this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
124 points (99.2% liked)

News

38074 readers
2257 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edi Zitron has an exclusive report on OpenAI's 2025 finances:

The financial condition of OpenAI is deeply concerning. $38.53 billion in losses are astronomical, and far higher than most believed it would be. Losses also appear to be mounting year-over-year at a dramatic rate, and I’m not sure how this company finds a way toward any kind of sustainability or profitability.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 34 points 1 week ago

It's almost as if scaling models infinitely for ever decreasing returns requires infinitely more power and data...

Who could have predicted this?! Aside from OpenAI in 2020 in a paper on AI Scaling Laws, and Deepmind who later corrected their math.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

They spent 33 Billion more to make 10 billion more. Brilliant business!

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What does it usually mean when large sectors of the tech economy are propped up by stock price?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How does this work? If I make less money than I spend, I'll end up bankrupt with all my possessions sold and possibly in prison. They can't be able to pay the suppliers. How are they still a working company? I really hope all of the AI bullshit goes bankrupt.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They borrowed money from their suppliers, who all made investments in each other. The Open AI invests in the suppliers. Infinite money glitch lol.

[–] Bananskal@nord.pub 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But you can't invest more than what was invested into your business, unless you somehow create money out of nothing. How did that part happen? Or did their suppliers seriously let them put all their billions of dollars worth of shit on a tab like in a bar?

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You definitely can invest more. Leverage is a thing, allowing a company to exceed its available assets for an investment they believe they can make even more money on.

Highly leveraged companies (used to) be seen as risky. But we live in strange times and sophisticated investors don't seem to care anymore …

[–] Bananskal@nord.pub 3 points 1 week ago

I don't get it. So, investors just pay with promises these days? Promises all the way along the chain? It's like the industry is its own bank system.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 12 points 1 week ago

for now? they are floating on vc money, but their losses are so monstrously huge that they spent good chunk of all of it available worldwide. the way they got it was by promising replacement of work by their bots, aided by captive press and six billion marketing budget from openai alone. but they don't have plan to get profitable, and when money influx stops they're cooked like nobody before has been

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] killea@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I don't know how the US economy works, much less a self sustaining one...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Anyone else live through the dot-com bubble?

Or the real-estate bubble?

This is not exactly like either one of them, but it definitely has echoes of both. The shenanigans of things like Enron and banks selling repackaged loans -> this circle jerk of cash flow between all these gigantic tech companies. Most everyone commenting on it - but lots of people simping for and wishcasting in their stock purchases anyway....all feels strangely familiar.

I have a feeling this one is going to hurt as much as those two. The oligarchs responsible for all this shit may end up slightly less rich in some cases, and probably NONE of them will to fucking prison where they deserve, but all the rest of us are going to have to weather one fuck of a storm...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcPthlvzMY8

[–] Bananskal@nord.pub 2 points 1 week ago

Hoping it dies a swift death. 🤞🖕🤝👋

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com -2 points 1 week ago

This is not how accounting works, you want your companies to lose money on changes in warrant liability fair value, it’s a non-cash expense and the alternative (making money on it) is way WAY worse.

You also want your bank to lose money on credit valuation adjustments in their CDS portfolio!