this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
370 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

86264 readers
5135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 135 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

There was no reason to make it look so out of place, unless they actually wanted to tank sales. Nothing about its look is necessitated by the EV drive train versus ICE.

That's not a marketing issue, that's whoever approved that design. Which, to be fair, may be the marketing boss depending on how their corporate structure is.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 46 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, true. But to be honest, as the marketing boss he has to defend that bullshit thing and I wouldn't stand for it as well.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why don’t they ever do retro designs and bring back popular classic looks? An electric F40 would probably sell like crazy.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s definitely not possible to create something that looks exactly like that with modern safety design standards but they are being very stupid by not at least trying to evoke that more in their cars.

Then again, as far as I understand it, rich people are completely detached from my idea of good taste. So we might like the classic designs and the companies might know their customers prefer novelty or “the next big thing” over that kind of continuity

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Seriously marketing has so much power in my company. They dictate what products get developed. Meanwhile my so company they are treated like jesters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I don't even think it looks that bad, it just doesn't look like a Ferrari

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I imagine that's the issue, that it does in fact not look like a Ferrari, when it is supposed to be a Ferrari.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Yeah definitely, like if Audemars Piguet released watches that didn't look like an Audemars Piguet they'd definitely get a similar reaction from similar clientele.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hushable@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I saw an image edit with a Toyota Prius badge and I legit liked it

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Hyundai's Ioniq Venus concept actually kind of looks like if Ferrari designed a Prius

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 39 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Front end looks very Lamborghini to me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly, too many Cybertruck vibes for my taste. Maybe it's better from other angles

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like this what a more finished design of the cybertruck could have been. Personally, I like the sharp angles and strong lines on this car (to clarify, the cybertruck is fugly and has no redeeming qualities) and hope we see more of this style in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I totally agree. It looks like a startup made a concept of a vehicle in a movie. It’s not ugly by any means ugly but when I see a Ferrari I KNOW it’s a Ferrari. Same way with a McLaren or a Lamborghini.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

It looks fine.

It just looks like a minimalist hatchback in a era where minimalist design is already overused.

The interior is the only part of this vehicle that is actually interesting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 95 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

I Just dont understand why everyone seemingly make EVs ugly on purpose...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The secretly don’t want to manufacture them so they make them look like shit?

Obviously they can be made to look normal, the Ford Lightning & Mach E, Lucid, Polestar, and even a Tesla all look pretty normal and arguably some look really nice. But ask a mainstream manufacturer to make an EV car and they look stupid half the time. The Prius finally doesn’t look like it’s trying to virtue signal with its ugliness, so designs can be improved too.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

But ask a mainstream manufacturer to make an EV car and they look stupid half the time.

IMO, it's probably more that they overdesign them. They want the EV to look futuristic and unique compared to their regular cars, but their cars already look like that to some degree, and so they overcook the design into looking like some science fiction vehicle. Take the Ferrari, for example, they tried to make it have a floating arch where the hood would normally be.

That's fine for a movie or video game, but in real life, coupled with the practical limits, it just doesn't look very good.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I just don't like that so many of them are fucking hatchbacks. I just want a sedan (that isn't a god damned Tesla).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There's two big reasons.

No front grill

So much of a brand's identity can be carried by the grill and headlights. And on an EV, there's no need for a grill. But just a slab of flat metal looks weird, so they add stuff to break it up.

Drag

The range of an EV is a lot more sensitive to drag than an ICE car.

So in order to reduce the drag, shapes are smoothed out.

Aero efficiency becomes a much bigger priority than looks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 68 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

The company's shares plunged by 8% the day after the Luce was unveiled.

Lol. They let an iPhone designer design a Ferrari, and it really shows. (Edit: The iPhone designer just designed the interior, I'm told.)

Whoever designed that smooth as a booger look clearly didn't have a poster with Ferrari on it, in their room, as a kid.

I would sell their stock too, if I had any.

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

I thought he just designed the interior?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

I drive an EV

This sort of shit doesn't help with idiots hating EVs on principle

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ExFed@programming.dev 29 points 2 weeks ago

The thing that gets me is when car designers make a car that's trying to be something it's not. It's an EV, not an ICE vehicle. If anything, amplify the motor hum under load (accelerating). Don't simulate engine sounds. We're tired of living in a simulation.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Ferrari has one of the greatest design teams in Pininfarina yet they choose a person famous for making a rounded rect to make a totally new product. This is what they get for their poor choices.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

To me it looks more like an iphone than a ferrari

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

That's because it was designed by Jony Ive.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not a bad look IMHO, but yeah Ferraris tend to be distinct and this isn't really

[–] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I think it's a good looking car but it's clearly not a Ferrari.

[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Looks like a Volkswagen

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How hard is it to put a battery on a testarossa.
Dumbasses tried to reinvent the ev

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

The electric part isn’t the problem, nor the marketing, it’s the… well yk

[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think marketing is to blame here...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Same energy

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't think it looks all that bad. Also of all the backlash people, how many were ever going to buy one?

Complete non story this one. It's been pushed by the anti-EV crowd

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It would be a good looking Renault Megane. It's a terrible looking Ferrari. It has nothing Ferrari about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Bro come on. Like the other person said, it doesn't look like a Ferrari. It looks like an econobox. I don't get why it's so hard for them to make it look like a super/hypercar. Nobody wants to spend half a mil (or whatever) on this soccer mom-looking-ass-car.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

The issue is that ferrari is only as valuable as it is perceived. If the brand is not thought of as being the best, then the product will not sell well (at the price).

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow, that looks like shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it looks alright, honestly.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I also think it looks alright, but if you saw one on the street, would you think it's a Ferrari?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, if it was a Kia then it'd be great (at 1/8th the price, maximum).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 8 points 2 weeks ago

Stock up 4% today on the firing news lol

[–] PapstJL4U@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

This could be a Lotus. Lotus E-clipse or so

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yeah, it looks like something Jony Ive designed... Shortly after the LaFerrari came out they said they'd never do an EV or SUV, which is probably where most of the backlash come from. How the turn tables, eh?

Edit: Did Jony Ive also design the interior? Because it looks like straight out of an Apple Store.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›