this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
139 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29783 readers
2197 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 101 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Key quote:

Therefore, your request that 'the federal government should give a $5,000 tax rebate for all new electric car purchases' means that the federal government must take that money out of the pockets of hardworking people who may not have the means to buy an electric vehicle in the first place.

You also take my hard-earned money and give it to oil companies, private prisons, and data centers when I don't own any of those things. 🤔

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey don't forget defense contractors, they have to eat too.

They can eat shit, and I'll give them all they want.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 51 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What many folks do not realize is that the money that 'comes from' the federal government actually comes from ordinary citizens who pay taxes to support that government.

You know, she's absolutely right. In fact, that also applies to congress' salaries and benefits, so maybe we should cut those, too. After all, we wouldn't want to take money from ordinary citizens who pay taxes and might not be able to afford to buy a congressperson.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

Nobody doesn't realize this. We know it's our money. We know you're supposed to reinvest it back into programs and infrastructure that will benefit us. 10 year olds realize this.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or more importantly, afford health insurance. If only there was some sort of universal way to insure everyone’s health…

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago

That's crazy talk, there's no way that would work. Has even one country managed to pull that off?

Some people are literally too poor to own a lib.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago

Low hanging fruit. Cut the billions being spent to kill people. And just ending there, it's hard to say which situation I'm talking about, isn't it? So much of "ordinary people's money" being spent in the wrong ways, all for the benefit of a few, or one.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 34 points 3 days ago

Between this; the recent harassment of the 10 year old boy with the Sephora haul; MTG yelling at Parkland survivors, the "masterdebation" of Charlie Kirk; the right-wing demonization of the families of Sandy Hook shooting victims, and the sick acts Republican state legislators do to underage teenagers in motel rooms; I'm sensing a trend here...

The trend is that Republicans like to exploit vulnerable people to feel powerful, because they're vile, disgusting and miserable people underneath their armor.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm sorry but I just want these people dead already so we can move on with our lives.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the hag in this case is technically undead.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago

Find and destroy her phylactery.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

or do something completely deviant and off the wall and stop voting for them.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

In her letter, Foxx cited numerous articles from news organizations and criticized the boy's teacher, writing, "Please ask your teacher to explain propaganda to you. My guess is that your teachers will not give you a good educational experience and help you learn to think as they are too interested in indoctrinating you."  

I think this is the bad part. Don't know why everyone is so focused on the tax part.

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago

These people are literally ghouls in a death cult

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I guess people still don't realize that e-bike subsidies are proven to be more effective for reducing carbon emissions than EV subsidies.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Wrt ebikes the money is better spent on bike infrastructure. Individual people can buy ebikes, individual people can not build bike infrastructure. That's what government does.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

E-bikes seem awesome and I'm not interested in taking away subsidies for them. That having been said, I commute an hour long drive by car each way, so unfortunately a car is essential for me to keep my job. Housing is ludicrously expensive near the power plant I work at, and nothing close to my home pays nearly as well as my job does. I just installed a charger at home and bought a used EV like two days before we started bombing Iran, so I really lucked out on avoiding gas prices. Of course I'd love to subsidize EVs to encourage more people to transition to them, but honestly just doing the math on refueling and maintenance cost differences should be more then enough to sway a lot of people. If you can charge at home and you already need a new car, it doesn't make sense not to choose a good EV. The tech is finally here for that.

If I had a use for a bike or small motorcycle, I'd choose an e-bike. Maybe I'll get one for popping into town and grabbing a burger and a beer or similar outings, but I just don't think I'd use it more than a few times per year.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

What a ghoul.