this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
80 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

86093 readers
4947 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago
[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't he just complain about the government taking down Claude 5?

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, and do you know why?

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Quick question, does "dangerous" include "known to ignore instructions, creatively circumvent guardrails and find security loopholes around restricted permissions"?

Actually, never mind, I can guess the answer and I won't like it.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't the government block anthropic latest model a couple of weeks ago?

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, maybe you should read up on why.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Please, no. The way things have been going the last several years AI somehow wiping humanity out actually seems like one of the best possible futures this timeline can reach.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 13 hours ago

And the CEO of anthropic should be on the board of deciding what AI constitutes a danger. We all know how this goes.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I agree.

Also. because of the way they work and how people use them as a source of information, all LLMs are dangerous.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Best take on this I read was:

“McDonald’s CEO demands ban of burgers cooked at home.”

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Dumbest comparsion ive heard in my life.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

You must be very young. Perhaps like many AI bubble boosters you were born yesterday.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 25 points 22 hours ago

Which, conveniently, Anthropic CEO defines as "AI from our competitors."

[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 day ago

Like the ones that could potentially take market share from his LLM

Dangerous? Like stealing mass amounts of intellectual property dangerous? Or polluting the environment to profit off said stealing?

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

Governments are dangerous

[–] statelesz@slrpnk.net 14 points 23 hours ago

Now this stupid marketing bullshit again.

[–] Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 22 hours ago

No doubt they will add that their competition especially the open source ai is dangerous. They have been lobbying against local open source ai for a while so it's not a surprise

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I swear these ai ceos are one trick ponies. again with this marketing of doom and gloom Anthrophic? really?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Better go door to door asking about illegal AI.