this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
336 points (98.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21410 readers
808 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    all 47 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 51 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I wonder if these idiots know you can buy a second-hand laptop for less than half of that $40,000 and install Linux on it yourself

    [–] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)
    [–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
    [–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
    [–] Huschke@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

    When it's this cold outsight?

    [–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

    Hell if you give me $10000, just a quarter of the initial amount, I could get you a brand new laptop and still have a few bucks to give you back as change.

    [–] ExLisper@linux.community 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I don't get it. The article says that hardware is 1974 was expensive but UNIX was cheap to develop. Linus developing Linux just confirms what they are saying. Is the joke that computers used to be expensive and now they are cheap?

    [–] kindernacht@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The joke is that a couple of drunk guys enduring an eternal winter came up with something better than silicon valley could.

    [–] ExLisper@linux.community 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    Not to argue about a joke but Linux was 'better' because it was free, not because it was technically better. By the time it got actually better than UNIX tons of people have worked on it, not just couple of drunk guys. I think someone just misread what the article says and missed the 'not' in 'need not be expensive'. But if people find it funny it's cool, it's not for me to judge anyone's sense of humour.

    [–] kindernacht@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

    Personally, it's amusing at best. In the same way as the girl in Jurassic Park using "Unix" to hack the system.

    That being said, I still give mad props for the development that occurred during that era.

    [–] Ilgaz@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

    I think you should really ask around about product usage scenarios especially in Redhat/SUSE scenes. Linux is either same price or more expensive than Windows.

    I think you say Minix was better but let me remind that it's creator himself says it was created for a very different purpose and still does it well. Its version 3 runs whole Intel World so it may have even "won"

    I worked in TV industry and I knew some very high end studios. The amazingly expensive software they use needs a very reliable system without any kind of vendor lock in. They choose RHEL or SUSE on tested, certified hardware. OS price is just a small detail, like coffee machine supplies.

    I have worked with very high end Microsoft Windows servers too. Did you know that their browser default homepage is MSN, not about:blank and it actually triggered Flash ActiveX install? I begun to see Windows like abuse of Dave Cutler's kernel. No less.

    [–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

    I think someone just misread what the article says and missed the 'not' in 'need not be expensive'.

    You've missed the second part of that sentence - 'UNIX can run on hardware costing as little as $40,000'. The photo is the Finnish hacker making it work on a computer that cost a fraction of that, while drinking a beer. It's a play on the hold my beer meme.

    [–] Ilgaz@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

    It is still the same deal. Do you think high level suits can really understand the idea of GNU and Linux completely?

    Some guy from a remote village in India can climb up to a hill for better reception and upload a couple of a hundred lines to the right place in right format and it could be accepted in Linux kernel which may eventually run in a IBM System Z monster with 40TB of RAM. That code may add 2x performance to a very crucial part. I think those blue suits simply ignore this fact to keep their corporate mind sanity. Seen old S360 photos? They really dress that way.

    Btw, I didn't stereotypically make up that Indian guy climbing story. I used his OS distribution rather than multi billion Chinese giant version since it was simply better. Hundreds of thousands did. The village he lived sometimes lost power too. Of course, he added more team members later.

    [–] Ilgaz@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

    UNIX was a small and inexpensive open source system and could create miracles for such a low price.

    When Linus came into scene, UNIX was heavily fragmented, expensive, closed with some insane trickery to make sure nobody cross compiles anything on the "enemy UNIX" (rival). I don't say go and read them but the size of auto tools should give a clue. It is one of the under rated inventions of GNU. Obviously BSD people have their own valid counter point too.

    The only serious thing around was still Novell who begun to take UNIX serious right after Linux had a serious shape. I remember my company paid a Novell tech $2000 to restore the files from their SCSI. It wasn't a rip off, that is what happens when you use a closed system. Who knows how much money Novell took for training. For the curious: They still didn't buy a tape backup system.

    We should just read first lines, check photo additionally remembering all those suits at IBM, Sun and MS and laugh. That is what meme is for. :-)

    I also laugh whenever I see the quote of a open source developer with a cowboy hat in elevator of MS .

    MS guy (with BillG tone): I am sorry but who are you? OSS guy: I am your worst nightmare!

    [–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    UNIX in Bell Labs back in the 70's might need $40,000 worth of hardware, today you can get an old Raspberry Pie for like $50.

    [–] Scrollone@feddit.it 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    $50??? The Zero model costs like 15 dollars

    [–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    I haven't fucked with a Raspberry pie in a long time, lol, I was just making a point. I don't think they come with any storage so you still have to get like a $20 USB drive.

    [–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    To be fair, Bell Labs' 40,000$ computer probably didn't come with any storage either.

    [–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

    Those were the punch card days, storage was a lot different back then. Everything was running in the RAM, and rebooting took like a day to get everything running again.

    [–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

    128gb sd cards are ~$15 bucks from a reputable seller, but you don’t need one that big to run linux

    [–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    That would be an expensive pie. I also don’t know how it’s going to help me with running unix.

    The joke: The single board computer is called a Raspberry Pi

    [–] Ilgaz@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

    That $40K is way more than it seems and it is still cheap. To give an idea about the cutting edge hardware prices back in the day, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_2250?wprov=sfla1

    The price you are reading is correct, $2M today. That is what happens when you want 1024×1024 display and pointing device like that NSA spy girl.

    I think one should compare it to an entry level AIX/Power system or HP/UX. Apple does still have certified UNIX OS too.