reddit is big enough it can say “no”. You have no rights B over whether it dies, but it can. A smaller device may not be able to afford to.

What would happen on Lemmy? I seriously doubt anyone hosting Lemmy could afford a legal battle with something that big.

A better argument is “shut the hell up”. You’re playing with fire by discussing something a place deems illegal, on a service under the legal jurisdiction deeming it illegal. You really can’t assume any right to privacy online. Use your VPN first, and discuss it in a jurisdiction where it is ok. Countries are better suited to “just say no”

[–] ilikecoffee@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

What would happen on Lemmy?

You switch to a different instance that isn't snitching on you, right? There's already so many instances, big and small, that I don't think it would be feasible for the movie people to go after all of them.

[–] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Strange, my reddit account seems to have had all its posts and comments deleted and my IP leads back to Proton. Oopsy daisy. Get fucked clowns.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

So glad I did that when they fucked with their api

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There's like 2 decent movies released per year. I think people can do without.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No no you don't get it. The point is to hoard the movies. Not to watch them!

They're like Steam games: You collect more than you play.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I am in this post and I don't like it

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 0 points 9 months ago

I'm in this comment and I don't like it. (/s)

[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

ok i REALLY need to delete my account there.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 months ago

I said this on the last repost as well.

Obviously there are reasons the film studios want that but actually getting information because you suspect someone crimes a bit too hard online is really tough. Your evidence must be waterproof to get a subpoena and until then you can run into a plathera of different issues thanks to airtight GDPR rules that still apply to US companies as well (they updated them to be even more strict with their newer compliance laws last year).

Actually there's a good chance that sharing data or IPs without a subpoena could be not only devastating to any potential legal case, but also to Reddit. They will never do this because they stand to gain nothing from it as is and if they wanna go IPO they can't pull such shakes moves rn.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This must be the reason every piracy community I know has strict rules about not requesting specific titles. Even if they had the IPs, I'm not sure what they could prosecute, especially considering the number of users who use a VPN.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I'm very surprised that Reddit didn't immediately bend the knee. If they succeed in going public this policy will not continue

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 9 months ago

if they gave in for one, they would be in for all

so they have to fight to be forced so they don't have to answer every request

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Sadlyi think this is the inevitable

[–] hellequin67@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Probably because the brown envelope wasn't think enough.

I'm sure for the right "incentive" they'll happily cooperate.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In the immortal words of the insane clown posse, "fuck off."

[–] Sirico@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Non-western users, oh no...anyway

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Film studios say the darnest things, don't they

[–] IDeserveToBeLoved@szmer.info 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

With CGI-NAT wouldn't the actual list be as much useful as just all 4 billion ipv4 adresses?

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 months ago

"In compliance with your request, we've looked through our posts and IP logs and have determined that all commenters discussing piracy were coming from the same subnet: 0.0.0.0/0"

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Poor man’s TOR :).

It’s not completely inconceivable that ISPs using CG-NAT could keep logs that would allow these users to be deanonymized, but it’s an extra step and they might not have enough information between the Reddit and ISP logs to do it. But… they’d have to be talking to the ISPs anyway, and the ISPs will probably cooperate?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

They may just be looking to connect a Reddit user to an ISP, then they can try to compel the ISP to give up the real identity of where the customer purchases internet service. Then it’s easy to threaten the customer to give up the user because who can afford otherwise

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


For the third time in less than a year, film studios with copyright infringement complaints against a cable Internet provider are trying to force Reddit to share information about users who have discussed piracy on the site.

In the first instance, US Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler ruled in the US District Court for the Northern District of California that the First Amendment right to anonymous speech meant Reddit didn’t have to disclose the names, email addresses, and other account registration information for nine Reddit users.

Film companies, including Bodyguard Productions and Millennium Media, had subpoenaed Reddit in relation to a copyright infringement lawsuit against Astound Broadband-owned RCN about subscribers allegedly pirating 34 movie titles, including Hellboy (2019), Rambo V: Last Blood, and Tesla.

In her ruling, Beeler noted that while the First Amendment right to anonymous speech is not absolute, the film producers had already received the names of 118 Grande subscribers.

She also said the film producers had failed to prove that “the identifying information is directly or materially relevant or unavailable from another source.”

This week, as reported by TorrentFreak, film companies Voltage Holdings, which are part of the previous two subpoenas, and Screen Media Ventures, another film studio with litigation against RCN, filed a motion to compel [PDF] Reddit to respond to the subpoena in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.


The original article contains 587 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] fhek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Reddit 💩

[–] hikikoma@ani.social 1 points 9 months ago

First tachiyomi now this, is 2024 the year the copyright trolls go on the offensive?