this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
88 points (96.8% liked)

Canada

12028 readers
542 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think Carney was playing nice. He's pragmatic. It is going to take a long time for Canada to shift off exporting to the US. May as well sell what we can until we have other markets. He's just using Trump's language to flatter him because, why not, it's free, and often works. I don't think Carney, or 90% of Canadians, believe our long term solution is to go back to the way things were with the US. That relationship is dead and gone.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

He is really good at playing the "game" and right now it is easy because he opponents are idiots. You don't lead two central banks without learning how to navigate through politics.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

So sick of news about his bullshit. For discussion's sake, I'm wondering if anyone here shares my view with regard to dealing with his threats:

  1. Carney needs to stop trying to play nice with this clown. The Canadian people will not get shit from him.

  2. Canadian media needs to stop reacting to his shenanigans all the time in outrage or fear because it legitimizes him as a tyrant. We need to be mentally prepared for the worst but play it cool. Make him aware that we know that he's a fucking moron—not a big scary yank emperor that he wants to be seen as. "President of Israeli colony and Epstein File headliner shakes baby-sized fists at Canada in anger... Again" would be a much better title, no?

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 7 points 10 hours ago

Honestly the world should fucking laugh at MAGA.

The only time they collectively freaked the fuck out was when Walz was calling him weird. The media had a conniption that someone spoke such a blatant truth to people.

[–] opus86@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I can't imagine the Canadian people not revolting at a forced annexation, and the moron needs to be removed because of this type of bullshit.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

We have plenty of guns. We don't use them to shoot up schools, but we have some good ideas about what they can be used for. Show up and find out, MAGA.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Shocked_Pikachu.gif

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Why do so many presumably educated people not know how fascism works? It's gone down the same way every time in history and there's no reason it would be different now. You can't appease it or go along with it, everyone is consumed in the end because that's how fascism fucking works.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Neoliberals are fucking morons. They are best described as fascism's PR team

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I think lots of presumably educated people underestimate how fascist Trump can be. It's not that they don't know how fascist ideology works, it's more like they can't come to terms that the worst predictions about blatantly fascist Trump get are still not pessimistic enough.

And also, I don't think the "appeasement" of fascists come purely from not realizing that they're dealing with fascism. It's more like a tight rope where you know you're fucked but if you play it right you can reduce damages. While I'd love to tell Trump to eat shit, that can't be our foreign relations policy.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

You don’t appease fascists and bullies.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think the article's "appeasement" angle is pretty bullshit.

No one in NATO is boosting military spending to appease Donald Trump - it's the inevitable response to the realization that the largest NATO contributor is unreliable.

The recent "MAGA" line was an appeal to American investors to spend money here. It appropriated Trump's language, but that's the opposite of what he wants.

Carney campaigned in decreased reliance on the US, not on severing all ties.

Actual examples of appeasement would be things like ending the digital services tax, and I'm sure we'll see more like it when the CUSMA talks get started.

[–] GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Thanks for this and you hit the nail on the head. Fighting openly with Trump is exactly what he wants and will just escalate things. You always have to smile, nod, take a deep breath and play the long game with him

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Adding some much needed nuance to the conversation

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Trump demanded increased NATO spending and the countries did it. This isn't rocket science.

MAGA is a white supremacist phrase through and through. There is no excuse for repeating it.

And Carney did cancel the DST, and is fast-tracking LNG projects owned by Trump allies, and continues to put money down of F-35s, and now cancelled the streaming tax. Oh and signed contracts with a little old company called Palantir.

Genuinely asking: what would he have to do? Where is the line?

[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 14 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Appeasement would be things like worrying about the US's reaction and increasing reliance on them. Or doing stupid things like assisting Trump with his little Middle East hissyfit when he keeps asking.

Instead we're making deals with China, America's biggest enemy, and we're deeply increasing ties with the EU, to the point that EU leaders are joking about membership.

Unfortunately, we do have deep ties to the US, that we've built over centuries, deliberately suiciding that relationship would be economically catastrophic, and I have to say I'm really happy with how quickly we're working to build external relationships.

Our reliance on the US is rapidly decreasing, and we're building relationships for our key industries, such as large defence contracts with the EU, where we can now sell weapons there on similar terms as member states.

That said, I'm as unhappy as anyone with stuff like the Palantir deal, and I don't know that we need F-35s either, but these things move really slowly, and I'm sympathetic that there's good reasons not to rock the boat with the US more than necessary. We're fighting plenty on the really important things, we can't die on every hill without directly hurting the quality of life of Canadians.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago

Our reliance on the US is rapidly decreasing

based on what metric? Carney is pushing for increased oil extraction by US companies, and LNG terminals owned by Trump allies. Just in the last day or two Canada cancelled the streaming tax. Then there's the combo of Bill C-22 and the CLOUD act, which would essentially share ALL our data with the US surveillance state. Canada is routinely turning over refugees to ICE. The federal government continues to sign contracts with companies like Garda and Roshel who are contracting with ICE. We have failed to do anything to help Cuba - yet Mexico is doing so and is suffering no horrifying consequences. And when Carney invokes MAGA we think he's just playing games? What would it take to change your mind?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Trump demanded increased NATO spending and the countries did it. This isn’t rocket science.

No, it's not rocket science. Trump continually threatens to abandon NATO and its allies, so everyone else has to pick up the slack. Not because he wants it, but because it's an absolute necessity. I really don't see a credible argument that Canada shouldn't be investing in defence.

MAGA is a white supremacist phrase through and through. There is no excuse for repeating it.

A defensible position to take, but I think Carney's intent in using it is fairly clear, whether you agree with it or not.

And Carney did cancel the DST

That's why I used it as an example. The article should have, but didn't. There are a number of things that could legitmately be held up as examples of "appeasement," but I don't think the article did so.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No, it’s not rocket science. Trump continually threatens to abandon NATO and its allies, so everyone else has to pick up the slack. Not because he wants it, but because it’s an absolute necessity. I really don’t see a credible argument that Canada shouldn’t be investing in defence.

No one is saying "Canada shouldn't be investing in defence", they are saying we shouldn't be doubling or tripling our military budget to satisfy Trump's demands, and that we should take a "diplomacy first" approach to conflict. Anyway, for comparison: Iran's total military budget IIRC is $8 billion. We already spend many times this amount. Besides, NATO has only ever come to the aid of the US, never the other way around.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

we shouldn’t be doubling or tripling our military budget to satisfy Trump’s demands

I simply don't think many people would agree that that's the reason we're doing it.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works -1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

policy by polling is not a good way to form your own opinion. Do you think we should be doubling or tripling our military budget?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 14 hours ago

I thought it was pretty clear that I do, for the reasons already stated.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Trump demanded increased NATO spending and the countries did it.

Yes, but Trump assumed they would do that spending with the USA's millitary vendors.

And then those countries that he has been threatening and bullying decided to find better suppliers!

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

we have continued to put down money on more F-35s. Most of the suppliers at CANSEC were American. Do you have numbers to share on your claims here?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Appeasement never works. In fact, it always has the opposite effect. He just doubles down as soon as he sees "weakness". You either fight him until he backs down, or he'll roll right over you.

Fuck Trump. Carney needs to do what we voted for him to do, and fight.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Carney literally did the whole speech about appeasement is bad and that's all he's being doing

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca -2 points 21 hours ago

Unless you're like, you know, paying attention.

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 23 points 1 day ago

Appeasement doesnt exactly have a great track record as a strategy... 😅

Maybe a different strategy? Please?

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

Just spinning the Wheel of Distraction at this point

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You cannot appease the orange shitbag

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

At least you shouldn't appease it

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 20 points 1 day ago

Shut the fuck up, Donnie.