If you can restrict the cars, you'll have plenty of room for everything else. A 12' car lane can permit dozens of cars per minute or hundreds of bikes or thousands of pedestrians. The worst part is, the more car-based infrastructure you build, the worse it gets as more people are forced to drive.
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
77 points (94.3% liked)
Showerthoughts
42600 readers
823 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The more space for cars the more spread out everything becomes and so the less walking is a reasonable option. Remember cars include parking someplace even if not on the street.
Even if you eliminate personal cars, car infrastructure is still a necessity in most cities - public transport depends on it, workers depend on it (or do you see tradies lugging their shit around on a bus?), deliveries depend on it (let it be your Amazon orders, shops' deliveries, construction materials and so on).
I agree that we have too many cars on our streets regardless where you live, but uprooting entire existing infrastructure that is relied upon by more than just your target group isn't going to help the situation.
Here's an example, tradies use all sorts of things, ranging from kei trucks to just loading everything on the back if a motorbike.
I literally have never seen someone use a f150 here as a work truck, they're too impractical and expensive.
workers depend on it (or do you see tradies lugging their shit around on a bus?)
I see workers hauling tools, 20' rebar, etc on bikes every morning. Occasionally I see a washer+dryer+refrigerator on the back of a 2 wheeler. But typically large loads like that are handled by 3 or 5 wheelers. Large concrete mixers and dumptrucks are uncommon enough its OK if they block an entire street for a night.
The important part isn't that the roads are narrow, its that the environment is hostile enough to cars that they aren't anybody's primary transport.
Blocking half a street might be okay, but the other half should remain free. Just so emergency services have access. And probably also thrash and other stuff...
They have access from the other direction, and presumably they know to avoid important times, idk, maybe theres a permitting process.
If you allow 2 full lanes on residential streets, people start buying cars and parking them in the street. Wider lanes can work if the city can prevent street parking and discourage home parking, the important thing is that you don't increase traffic. Japan requires proof of a parking spot to register a vehicle.
Street parking is pretty preventable probably, but currently my city rather makes money off of it. But Germany is still pretty far from ridding itself of urban car use...
In places hostile to cars, it's perfectly possible for delivery trucks and emergency vehicles to use streets intended for pedestrians. Trucks make deliveries at early hours before there are many people around, and emergency vehicles use sirens and drive at slower speeds. As far as general package delivery, people just use smaller scale methods.
Wow. It's so easy! I also hear if we all stop eating, food insecurity will disappear within 30 days.
Tell me you've only ever lived in car-centric hellscapes without telling me you've never left America.
Spot on, if everything around me was walkable and bikeable I’d still need to drive my car. I’d perish without inhaling exhaust and tire dust. Sunlight? Gross. People? Disgusting. Typical walkbrains
I am a civil engineer. Your city likely defines the minimum requirements in the public right-of-way. We call these roadway cross-sections.
If this is something you are interested in, a few search terms:
- complete streets
- traditional neighborhood development
- stroads (these are bad)
Also: having sidewalks at the very edge of the road is dangerous. They should be set back a few feet
it’s a typical problem of cities that they figure out that there’s not enough space to build trees, bike lanes, etc. after the houses are built. better reserve space first.
This is mostly true for cities that are old enough to predate city planning though.
Trees are not generally built as much as grown.