this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
158 points (96.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39465 readers
2158 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Say you were a guardian or parent and get to decide when a child can get a phone or use a computer and get internet with it. If you wish you can also install software and change router settings to what you see fit.

Some parents decide to forbid the internet completely, others are more relaxed. Some go the helicopter route, and some do not care whatsoever what their kid does online.

What is your policy on letting a child use the internet?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 52 minutes ago

Education education education.

Explain how the internet works. Explain companies. Explain evil intent and malicious behavior.

Imo, if you put your child under surveillance that's not the right way. If bad things happen despite good education, fine, introduce limits and guardrails.

Don't do things you wouldn't want for yourself. Be consistent.

Basically, do good parenting.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 49 minutes ago

children under 12 should not have one, it has been shown they actually have problems reading and writing in HS, and doing math. 13+ they can have it, assuming they arnt trying to do something illegal, like stealing credit cards and buying games or whatever.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 3 points 3 hours ago

ublock origin, no ads, only libretube or freetube

FOSS

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

crontab, it's enough to :

  • kill any add during specific period
  • accumulate usage per app
  • check if tabs are opened

and it's pretty straighforward to configure, e.g.

* 8-17 * * 1-5 killall SlayTheSpire && date >> ~/shame
# prevents from playing during weekday working hours

or for accumulation (which can be reset daily, weekly, etc by simply deleting the minutes file)

pgrep mpv && >> mpv_minutes; if [ $(wc -l mpv_minutes) -gt 1000 ]; then echo beyond threshold; fi

That works also for turning up/down network interfaces.

PS: I use this on myself. I'm not a child but I don't have perfect self control. It works.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

I have an 11 year old son. He has neutered Internet that can do normal searches on. An hour budget a day for games. An hour for YouTube. Other than that he can talk to his friends on Discord or text. I check his Discord every now and then. He only talks to his buddies or my gaming buddies.

[–] HeHoXa@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Electronics are for amusement. If he isn't having fun (fussing), time to do something else.

We use it together and communicate during. Zombie mode --> time to do something else.

Great firewall of my house (whitelist). I'm sure he'll figure out how to bypass it one day, and hopefully by then I've raised him well enough to process the horrors of the open web.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

Yeah I like this.

I have nothing againt electronics but doomscrolling is a sign of break-time.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 hours ago

PLEASE abandon this mindset

"electronics" are more than toys

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I automate school, weekend, and summer schedules with parental controls on mobile devices.

They're just getting into computer gaming so they had to have the internet talk (but most of their games banned chat without ID anyway)

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Block every site except itch.io until they turn 13, so as to recreate my childhood on addictinggames.com

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I only go to itch.io for erotic games.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

I thought that's what itch was for

For both of us:

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 hours ago

block every site but phrack.org

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago

Only with my eyeballs in presence. My son is autistic and barely verbal. He also has combination ADHD. I wish I could forbid the tablet entirely but it just doesn't work with a child facing these challenges. For example, he can't sit still through dinner so if we go out, he uses tablet until the food comes. He's obsessed with Legos. All the content he watches is Lego builds. He watches that on YouTube kids with me present to make sure he doesn't slip through the cracks. My eldest is 19 now and we let him access the internet unabated, that was a huge mistake I highly recommend people know exactly what their kids are watching and you should restrict traffic to safe content only.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 10 points 10 hours ago

Access to the Internet is not something that the parents are actually capable of restricting. As soon as one kid in the has a phone, their entire peer group is exposed.

The question isn't about restriction. It's about who will be teaching these kids about the Internet. The first kid learns from their parents; every other kid learns (mostly) from other kids.

If your kid is the last in their class to have a phone, everything they know about the Internet they will have learned from their peers. They sure as hell aren't going to tell you they already know about all the things you've been trying to hide from them.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world -5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The internet is for communication. A child has no reason to communicate with anyone independent of their parent. No internet.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 hours ago

dude where you do hang your iron crosses?

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Our policy was supervised / filtered only until early teens. Kids sites, educational stuff, games we purchased and approved of, etc. We were also late to give them phones, our son got his first because in his freshman year of high-school his band teacher set up a boiler-room to sell worlds finest chocolate and he was the only kid who didn't have a cell phone.

When we had "the talk" we discussed masturbation and porn, why porn is popular, and all the negatives that go with it without condemning it outright. We talked about online predators and not sharing things with people you didn't know, especially pics, addresses, etc.

My wife and I are firm believers that kids need space to discover who they are, so as they became teens, things went to semi-supervised. We paid attention to them more than their devices, but we had rules such as adding one of our emails as a recovery address to any socials they set up, so we could check up on them if we thought something bad was going down. Never had to use that, and I think just having it there made them think about what they did online.

Around sixteen/seventeen, no filter and no more backdoors into their accounts. Just a couple of long heart to hearts about how shitty things can be on the internet and how we're there to talk with no judgement if they need us.

[–] Flaco_waton@feddit.cl 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What in the world is a boiler room to sell chocolate

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Boiler room is slang for a room filled with shady stock brokers using high-pressure tactics to sell crappy stocks for fraudulent reasons.

When fund raiser time came around, his band teacher told everyone to take out their phones, call relatives, and try to get them to commit to buying x number of candy bars. It was like a little boiler room full of kids begging grandma to shell out $50 for mediocre chocolate.

I'd wait until they're older, 7-8 years of age at least. Then I'd make sure they learn how it functions in some capacity and not just operating it mindlessly.

No social media at all. Heavily curated Youtube, and honestly at the end of the day I'd rather them play outside under supervision than spend all day online. The internet as it is does not go well with developing minds.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

A friend had an excellent (but evil) one.

His son had found some more... interesting areas of the internet (aka porn). He collected a selection of his browsing history and sat him down. They then went, video by video, having an open and honest discussion about it. Dad had FAR more tolerance for mortifying embarrassment than his son did. He learnt to clear the history at least.

The 2nd discussion, 6 months later, used the router logs instead.

I'm not sure I would use this particular method. However, it was apparently highly effective at making his kids think things through (for better or for worse!).

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

Wow, I'm not sure if I am more impressed at him pulling it through or shattering the adult trust by stabbing him in the back like this.

I mean, if you (parent) didn't tell him, how should he know? It's essential to know in advance.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

this is good because it teaches the kid the importance of privacy and the entire lack thereof online.

it's also nice to not freak out at porn viewing and to teach them it's ok in moderation.

[–] troed@fedia.io 62 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When they figure it out and become capable of reading and writing. Tablets, phones and computers are not locked down. Parental guidening and open communication means they know what it is, that there's good and there's bad content and people etc.

Working great.

/Swedish

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 24 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (10 children)

You sit at a desktop in the kitchen to use the computer. If you have shown yourself to be responsible you know your password.

The wifi shuts off at bedtime.

My 11-12-13 year old kids have Apple Watches for communication purposes but no smartphones. These are charged all together in a locked pantry at night.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] alakey@piefed.social 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Start educating them on what internet is and how it works early, before they even get to use it. Allow them to observe how you use it. Explain the good and the bad it can provide. I feel like a lot of how you should use the internet is just how you should generally live your life - stranger = danger, don't give your personal information to anyone at all (even if they claim to be me/my friend/police/whatever), understand how content engagement works and who benefits from it (ads and manipulation are everywhere, not just online), and so on. Ngl I'm kinda baffled how we navigated a much more dangerous real world "just fine" up until the internet has apparently become some unfathomable evil. By not allowing your kids to learn early, you are just gimping their future, they will have to go up against people who often literally don't know a life without the digital world. Not to mention - if you don't teach them the basics of understanding how to navigate the world and its dangers, they can get hurt whether the internet still even exists.

My one opinion that might be controversial is that I believe that by enforcing arbitrary blocklists (outside of just generally useful stuff like uBlock Origin) and restricting content without explaining and demonstrating anything you are simply conditioning your kids to be ok with surveillance and censorship.

[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago

The ipad is fine I have a secure network no porn and no voice over roblox. The trick is not to just take it but give them the 10 min warning and they will just bring it to you. We always check his communications and remind him not to share any personal information with anyone online. He has a healthy relationship with the internet and his devices. Sometimes to get his ipad he needs to go for a walk with me which makes for good conversation and it’s good for his health.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

So I am a parent, and while my daughter is still a toddler (3), I've thought about it a lot. These plans may not hold as time goes on, but it's what I'll be working from at least.

We have an old Android tablet that is "Daddy's" where I've used ADB to remove almost every app from it, and hide the others. It has Disney Plus (some kids shows), Newpipe (set to open right to a playlist of pre-vetted stuff, mostly Sesame Street), and VLC (Mr. Rogers, Muppet Movies and Specials, some Looney Tunes). It only comes out on long trips (car rides more than two hours long), use is always supervised, and we lock the touch controls as much as we can once the content is playing so she can't stray into other YouTube content or the more grown up stuff on Disney.

I'm already working on a Kodi setup with just content for her on it as well, which is reach-able from the living room TV and will be on the play room TV if it gets one. All of Mr. Roger's Neighborhood is up on archive.org, and she loves it. Wife doesn't like piracy though, so I can't just get baby girl's Disney shows on it and make it a one stop shop.

As she gets older, we may set her up with an old laptop and edutainment games, but it would be entirely offline. Maybe a Minecraft server for her and friends we've met IRL. A co-worker runs one for his tween and it seems to do well used that way.

I don't think we'll be allowing internet until 12 years old or so. Even if she needs it earlier for school, she'll start on an isolated network segment to reduce chance of any malware spreading to the whole house. Use will be in a common area of the house where Mom and I can see what she's into at a glance. It will be filtered with PiHole or whatever the modern equivalent ends up being, to block both ads and inappropriate content. Ad blocker on the device itself with similar settings if possible to help catch any strays.

As she gets older, start teaching media and advertising literacy, as other comments have suggested. As we do that, we slowly scale back the training wheels/filters. Depending on how well we think she's ready, I can see unattended, still filtered, but somewhat monitored at 14 maybe. Cut the content filters at 15 maybe. Cut the ad filters at 16 maybe. That's all going to be super-dependent on her own "internet and ad literacy" though.

I want her to get enough of an idea of the unfiltered and ad-ridden internet that it's not a danger to her, but I do hope she'll decide to use ad blocking for her own sake.

17 or 18 it's completely hands off. Can't protect them forever, and she'll need to learn one way or another.

My goal is to protect her from creeps, protect her from exposure to stuff she's too young for, and to make sure she's prepared for the wider internet hellscape before dropping her in the deep end unsupervised like I was.

I'd be very interested in hearing the experience of any parents who have already been through this.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 15 points 22 hours ago

Fuck that, kids shouldn't be on the Internet unsupervised. No access when they're little and restricted access until they're an adult or close it it.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

kids get YouTube for 15 minutes a week.

everything else comes from Plex which has been vetted by myself or my spouse.

no internet access other than a school sanctioned chomebook.

I have a windows XP (sp3) system setup with encarta, local Wikipedia, and a bunch of other early learning computer software/games. it connects to the network for intranet, but no internet access at all.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

get them debian instead of windows xp please

load more comments
view more: next ›