this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
116 points (100.0% liked)

News

38003 readers
2366 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

About 40 million people and 5.5 million acres of cropland depend on the Colorado for drinking water and irrigation, but its flow has gradually diminished over the past two decades as the climate becomes warmer and more arid across the West. Now the arcane system of water rights governing the river entitles each state and Mexico to far more water than is actually available. The rules prioritize the longest-established uses of water, in many cases dating to the 1850s and 1860s.

Not really discussed much: the water mostly goes to food for cows and cars, not people

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This isn't a "prolonged drought;" this is normal. It's the weirdly wet period a century or so ago that was the outlier!

The real problem here is that all the engineering and legal agreements governing who gets access to how much water was fundamentally built on a fantasy.

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just fantasy. It was determined on gallons instead of some percentage of the water flowing. Nature doesn’t care about how many gallons humans want to divvy up.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Number of gallons of the water flowing during an unusually wet period, making the resulting number a fantasy relative to the amount of water normally available.

[–] dreksob@feddit.online 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Its really not "normal", global warming has caused huge shifts in how snowpack is put down, and how aquafers are (not) being recharged, as well as hotter temps driving a huge change in rainfall patterns, so that vegetation drinks a lot of the snowmelt that would normally make it into the river.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Global warming sure doesn't help, but the Colorado basin was dry AF even before the industrial revolution. IIRC, the Anasazi got fucked over in a similar way.

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago
[–] socphoenix@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The account of alfalfa here on the western slope of Colorado is insane considering the decades long drought…

[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What is alfafa used for there? Animal feed?

[–] dreksob@feddit.online 4 points 18 hours ago

Its basically a way to export water internationally, alfalfa takes a huge amount of water to grow, so grow it here where the water laws are basically whoever has money wins, and they ship it out.

Animal feed but a lot of it is exported. It's one of those crops that if it was only produced for internal use wouldn't be so bad but a lot of it is exported while also being exported.

[–] socphoenix@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Yes, unsure if it’s staying local though, if I’m remembering articles from a year ago right some of those farms are owned by Saudi Arabia and are shipping it out.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I thought the SC just settled that case? Kinda cool when NM opens up Elephant Butte and the river starts flowing again.