this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
413 points (98.4% liked)

Funny

15727 readers
1341 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WagnasT@piefed.world 99 points 1 month ago (11 children)

I was idly wiggling my mouse while wating for a download and the cursor got HUGE. I didn't know KDE even had such a feature.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 70 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I have the banana cursor and I amuse myself daily by making my banana big banana

It's just so damn amusing

Link for the magnificent banana cursor: https://store.kde.org/p/1931412/

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Nobody thinks of the banana for scale? How do we do now?

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone should make a penis cursor. That would be double amusing.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

I doubt it doesn't exist already

[–] mountaincalledmonkey@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love this feature in kde, if only just to amuse

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 7 points 1 month ago

My use case (other than amusement) is to point out something on the screen to my girlfriend who is on the other side of the room. Wiggle the mouse for a bit until it's big and then circle the thing needing focus lol

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

This has been a thing in MacOS for years, and it always felt so simple and... obvious? Well, it seems, finally someone else has implemented it

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah i disabled it cuz I always wiggle and it was distracting me too much lmao

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

It also got huge while hovering over Kwrite. Only once and that was a bug.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe 38 points 1 month ago (4 children)

KDE has this feature that if you keep wiggling the cursor fast enough it gets as big as the screen, which would be useful in this situation

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can double-click Ctrl on Windows 11

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Lost your cursor? That's okay, just use your mouse to double-click the Ctrl key on your keyboard and you'll find it!"

(Not what you meant of course but accidentally sounded too much like an AI slop answer, fitting for Windows 11)

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lmao. What verb do you use when pressing a key twice then? "Double-press" sounds weird, doesn't it?

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Double-caress, clearly??

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Double tap.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So that's why my cursor randomly gets huge...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Windows: install power tools then double tap ctrl.

Linux: search "locate pointer" a lot of desktop environments support this natively, or you can extend it power tools style. On GNOME ctrl should also highlight the cursor.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

On KDE you just shake it

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Nah. I'm just going to ⬆️🔄🔃↪️↖️↘️↩️➡️↘️🖱️↙️⤴️⬇️↩️⬆️⬇️⬅️↗️🔃🔄

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago

Hell, Windows has had the locate cursor option natively since like XP I think.

I've had to turn it off forever since I'm a bit spastic on the keyboard, haha

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Accidently pressed prtscn and roasted their RAM.

[–] subOrange@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can anyone tell what kind of work he's actually using those for? The image is a little too potato for me to make much out.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We have rooms like this where i work. Theyre for live monitoring jet engine tests so we can monitor 1000+ pieces of instrumention to make sure the engines running safe.

That said, that floor looks too nice to be in our kind of facility. But i imagine hes got to be monitoring something in live time. Each screen is probably dedicated to a sub-system so he knows if something turns yellow or red, he immediately knows what system it is, whats going on, and can call the test back to a "safe operation"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Many control rooms require you to keep an eye on a lot of things at the same time and have similar setups

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What kind of hardware do you need to run 15 screens?

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AMD GPUs used to be really good at this. Not sure how well it works nowadays, with generally higher resolutions and thus higher bandwidth requirements. I'd imagine it involves a lot of trial and error with displayport chaining.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Matrox cats are even better. 8 displays per card.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

TIL Matrox still exists. I think I used to have one of their cards in the 90s, but I don't remember which.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A modern computer can easily fit 4 low-end GPUs plus the onboard one. Most things that used the slots are onboard the motherboard or USB now.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not what it looks like in my PC, but I guess you might be right. Although it seems that most motherboards, people can actually afford come with far fewer full PCIe slots.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If you can afford 15 huge monitors, you can splurge on the motherboard with extra PCI-E slots.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Four GPU's with four outputs each would do it.

You'd only need a main board with for x16 physical slots as PCIe x4 would be sufficient bandwidth for desktops.

You're also not pushing the GPU's power envelope, so one beefy or two smaller PSU's would suffice. The AMD WX7000 series workstation cards don't even have the extra PCIe power connectors (last time I looked).

I suspect these are more likely to be two or more machines though.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

Matrox makes some crazy multi-monitor GPUs that could do this without needing as many cards.

Here's their 8-display version:

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

The main limitation here is number of monitor ports.

Applications that use this many screens aren't running a high level of graphics. Even a bunch of camera feeds aren't going to strain the GPU.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

Furiously pressing ctrl

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The cursor problem seems like it wouldn't be there with a tiling wm.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's because with tiling vm you don't need multiple monitors 😀

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My current role gave me an ultra wide and a second monitor mounted vertically

Almost immediately turned off the second monitor, and the ultrawide I maintain my terminal in a more standard widescreen area

I really hate distractions outside my field of view

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Just eliminate a few of them monitors, then it's much easier.

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Game. Map for the game. Background video/music/audio book. btop. Fastfetch x 8

load more comments
view more: next ›