this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
97 points (99.0% liked)

News

37743 readers
1634 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/64500038

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I drive about 1500 mi/mo. Switching to an EV dropped my monthly fueling cost from $150-200 to $50-60. Plus the savings from not having to get oil changes every 5-6 months...

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Cool, can I borrow 50k for a non piece of shit one?

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

U.S here, and I'm legit considering selling my CR-V and getting a used electric if I could find one, provided it could go more than 40 miles on a charge and wouldn't need a ridiculously expensive battery replacement in like 3 years.

I drive like 45 minutes to and from work, and filling this little tank multiple times a week is BRUTAL.

Thing is, we're still paying off the SUV and I was worried it'd be all stupid over-inflated like everybody would be doing this due to gas prices...maybe?

...and no, I want nothing to do with Tesla and their "swastikars" and "kampfwagens".

I just wonder which electrics would be at least a LITTLE user-respecting...the car spyware lately is ridiculous. We really need FOSS cars and firmware...

...but now I'm ranting...lol

...Is it still possible to switch without being rich or am I too late? Haha.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Most EVs being sold now will go at least a couple hundred miles on a full charge if you don't drive like a maniac. And if you find yourself stuck with a low charge, level 3 chargers are pretty widely available and can get you to 80% in a half hour or less. Kia and Hyundai are good options on a budget, just don't look at the high-end models like the Ioniqs. We bought a used Kia Niro EV last year. It's a great little commuter car for my wife since her employer is making her drive into the office every day now. Nissan Leafs are often pretty affordable used, too. I'm with you on Tesla. The dealerships were flooded with them when we went looking last summer, and they were desperate to sell us one. "Are you sure? I can make you a great deal on a Tesla!" Not interested.

Sadly, you might be about a year late for the really good deals, and the Republicans allowed the EV tax credits to expire in September. If you can't find a good deal on an EV, you might consider a hybrid, or pluggable hybrid (a hybrid with a larger battery that can be charged when it isn't running). A former co-worker of mine used to drive a Chevy Volt pluggable hybrid to work and bragged that he only filled the tank once a year.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

All cars spy on you not just the electrics. But it’s simple enough to disconnect the TCM or bridge a resistor across the antenna terminals.

If you really want out of box no spying get an old Nissan leaf. They use 3G and 4G radios and were never upgraded to 5G so when the towers shut down they had. Nothing to communicate with.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

45 miles? Unless you're looking at someone more than 10 years old you won't have a problem.

And on the battery... even with a battery problem you don't need to replace the whole battery. You need to replace the cell that's borked. There are battery repair specialists that will do this.

The car spyware problem is across all cars. ICE and EV

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Not all battery packs can replace individual cells. Tesla models (Model S/X) use cylindrical cells glued into modules, while newer models (such as structural 4680 packs) are epoxied together to form a solid brick. Why? Because Elon Musk is an asshole.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 hours ago
[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 8 points 18 hours ago

It's even more of a no-brainer in Quebec, where gasoline is almost $2/litre (USD $5.50 per US gallon), but electricity is only about $0.07/kWh.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I wish there were more plug-in hybrids. I know there's added complexity in the mechanics, but I've been enjoying 99+% electric driving for almost 10 years now and I feel like more would be willing to try it out if they had that "just in case" gas backup instead of having to take a full plunge all at once. They may find that they don't need that extended range as much as they'd think.

[–] ___@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 20 hours ago

PHEVs accomplish exactly this. It's good to hear that people are actually mostly charging their PHEVs according to this recent Toyota study.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's a damn obvious finding.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Not as obvious as you might think. They're taking into account the emissions from electricity generation to charge the vehicle (which can vary widely depending on where you live), climate effects, traffic, and individual driving habits. Given all that, it turns out that it's still a pretty decisive conclusion, but when you start getting talking points from someone on the side of fossil fuels, it helps to have all the boxes checked.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's insanely cool to charge your car from your own solar panels, and drive almost for free. The only "cost" is what you would have received from selling the electricity instead, and selling electricity is for peanuts compared to buying.
At least that's how it works here in Denmark.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Indeed it is. Unfortunately for most people without subsidies this is difficult to achieve.

The US needs to subsidize the crap out of EVs and solar, once people start experiencing this they will never go back but gotta get people over the adoption hump.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There used to be subsidies. Then everyone decided it would be cool to vote for Trump.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago

Hey not everyone! Just enough dum dums.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are no subsidies on solar panels here! And EV cars just have lower registration tax, they aren't actually subsidized.
ICE cars have higher taxes because they pollute more, and we have tax on gas to limit the use of it.

USA has failed on such policies for half a century. Which is a major reason why American cars pollute about twice as much as European cars on average. USA is an environmental villain, that never lifted their share of the burden of protecting the environment for the future.

Being clean should not need to be subsidized, but polluting should absolutely be taxed.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well Americans are also culturally stupid unfortunately. They need to be handed a carrot and beaten with a stick in order to do the right thing.

The rest of the world isn’t this dumb.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Don’t understand what this means. What is the “right” thing?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The rest of the world isn’t this dumb.

You’re forgetting about Alberta, Canada.

[–] mitram@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why the hate on Alberta specifically?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Alberta does very dumb things. It's the Florida of Canada.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They're trying to hold a referendum to leave Canada and join the US

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

Should just set up a citizenship exchange program, swap the separatists with the persecuted minorities the US is so hellbent of getting rid of.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

True, but I bet most Americans can do what we did just as cheap. It's just that NOT doing it is way cheaper in USA, because polluting is free in USA.
For us putting solar panels on the roof, and buying a decent EV, and changing the heating system to an air to water heat pump for central heating of the house, will combined be almost as expensive as it was to buy the house.

So yes investments are required, but today about 80% of Scandinavians buying a new car are buying a BEV.
That alone is a HUGE step, because even when charged from the grid, our electricity is about 80% renewable!

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m sure they can, but I’ll refer back to the dumb culture issue. It’s not a matter of being able to do it, it’s that they won’t because engine go brr with dino juicies.

It’s that stupid, you can’t reason with stupid.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I know that's true for about half the population, that they don't give a shit about the environment, because fuck the liberals.
But obviously it's not all. There are good Americans, although it seems to me they are a minority.
But yes as a society you are right, USA is way way behind most of the developed world.