this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
692 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

85947 readers
5731 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 24 minutes ago

It looks like a DVD rewinder.

[–] Bomnam@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 14 minutes ago

As time goes on I'm hoping more products like this that give what was once only possible via locked down proprietary software a new open and repairable life as theres many new products and tech that I see but could never use unless I'd want to just upload everything I do to whoevers servers and pray that they don't get breached.

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 86 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (4 children)

github
A user you’ve blocked has previously contributed to this repository.
look inside
claude
click insights
Top 3 committers is: some org account, another org account but with ".ai" in it, claude

EDIT: they are not only the top 3 committers, they are the only 3 committers

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 16 minutes ago

So? The repository is empty did you even check it. There is no code in it at all.

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't see that as a problem. A vacuum cleaner isn't critical infrastructure and shouldn't be connected to the internet, so no security concerns. Worst case scenario it ruins your carpet. Majority of the work here will be done on hardware side it seems.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

There's 0 code thus far. What "code" does exist is all just readme.md for various ros modules. Getting upset about the guy using ai seems a little premature.

[–] BendingHawk@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

Thank you for saving me the time I would have wasted getting excited about this

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 15 minutes ago

Well there is nothing to be excited about, the entire repo is empty with only a bunch of readme files. Zero code has been written ai or not.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's open source. Feel free to write your own software, or pay someone to do it for you.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 27 seconds ago

"Here is a beautiful piece of art. You say it's just a blank piece of paper? Please feel free to draw your own art on it, and then it will be as I said."

I know the real news here is the hardware, but it is still funny...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, everyone updoot this so the ones who come after can stop reading at the top comment.

[–] cristo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Downvoting you for writing updoot

downdooting you for dooting dootdoot

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I just want one where the storage the vac empties out into is on the side so it can slide under a couch.

These things take so much damn space and for some reason they didn't figure out there is a bunch of real estate underneath shit.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Delete this comment, sell idea to a company, profit! But in all seriousness this is a smart idea.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

While this is a cool idea, if you read the article, it's only an idea. Seems like nothing but a reference design has actually been made. Hoping to see it progress, but we shall see.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Concept of a vacuum.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

the robot vac i have had for 3 years is the dumbest machine. goes over the same areas multiple times a session. has a manual steer setting but if i gotta steer it, whats the point of robotics? finally gave up and got a dust mop.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

At the risk of sounding like an ad, roborock (xiaomi) makes fantastic vacuums. Great navigation, great cleaning performance, obstacle avoidance (cables, socks, etc) depends on the model.

They do offer a meter interface if you want to have it offline, but I'm quite happy with the (cloud based) app, allows a bit more control.

It integrates with home assistant but it sometimes goes "unavailable", the matter integration is a bit more stable for that.

I sure other manufacturers also have great ones, check "vacuum wars" on YouTube.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ooh, this might be a great project for my wife and I to build together

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I can't even get my wife to build a Lego set with me 🤣

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh the physical part is all me, she just wants to do the computer stuff lol. But yeah she's been interested in some projects where she can program and I can build.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The two things with robot vacs is one cleaning the roller is to annoying. I think it would be best for it to be like a shop vac. Yeah it would not do as good a job but would be a good general cleaner and you don't have to mess with the roller sweeper. Two is a base station to auto empty the refuse bin. Honestly for the first part it maybe just better as an option. so you have one for more thorugh clean that will need more maint but no more than a standard vacc and one that is less maint and can pickup more types of stuff. Might be good just to have the shop vac type go first so that the roller type gets gunked up less.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

The roller has been solved a few years ago. The split-roller design doesn't need any maintenance, no hair tangles in the two years I owned mine. Plenty of robots use it, as the patent expired.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I agree completely but the suction required for something without a brush is huge and you'll need a much bigger motor and battery. I had a vacuum that didn't auto empty for years and while my new one is a huge upgrade it was a time saver just to have one do the vacuuming and then empty it manually or every other time if there wasn't much dirt.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 1 hour ago

See I found it was not much of a time saving. I would rather just vaccum than clean and prep it. It was useful when my wife was sick as I literally needed to be able to do two things at once and cleaning it out could be done at any time and piece meal and such so it worked. But under normal circumstances, again, I would just prefer to vaccum which does not take all that much time and is not ardous. Now something that went pretty often and was like 99% autonomous where I just empty a bine once a week. That would be worth it. Even if I had to vaccum I could do it once a week and keep the carpet very clean or once a month and have it be pretty decently generally clean.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Awesome project. So cool DIYers can build something like this now (with a lot of help from the project owner)!

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 127 points 10 hours ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›