draco_aeneus

joined 1 month ago
[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Lots of scientific progress was made before the capitalist mode of production, so "laboring to produce capital" is anachronistic.

The core point you're making is correct though. Only certain classes of people (rich people and monks) were freed up by the surplus of production of what is required to sustain life.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

If you assume the flags stand for official government positions, then this meme makes sense. This is further supported by the fact that normal people don't think in terms of "one China policy" (like the post's title implies) but rather in terms of "unification", as you wrote.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The joke is that deaf people have been farting freely, thinking nobody could know they tooted. It's the fact other people know that's important here.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

We cannot know, in the same way we cannot know that it doesn't contain code that is hand-written on graph paper and scanned in via OCR.

The standards for code submissions for the kernel are extremely high, and their review process very strict and complete. There are no barriers stopping LLM generated code from entering the code base, but the barrier of entry for the code quality itself is so high that you have to submit code at the quality of a seasoned and competent engineer.

Ultimately, does it matter that the code was LLM written if the quality is sufficiently high?

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago
  1. The prompt says explicitly that you have to sit on it. You can only do that once (and realistically, zero times).
  2. The bench implies but doesn't guarantee to summon the people. Given it works on future/past people also, you're probably chatting with their spirit or something.
[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

The problem with this approach is twofold.

  1. The AI doesn't know what anything is either. It can annotate faster than you, but if it is all wrong, that doesn't help.
  2. The primary reason the code is bad, and something the AI is particularly weak at without a human doing much of the thinking for it is architecture. Working your way through ship-of-theseus-style isn't going to address the fundamental reason the code is difficult to work with. The architecture.
[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 2 points 4 days ago

People with ADHD can only work on tasks if they are one of the following:

  • Urgent
  • Interesting
  • Novel

This is probably why Habitica fell off for you. The novelty wore off.

I myself have had decent success with the 'Pomodoro' technique (work for 20 minutes, break for 5 minutes. Repeat that 4 times, then have a long break). Alternatively, perhaps you could add 'urgency' by setting a daily alarm which means you have to clean right then?

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think you forgot how many absolutely trash games were being made.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 9 points 4 days ago

There's no way that the first victim that comes to mind to someone who is serious about this would be 'landlords'. This is a truly sad tyre.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 5 points 5 days ago

The websites have different (more) safeguards than the APIs do, so bots will operate on different rules.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Wow, I'm surprised you were able to make meat eating even more evil than it already was.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 65 points 5 days ago (10 children)

ICE had a signup bonus (dunno how much, $4000, I think?), and nobody received it yet.

The guy who is 'famous for not paying' is Trump, who has a history of being in debt/not paying his debts off.

view more: next ›