this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
94 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21755 readers
1320 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/50517085

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Skin cancer right now in Sardinia.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they keep talking about how it's for ecological protection but never explain what one thing has to do with the other. how does limiting umbrellas protect the environment?

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unless I'm missing something, it's literally just that they think a beach full of umbrellas is ugly.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not that people might leave them behind and junk up the beach and ocean?

I could believe any of these reasons, honestly.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A beach umbrella doesn't seem like the kind of thing often left behind, whereas many smaller items would be. Still, based on the evident size of that beach, the effort seems fairly trivial for a public employee to take a quick look after closing time such as to remove potential umbrellas left behind.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You'd think, but people leave behind the dumbest/most useful things sometimes.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

My 2nd sentence covers that possibility, tho.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It goes real well with the earring

[–] manxu@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I went and dug up Italian articles. The backstory is that there was a devastating fire due to human causes, so they came up with the umbrella ban to make access unpalatable and limit human occupation.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

You don't even need Italian articles, it's in the OP

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 19 points 1 week ago

This is far removed from coherent thought.

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

Sure and next year they start renting them out.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you have a pop up tent?

[–] manxu@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it's specifically forbidden, along with portable gazebos.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No mention of yurts?

Sweet!

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

What about a shack? Is that allowed?

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Think of the children under 10!

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 1 week ago

And the children over 65 clearly don't take any shit from City Hall.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They are.. they get umbrellas.

I can sort of understand their logic. That's no longer a beach, just a sea of plastic.