Going forward they should do it think it through,
mutes audio for the rest of the sentence
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
153 points (95.3% liked)
Mildly Infuriating
46210 readers
379 users here now
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.
-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body
-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
He's complaining about having to turn it into opposing traffic because the road is now too narrow. Then the footage shows him very clearly barely turning the wheel. I've taken sharper turns than that without going on to the opposing lane. This guy just doesn't know how to drive.
"it was intended to make roads safer, but one guy told us it's done just the opposite"
Okay, so I guess that one guy being angry is the opposite of safety.
"I'm going to drive recklessly out of spite!"
- yes, those gigantic trucks need to fuck right off (the expert also essentially said that)
- it is meant to make people drive slower and more carefully. If they don't do that then yes, that means more accidents
- good project but in my country those 2 poles every 100 yards or so wouldn't be enough. Yes, it costs a little more to implement this properly
I've never heard of a city making a road less safe with the intention of slowing down traffic.
Depending on how you frame it, that happens all the time. For example, a speedbump causes speed reduction, but at high speeds it causes (momentary) loss of control. Or narrowing the road, which means less margin for error.
People will drive their cars as fast as feels safe. By introducing hazards, you make people slow down which increases safety, but each feature in isolation could be said to be dangerous in some way, y'know?
There's no entitlement like the entitlement of shit drivers.
"But my car wouldn't have any damage if it was just the usual soft pedestrian!"
This just in: shitty drivers don't know the size of their vehicle. More on this at 6 (apparently).
To be honest those gray small concrete blocks with funny useless poles in them are really a bad road UI design.
Not visible enough and too small to be effective anyway....
So while the complaints are stupid, they have a point: make those road blockers bigger and more visible. Maybe more signage as well....
it's more UX than UI here, no?
I guess you could say that the user interfaces with the concrete block via their shiny chrome rims on bald rubber band tires
Yeah ... No native speaker here ..... :)
They’re less ugly than a jersey barrier and do less damage to cars that can’t stay in their lane while still protecting cyclists.
But yeah, visibility is key. I wonder if they are still visible in ten years. That’s my only objection to things like raised crossings: once the paint wears off or in snow they become a lot less visible and no longer as effective. I hate that both as a driver and a cyclist
This is mostly a US problem though. Road designers in the US just don't seem to actually understand how to implement these things in a sensible manner.
The way to do things like raised crossings is to make them out of a different type of road surface, moving over to brick pavers is common, so there's always a visual indication.
Yeah we don’t spend money on road maintenance, only road creation
I mean, the blue shirt guy admitted that some vehicles might have to turn over the median into oncoming traffic to avoid the thing on the road. That isn't great, in defense of people not liking this change. That's dangerous, and bad design.
The large vehicles he's referring to are industrial large vehicles. Which require special licensing. Even the big ass pickup truck they showed could make the turn with no issues at all going at a reasonable speed.
Even the truck they showed in the video that went into the other lane didn't need to. It's just shit drivers in vehicles that are too large. So many large ass truck grocery getters.
Not every truck a municipality's public works department uses is this size. You don't need special licensing to drive a dual wheel F350 long bed, and I'd wager that might be a problem to turn that corner depending on what it has in it. If they need to replace signs, or even just do road work, they need to be able to turn that corner. I have a lot of questions about this.
What happens when it's an ambulance (a lot of those are built on f450 chassis and don't require an CDL).
Fair point. Just might not be great adding those things near turns. Or what are they even for?
Also from context I think that's a residential neighbourhood so how many large trucks are going to be driving through?
Any municipal vehicle. They don't get sewage backups or anything? They never need an ambulance?
Probably a lot of garbage trucks?
Just go slowly and stop if there is a car coming.
Yes , pretty common for large vehicles to have to to this sooner or later. Driver shouldn't be operating such large vehicles if their training and licensing, and knowledge of turning circle isn't enough for them to know how to do this safely.
We should be discouraging unnecessarily large vehicles anyway, ideally through urban design like this. Another element I like is sequential speed bumps with uneven gaps, smaller vehicles already going reasonable speeds can just weave through the gaps, larger vehicles going fast are required to slow.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(14 replies)
What is the problem? Looks like enough room for the cars.
view more: next ›